Everyone here knows the pricing for a three way is typically double the price. If you read the reviews, we know that many of these experiences are well worth the extra cost, and might even be considered a bargain when factoring in the sensory overload and bang for the buck.

What are you smoking? Do you really think you're going to change the way pricing for this service has been done for years? The answer is simple: no, you're not.  
Ask for your version all you want but you're not going to get it. And how the hell do you think writing a review will change anything? It won't.  Not to mention that your review plan would have you paying full price for a really good session and then rating it a 2. Idiotic.
As for fairness, how is it fair to expect the first woman to share the cost of the second? Do you think you're the late, unlamented Jack Dunphy? Or do you really think she's doing less work? She isn't.
The key to having a good doubles session is to choose girls who already know each other and are into each other. Then they'll deliver a session that you'll feel was worth every penny.
In this game you have only one choice; agree to the price or don't book the session.
Nice old pervy drawing though.

Also, most ladies aren't as into other ladies as we would like to think.  Doubles are a little dicey for a lot of ladies.  Oftentimes there is one lady that feels that she does all the work.  Sometimes ladies tend up competing and trying to outdo each other.

if a provider has an especially good time with a client, he should demand a discount and even boycott her unless she gives a discount for all that enjoyment.  

in a P4P provider double doesn't have the same vibe for me as being in a three-way with two civvie women who are truly bisexual.  That's why my last double was in early 2015.  For me, its nowhere near a bargain if the girls are just tag-teaming me and taking turns pleasuring me, and that's what usually happens in a provider double.  There are probably exceptions, but I have not run across one yet.  My last double was with two girls I had already seen individually, and when they offered doubles together, I thought it would be the ultimate three way, but it wasn't.  It was just two providers taking turns with me, each doing half the work but each still getting full pay.  While I would never ask for a discount, I prefer to just avoid a scene that cannot deliver as good a fantasy as I usually get from a GFE provider working alone.    

...that you shouldn't be paid adequately for your job just because you enjoy it?  

Nicky was way off the mark, I but you added in some solid points on your own. Doubles can be dicey, and it certainly isn’t fair for one provider to do all the work, or even most of it.

Thank you. Your unbiased insight is always appreciated. It’s always helpful to hear from those who have actual experience with the topic at hand.

A lot of good points here, but what stands out is your observations re package deals. Another commenter claimed this was impossible, yet here we have anecdotal evidence that a pricing scheme somewhat similar to the one mentioned in the OP does exist. Maybe that monger lacks the imagination to manifest an arrangement like that for himself.

Point taken. And good day to you!

Consumers' matters, like it or not, is exactly our lane. This is a two-way business and without demand, you are not making money, let's be honest here.

Yeah I can't say I can follow the logic of because of someone enjoying the work they should be paid less...This doesn't make any sense to me.

It’s a caps lock “shared lane”? don’t think you want to go there with Alli, or any companion for that matter.

TBH the concept presented in the OP was based on an unserious, wildly hypothetical scenario where one companion desired a rendezvous with another companion as much as the hobbyist did.  Kind of a parody of the all too many topics posted here where mongers complain about market pricing.

Just not very well. You really should learn to go with a gif. They are much funnier.

and then I reread the OP and couldn't find it in me to even try to defend it. lol

You don't have to rely on some other dunce to know the difference between "your" and "you're."  Conan should have vetoed this one before it went up.  Lol

Chickenshit doesn't deserve good grammar anyway.

this will piss you off

first doesnt the original post belong on the humor board ?  LOL ...      

my grammar faux pas.  Why do you get special consideration?  Lol

a premium for doubles, especially the Kgirls you refer to because they are rarely bisexual, so they just just take care of you and spend little to no time on each other.  Its not a true Three-way, its a two on one.  What is there NOT to like about doing half the work and still getting full pay?  The majority of Kgirls won't do doubles at all, because they think its nasty.  The ones that still do it are the money-grubbers that will do anything for money, especially if they can add an upcharge.  If you think there is going to be much chemistry in a situation like that, then you are in for a major disappointment, unless you are one who is extra-gullible when you have an erection. You should stop calling it a menage, its not anything close to the true spirit of a menage, at least not the ones that I have had with Kgirls.  I have asked hundreds of Kgirls if they see women customers (looking out for my local hobby-bro Lopaw) and have yet to have one tell me yes.  (If I can get one to say yes, I know I could get Lopaw through the booker screening.)  If a provider advertises that she sees men AND women, then a doubles session has some possibilities of being everything you would expect from a true menage.  These will most often be indies, not Kgirls.  

