will give you all 3 examples:
https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/fiona-340037
https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/miley-9895750718-345616
https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/carla-dibello-340178

are these real in your opinion or are they manufactured?

reason I'm asking is that I saw one of these gals and her reviews were vastly overblown.
I had my reservations before deciding on her but in the end I fell for it

give me your opinions and I'll tell you which one I saw (and after this I'll add my review as well)

In my opinion 90% of ALL reviews are over stated and exaggerated.  
The key is quantity of reviews by reliable, straight up hobbiest.
And having the ability to read between the lines so to speak.

I mainly play in Vegas when I travel there 4 times a year and in my experience the young hotties are not up to the $$$ they are asking for. If I was guessing , I would say Miley but just a complete guess.

-- Modified on 1/18/2020 4:57:33 PM

We’re you a bit disappointed because you went out of your previous price range and found out there may not be much of difference?  There have been many threads here about that.

What were your reservations? What did you fall for?  No one put a gun to your head and made you go.  

For something more practical advice next time, click on the reviewer of someone you are considering.  If all their reviews are 10 and 10, remember that they can’t all be.  If you read some comments from a reviewer about a provider that you’ve both seen, and agree with those comments, remember his/her opinion in the future.  There might be some commonality that could help in the future.  

I haven’t seen any of the ladies that you mentioned or those that you reviewed.  You should add your own review as well.  If it doesn’t ‘glow’ like the others, NBD.  You might get a few PM’s from her, though.

Fake, inflated, shill, and/or self-reviews are unfortunately a pervasive feature of any site that uses reviews as part of its business model. Companies like Amazon and Yelp spend a LOT of money trying to police their sites yet many still make it through. Your best protection is experience and trying to keep in mind the items mentioned in the subject line. There are never any guarantees and, even when you do your best, shit sometimes happens and you just learn from it and move on.

you won't be disappointed.

Think of the reviews like the picture on the box of a TV dinner.  You'll open it and find that what's inside really doesn't look like the 5 star meal depicted on the cover, but you'll eat it and be fine.

If by some quirk the review and the gal's performance match, you'll be in heaven.

I never could figure that out. I guess I should check with "tini." I'm pretty sure he knows.

If you are only going to believe half the stuff in a review, which half do you believe??? lol

1. Look at reviewer a shail review may be done by a one or two time newbe.
2. Lack of detail  
3. Be concern with rip off. Dispute there can hurt a lady.  If has no rip off  it does red flag her.  
4. She brings them up ten times when you call her.

You dont have to do much thinking to see major problems. First, there is not one reviewer even with 10 reviews, then how many with only 3 to 4 and some with only 1. I have expressed my concerns with something needing to be done with these types of situations. How can a reviewer have a "once in lifetime" experience with only 1 review ....or even only a few?

 
Ladies make arrangements or discounts with the hobbyist, or get on other computers with different IPs...or something...that is my take. Sure hobbyists may see many ladies they don't review...but that does not count...only reviews count. To me, that entire profile has hardly any value for us hobbyists. Anyway, that is my view.

 
Any review is only as good as the reviewer, not the lady really. Look at his history, do you know him, does he write honest reviews and negative ones? You need to research the reviewer as much or more so than the lady.

 
Not even going to look at the other links.

 
And yes, I posted under an Alias.

-- Modified on 1/19/2020 12:36:47 AM

on the box of a TV dinner looks like a 5-star meal, you really need to get out more.  

 
In all seriousness, you make a great point.  When a guy says in a review that the girl came 6 times and he came 4 times, and now he's sorry he only booked 30 minutes, you have to cut the numbers in half, so she only came 3 times and he only came twice.  As you say, "You only believe HALF."   Lol

I only read half of each review because it's faster. I skip lines to get the message. Like this one:
http://needhamhistory.org/features/articles/a-curious-love-letter/
If you don't skip, it seems like a really bad review, but skip lines to get the hidden message:

MADAM,—
The great affection I have hitherto expressed for you
is false, and I now feel that my indifference towards you
increases every day, and the more I see of you, the more
you appear ridiculous in my eyes, and an object of contempt.
I feel inclined, and in all respects disposed & determined to
hate you.  Believe me, I never in the least intended to
offer you my hand.  Our conversation has, I assure you,
left a tedious & wretched insipidity, which by no means
has possessed me with the most exalted opinion of your character;
your inconstant temper would always make me miserable;
and if ever we are united, I should experience nothing but
the fearful hatred of my parents, added to the everlasting dis-
pleasure in living with you.  I have indeed a faithful heart
to bestow; however, I do not wish you to imagine that it is
at your service, for it is impossible I could give it to one more
inconstant and capricious than yourself, and one who is less
capable to do honour to my choice and to my family.

Yes, Madam, I beg and desire you will be persuaded that
I think sincerely, and you will do me the greatest pleasure
to avoid me.  I shall readily excuse your taking the trouble
to return an answer to this, for your letters are always full of
nonsense and impertinence, & have not the least shadow of
wit or good sense.  Adieu, and believe truly, that I am
so averse to you, that it is impossible I should ever be,
Madam, your affectionate lover until death, J. C——e.

