This will probably get some flames, but I am just curious.
Most of the providers that post here add their links to their posts. I visit those links to see who is providing and seem to notice that most of the "regular" posters are a bit more "mature" and a bit more "curvy" than the regular providers out there that dont post.
 
Is there a specific reason for this trend or is it just coincidence? Why do the younger attractive ladies not post as much? Less experienced?

Im sure alot of hobbyists are attracted to these ladies that post. Im sure they are very nice and have good personalities too, so dont be offended for one mans taste in women.

I dont seek out perfect 10's nor do I expect there are many (if any) that are out there. But what is a rating? To each their own. I prefer the average woman with the average body (not too thin, not too chunky, with average to above average looks) Hell, Im sure Im not every womans type! But Im just curious.


-- Modified on 1/1/2004 8:21:10 AM

Well..you would need to ask those, who are not "mature" and not "curvy", why they don't post lol

Happy New Year's!

Mel

I think it's because the younger attractive girls have all the attention they need and want.

-- Modified on 1/1/2004 9:03:22 AM

I am not sure, but I would guess the more significant word is "mature".  Not only in this environment, but at work and socially, I have found that there is a strong relationship between chronological age and the disire to exchange thoughts in writing.

Many of my work associates who are under 25 have a pained expression on their face when they have to actually write more than 2 sentances at a time.  they would rather talk on the phone for an hour to resolve something.  This is not a value judgement, just a generational thing.

why'd you steal my alias?

We all know how public education has been failing to teach the 3 R's in the past 10+ years. Maybe the literary silence of our younger providers is one of the results of this failure

How do you explain thousands and thousands of young ladies on other discussion boards and chat rooms?

Hey..I post all the time..and I am no where near "curvy" I would freak if I were not really thin and really toned..5ft11 inches and about 115..a size 2... everyone has different opinions about looks..I have had Client's "say  you are so F*Kin beautiful..and others think I am not at all..not everyone is Blonde and blue eyed..it would be boring if they were...I see alot of post's from thin providers..Ciny Spice..is pretty thin..so Is Jenni and so is Seirra..and me..and those are just the ones i can think of off the top of my head...oh and as far as intelligence..I recieved my Masters before relocating..and plenty of other providers are very intelligent

-- Modified on 1/1/2004 11:45:31 AM

You're right. I would say most of the lady posters on here are not bbw, or 'curvy' if they are using that as an alternate word for bbw.
You already mentioned Cindy Spice, and then of course Carrie of London, Chrissy Stone, NOSC, Jenni of SD, Ginger, myself. (I'm not thin, or fat, size 10-12) so I'm not sure where the author was coming from on this one..?? Mature, yes..

When I first tested the waters of this particular form of amusement (and before I discovered TER), I thought I'd prefer younger girls (21ish to 25ish). Except for my very first time out of the gate, every one was at least a minor disaster. I quickly discovered that I actually prefer women who are at least 28 to 30.

It was my experience that none of the younger girls had their act together. Many worked for agencies, which might have been part of the problem, but even the ones who were making a go of it on their own were, I don't know, vacant, distracted? My gut tells me that their lives, in general, were completely disorganised.

I think that it is really hard to know who you _really_ are at 21 or 25, much less have your life in order. I know I didn't really become comfortable with who I am until I was about 28 or 30.

The women that regularly contribute to this board all seem to have their lives in some semblance of order. They know who they are and, in most cases, seem happy with who they are. That comes with maturity and life experience.

I wouldn't be surprised if the guys who post intelligently and regularly are also more mature. It's one thing to hop on Instant Messenger and talk with your buddies or friends. It's another thing entirely to take the time to organize your thoughts and pose a question or response.

Looking at past surveys, I see that "how old are you" has been asked, but "do you contribute to the discussion boards" has not. (70 percent of us are 31-50.) The second question would be interesting. Options could be something like: regularly, occasionally, rarely, and never. It would be even more interesting if you could cross-reference it with age.

You'd think that such an educated woman would know that most sentences should end with a period (.) instead of an elipsis (...).  What, they didn't teach you that in graduate school?  LOL.

Seriously, you have to admit that the **average** age on the boards is considerably older than that of the average girl who just gets a review, right?  Not that older is a bad thing.  Older is still better than just plain old.  Happy New Year.

I think this is an interesting thesis.  I've seen my share of young girls in my time, and the degree to which they don't have their sh*t together never fails to amaze me.  Everything from actual needle marks, to sloppy apartments, to loudly barking chihuahas, to taking (and making) phone calls during a session.  I ask myself, "WTF?  I'm very young, and I have my sh*t together.  Why don't they."  And that's when it hit me.  The somewhat older girls who have their sh*t together are the survivers -- the ditzy ones never stay in the industry for very long, but the one's who are already mature at age 25 will last if they choose to.  That's why it seems like the older girls all have their lives in order -- if they didn't, they wouldn't have lasted in the business for so long.