My one and only 3-way was with two SB's.  I could really only focus on one at a time and felt like I had to ignore one.  Therefore it wasn't that satisfying and I really have no particular desire to do it again ... especially since it costs twice as much.  Naturally if two chicks want to give me a freebie, I could be talked into it.

He's cranky.

and that is hardly limited to the sex business, but like it or not consumers are allowed input where it comes to prices ESPECIALLY on a review board. You might not like it, but consumers have the right to whine about prices no matter whether it's the price of a meal, a car, or even a fucking yacht or jet.  

I would have asked for myself later anyway.  LOL

"I agree with you that someone should not be paid less if they enjoy the work, but at the same time, I would question whether its ethical for a provider to fake it in an unconvincing way, or worse yet, do a half-assed job, when they DON'T enjoy it, but just want the money anyway"

It’s interesting that with all the experience you seem to have with providers you’ve never run across a case where two of them aren’t just taking turns with you.  I guess you have to know where to look.

The most toxic thing about the fantasy culture is the myths around mind reading, and liking the same things. I'm supposed to go into a room, look at a dude and go "I know exactly what you want" and BOOM give it to him. OR, I'm supposed to just be doing my thing, the stuff I like, which somehow magically happens to be the stuff he likes too. It's all quite silly. And, it leads to a lack of communication, and thus a whole lot of missed (potentially) awesome opportunities.

You'll no doubt never get one to admit that they are curious about really being with another woman. It's a mixture of their culture and reluctance to ever go against the established norm. I've been with several Korean masseuses and escorts in their late 30's/early 40's who have told me that they would never have agreed to see women customers when they were younger. They were afraid to explore that side of themselves, and feared the reaction of others if they were to find out. Ahhhh....the joy and stupidity of youth, lol

I don't really see what is so "toxic" about fantasies.

do what is natural and feels right for them, and forget about reverting to some kind of role that guys are supposed to dig.

is, even if they are curious, they would not admit it to a man.  I sometimes get the feeling when I ask if they see women that if they say yes, they will never see me again.  (They might even see me more!!  -  LOL)  Its a tough sell coming from a man, but on the other hand, how do YOU get close enough to ask yourself in the first place?  That's the dilemma.  

I probably think not!!   There's no dollar amount that suffices
an activity which one knows nothing about!   Try it sometime
then cum discuss ....{pun intended}

I have only had kgirl doubles as they have pricing that I deem to be reasonable at 600 per hour. I wouldn’t want to spend 1000 per hour or more for a double unless it was guaranteed to be incredible!

You're absolutely right that words like toxic and fantasy culture have been kidnapped by the buzzword culture. And buzzwords usually end up wielded so incorrectly that it warps their meaning.  

Thank you, CDL. I haven't done any mongering of any kind since June, so I haven't had much to contribute. It's always nice to pop in from time to time to check in on the latest gossip, lol.

PS: Love your poster.

It doesn't stop them from running their mouths here all day, in your case we LIKE hearing from you))

My first 3-sum was sensory overload, so I get it.

You win the internet today!

“ Now if the original provider is going to get as much enjoyment from the third as we are, if not more, doesn’t it follow that the original provider should split the cost for adding the third? This is especially true if the added provider has an average looks/performance rating higher than our original girl. Imagine bringing in a 10/9 for an 8/8 girl and paying full price for both of them.”
Okay, firstly, the man who I find to be a sweetheart gets the same price as the man who blows my mind. It has nothing to do with the level of pleasure I experience within our session. The lady who sometimes books time with me pays the same rate as the men, and when I sometimes book time with a provider, I pay their full rate, no question about it. I’ll say it again, the pleasure experienced within a session has nothing to do with rates.
At one point I was #11 on the review boards. Did I raise my rate because of a placement online? Nope, I offer the same experience I always have, regardless of how you all perceive my skills. And honestly if I had a 6/10 my rate would remain the same.  
Yes, seeing two beautiful women in this industry is pricy, and rightfully so. Get over yourself dude and stop plotting against ladies who’s only goal is to provide you with pleasure.

I've always wondered the reasoning behind why someone would want to pay more because a provider likes the sexual experience with them less? To me, that seems a little odd that someone would pay more because a provider isn't having a good time. What does that look like?