The reality is that many reviews are written by mongers that to please their provider/s.  They are simply pandering.  Of course these women are active on TER--checking their review and reviewer and don't like a negative review--They have provider friends they will poison too.
 I have encountered a couple of times where I've written a negative review and subsequently gotten black balled by that provider (shut out).  And it is possible to write a negative review yet later still desire to see that provider again.
Basically I judge based on the totality of the reviews--if they are 98% positive / consistent--I'll go with it

And, expect a visit from the grammar police about the begs the question thing.  

If you've got a network of monger buddies you can reach via PM you'll get the real, generally unvarnished info you won't generally find in a review. Reviews are only a starting point.

All the above is true, it’s an art and a science.  There are a dozen ways to get towards an approximation of the truth, and all work in some part, then you just have to aggregate them into a final best guess.

I would add however the Agency modifier. Some agencies are apathetic OR respectable (the result is the same in the review world), and just let the reviews speak for themselves.  

SOME agencies make a concerted effort to lie, ESPECIALLY ones in Europe (they spend a great deal of time manufacturing reviews).  If you see an agency girl and see that there is a pattern, like ad goes up with lone review that is 8 by 8, odds are they are just priming the pump. You’ll see that there are just a few aliases that post reviews for the first review for the same girls in an agency, and then it’s on to counting the rest - so searching the reviewer history is important.  

But in Europe realize they go to the extreme, I saw a girl there once and she had nearly a hundred amazing 10 by 10 reviews, I did the usual checks, then had one of the worst experiences ever; so bad I felt robbed, so I looked harder.  I determined later that the agency was using over 50 fake accounts, and carefully reviewing their 100 plus escorts.  There were legit reviews (maybe 5-10% sprinkled in there), which made it seem more convincing.  In the end the pattern that gave them away, ALL the fake reviews stressed that it was a 2 hour date - when is the last time you read 100 reviews with over 95 of them saying it was a two hour date?  It’s a detail I skipped until I went back and went CSI on the whole body of reviews- but I’ve never seen a US agency go to that trouble, ever.  

Just keep the agency thing in mind, especially for the new girls.

One of the young love-sick puppies that just discovered GFE from a provider is not real and that she’s not really in love with him.  She’s probably a great experience and good service for guys with their head stewed in straight.  

 
Nevertheless, very entertaining. Good find.

OK - here is the follow-up to my original post.

To answer my own question - I think all three profiles are fishy but the one I had a misfortune to validate myself as BS was Miley.

After giving people some time to weigh in I did post my review to warn others. It is here: https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/miley-review-by-vohydo-2203609

It got posted, but after a few days I noticed that it got removed. After some back and forth with TER admins it turned out (big shocker) that she sent a bunch of BS accusations about me and demanded the review removed. We got it cleared and the review is back up and now I hear that she is demanding to be de-listed.
Pls take a look and take a note as her profile will probably be gone soon.

And when she does she will have a new name

This is EXACTLY what's wrong with your idea to let providers contest reviews and have the reviews held up until the dispute is resolved.

 
This provider made a nice little splash, got TOP dollar with blurred pics and only a couple of reviews from rather questionable reviewers, NOW it turns out she was gaming the system, had a nice profitable little tour due to TER and now that she's been busted as a fraud she demands to be delisted.

 
For the record "Thank you" for standing up, not just for yourself, but for the community who relies on HONEST reviews so as not to get ripped off. I can only wonder how many more guys got ripped off while you were going through the dispute process with TER?

"I'm out twitter world. My books are officially closed. Just signed a 5 yr contract with a client that wants me all to him self. I couldn't be any more happier! I will be deleting my twitter & everything else. If you want to keep in touch DM me 😘 thanks for all of your support 😘"

https://preferred411.com/P320409

https://www.theultimatesession.com/

is dependable, not LE, accurately portrayed in her photo, and what services she provides.  As mentioned, comprehensively by the replies you have received so far, reviewers may not see things as you do.

 
Beyond that, I look for context.  If a reviewer rates her significantly lower than the many other reviewers who have seen her, instant red flag.

LE, but is still a dependable provider on the side?

 
On a serious note, you should actually consider the majority, and not the outliers.  There are always guys who are dicks that piss off a provider, put her in a bad mood, and then they have a bad session.  There are guys who retaliate with a bad review if a provider won't cave in to a demand for off-menu services, as well as other reasons the guy may have an agenda.  ONE bad review should not be a red flag.  If its half good reviews and half bad, then THAT'S a red flag.  

 
When I see ONE bad review, I look for cred to the guys other reviews.  Its often telling when a guy seems to have an issue with a lot of the girls he sees.  Its rare for me to have a bad session, but some reviewers seem to have a lot of them.  In those cases, you have to deduce that its probably the fault of he guy and not the provider, especially when a provider has a lot of good reviews.