I prefer she puts on the condom and the talent by mouth is the best.

I can lose my erection that quick by fumbling with putting the damn thing on.  

Do you have a preference?

Your thoughts if any?

I agree with the provider putting it on. The providers probably prefer that too to make sure it is put on right.

That's been my experience, anyway.

There's a movie quote regarding advice to ladies on handling sessions:  

"Stay in control.  

Know how far you're willing to go to get the dough.  

And always put the rubber on yourself!"

 
That's my mantra right there, baby.  LMAO!!!

 
xoxoxoxoxoxoxxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxooxo

I personally don't care who puts it on.  All I care about is that sex follows quickly after that, otherwise I will lose my erection, since condoms remove so much of the sensation for me.

I guess that is a mixed blessing though.  Because of the fact that they eliminate so much of the sensation, that means that to just keep an erection with one on, I have to pound a woman so hard and for so long that she will usually cum several times, while meanwhile I can't nut at all inside the stupid cover.  Naturally the ladies don't ever complain about that kind of performance which honestly is not even intended anyway, but for me, it is like what the hell, I hate these stupid condoms.  The person who invented them needs to be shot or something.

END OF MESSAGE

Most of the time, I will put the condom on.  Sometimes my hands/fingers are covered with lube which can make the task rather challenging.

and not to ruin the fantasy and the heat of encounter

I can barely get the thing on right, inside out, backwards, upside down you name it. Like HOC, I've masturbated with a condom on. This is embarrassing, and unsafe behavior one time I was with a gal(a complete idiot of a gal) who kept trying to use the same condom on me. I was under the influence and couldn't maintain an erection, the condom became stretched out, and kept falling off, but she kept trying to put it back on(I know this is unsafe) I was so turned off by her stupidity, I couldn't even tell her that she was participating in a unsafe behavior, and that the condom was ineffective at that point. She ended up asking for a loan, after that me and my flaccid penis went home.

To be chivalrous, I've often attempted to only to be rebuked by escorts who say that this is part of their job.

What say all ye

I like fumbling around a little bit...gets the guy a little impatient and reduces his hard on to a semi.
Allows me to have fun prepping you again 😜

Thank you! I buy my own, but still get resistance from some providers ... They cover more skin area so I'd think it would be a no brainer go providers, but...
 

This one is inconclusive:

I am surprised that provider will refuse it.  It will cause less wear to the vaginal wall, and more sensation to the penis skin.   It should be good for the providers because it gives more protection to the vagina, especially for those who meet multiple clients a day.  The only downside is the look.  

there is a good chance that she will be unable to use them without a lot of fumbling around time.

At least that is the experience I had one time

and, applying it by mouth was one of the first things I learned in this industry.  

It's so engrained in me that I actually did it my first time with a civvie boyfriend about 3 years ago. He hadn't realized I'd applied it at all, and after we finished, kept saying, 'How did you DO that?' I wasn't out to him. I became extremely paranoid that he KNEW

effectiveness compared to male condoms. I'm not skeptical, simply don't know. And in furtherance of MFisher's post below, I too have been with a provider who fumbled an FC and in retrospect did not install it perfectly, and that might be a factor affecting STD protection reliability as well.

Just look at the design of FC's and it's clear that there is less skin to skin contact than with male condoms. You can find studies on the net for about anything, but this ones just common sense. More coverage equals less skin to skin contact.

They are more expensive and kinda new. I've had providers opt for male condoms even when I provided the FCs. It's not a question of using their own because I provided the male condoms also. A wise provider asks, "which do you prefer?" When given a choice.  

i like to take it off, so i can suck on the tool right away and give it some tongue action since it is still very sensitive post-orgasm and gives additional pleasure  

END OF MESSAGE

Mish, when her legs/feet on my chest, I'll do it...it all depends on mood and position.

Then sign me up

END OF MESSAGE

Lingerie $150...perfume $85...red wine $60..lining your vagina as if it were a trash receptical? Priceless!  

Not opposed to using a female condom but they definitely have to rework the design...the thought of yelling out "swooosh" comes to mind when you enter me ultimatley making me reach for my beside drum of lube!  
....my nipples would soften at the sight of a bag hanging out of me 😖 nooooo thanks, gentlemen!  

END OF MESSAGE

but the one, most important thing that I agree with you 10,000% about is how they feel. The first time I ever used one I thought the lady was trying to trick me (for what purpose I had no idea) into having sex bareback it felt so real.

I will concede that I have had many normal condoms fail over the years, dozens of them probably, but I can't really see how an FC could fail if used (lube, lots of lube) properly. Unless a guy was long enough to "knock the bottom" out of one. I just don't see them failing in any normal situation.