When one clicks on her link, a page appears saying her information is no longer available on TER. Isn't it a bit odd to have a chat by someone whose reviews we can't see?

--b.

has been the thing I have seen the most. Chatting is harmless and if you decide to go see her, then you must know that she is human and capable of having an "off night" as are any of us. In her case, you won't exactly be taking one for the team, albeit an expensive lesson in having your knob polished.

On the front page under the announcement of her chat, it says "If you are a provider and have strong reviews on TER, you, too, could be a featured chat room guest."

But someone whose information is "no longer available on TER" doesn't have strong reviews -- or any reviews. Not that it's a big issue. I just think it a bit strange that someone who was either delisted or asked to have her info pulled can be a "featured chat" guest.

--b.
 (who obviously has too much time on his hands)

I wouldn't read that much into it. Becoming "delisted" is not a death sentence, nor are there any hard and fast rules on TER as I can tell. For example, I often see multiple posts by hobbyists of the same lady in the same year. I tried that a couple of times and my reviews were denied, even though the details/activities were substantially different. The other side of the ledger says that she knows someone who could make than happen w/o the rules collapsing on her to do the chat. My advice, go to her chat, see if you can distinguish yourself so that you are memorable and then make the date. If you are just kicking tires, sit back and watch the chatters drool when she mentions her cum-stained panties.

I have not had Heather yet, but she is on my to-do list.  As I understand her menu, a hobbyist will not be "taking one for the team" with a gal like Heather.  Heather will take on the team!

She had temporarily taken her profile down for very personal reasons.  She had asked it back up in time for this char.  We were a little slow in relisting it.  All better now.

-- Staff

Thanks for the answer. It was mostly idle curiosity on my part.

--b.