Chat rooms are not the same thing at all.  They are much more "off the top of the head" and conversation like.  I know on many of the things I post here, I will write it, review it, and think about it before I post it.  Much more like a letter than a phone call.

As to other discussion boards, I don't know.

Another data point:  a while ago the question was asked about the TER member's ages.  It was a bell shaped curve centered near 35 y/o.  I don't know if that is equally true for both the men & Ladies, but if so, it certainly explains the age part.  If 2/3ds of the members are ~30+, then it is reasonable that the majority of the posters will be also.

somewhat echoing Slimroot's (and other's) thoughts

I feel it has much to do with knowing how to communicate. So when you first mention maturity, that has everything to do with having more life experiences to relate, and at the same time wanting to take the time to share that with others. Also, the more mature ladies have figured out, possibly by their duration of time in the business or just life in general, that it is not just the product offered but the service that counts most, especially for regular repeat clients. Knowing how to communicate and being aware, keeping up with industry trends, etc., is a skill only aquired by a seasoned veteran.
I have finally figured out, mostly due to members of this community beating it into me, that one's relationships both personal and professional are sometimes the most important things  in life. The sweetest, kindest, and most caring of ladies here have taught me how to build stronger relationships with my GF, mom, and other family and friends.
Hmm, ...Thanks for reminding me of that.
best regards, mr.man

I dont know how I ever forgot about you (maybe because I never met you in person) but you are right. You are an attractive woman, and if you are mature, it sure doesnt show!

I guess there are a few on here that are thinner and attractive. I guess I missed these ones because I was too lazy too look them up, Id rather just click on a link in the message.

About your website, its nice and Ill give you credit for not doing the "glamour shot" thing, but the pictures seem very dark and unclear. Although you may get constantly high ratings, I think the quality of the pictures would hinder me from seeking out a date. (like my opinion really matters right?)

and in some cases it might be most courteous to keep it to yourself, lest you risk offending others.

I have to wonder if your posts are legit or if you're simply attempting to provoke or inflame.

If you base your decision to see a lady solely on her photos, you must be attracted primarily by the packaging (which is o.k. if it works for you).  Others of us weigh a number of attributes, often because we've learned the disappointments of that approach.

As for Sedona:
There may be a reason why her photos are not as revealing as you might wish (think "discretion and privacy").  I've seen Sedona's pic (I find her beautiful), I've read her posts here (I find her a rare, considerate, forthcoming, giving, informative and tolerant participant), and I've communicated with her via e-mail (an interesting lady).  

Others here who've spent time with Sedona have commented favorably on their experience.

Her reviews are great.  I regret I live on the other side of the country, but hope I have the pleasure of meeting her some day. And that's probably true for other ladies who don't appeal to you but appeal to me.  Bottom line: It's a matter of personal choice and preferences.  

The link below is probably what you're looking for.
Happy whacking!

You're a troll!

But, to be honest with you, the pictures I have are WAY more than I wanted! And I don't photograph well AT ALL, so I'm not even bothered about it. I don't even want the website up!

I don't take pictures. Even for family. I'd be surprised if collectively, my kids had a dozen pictures of me.

Ive read your posts and can relate to some of them. I was stating an observation as my original post stated. As I said before, Im sure you are a very nice lady. I know everyone has their own opinions/preferences and that is ok by me.

As for this "person" calling me troll and all kinds of other names, I refuse to stoop to his or her level by name calling and posting links to their favorite websites.

You need a meteorite hit

Personally, I find that women who are older than 18-25 are more stimulating.  They are intelligent, interesting and more experienced.  I also can relate to them better (being mid 30s myself).  

Some of the best experiences I have ever had were with women 28 and over (with a couple of notable exceptions, XXOO to the wonderful ladies in MN).  One of the most wonderful times I ever had was with a lady who was 39.

I enjoy the dialogue on these discussion boards and look forward to the intelligence, thought process and topics discussed.  

I so enjoy the posts of some of my favorite contributors (including Sedona...XO).  What do these posts have in common?  Well written, intelligent, interesting and they speak to topics of import.

I'm 29, but I've been a lover of reading and writing my whole entire life. Perhaps it has more to do with levels of intelligence than it does age. No one can see clients 24/7, I don't care how  young or hot you are. All of us have different ways we choose to veg out.  


Best,
Tamara

That the people who post on these boards do so for ATTENTION, vs. intelligent conversation... debate... etc.

No one can phuck all day, no matter how young, no matter how hot. We all have different ways of spending our free time in between sessions.

Best,
Tamara