I read a review this evening that stated "She said since I am a regular and I was her last appointment, no cover was necessary. What a treat! When I entered her, it was the nicest feeling in the world."  The provider reviewed was one a highly rated lady from one of the most reputable agencies, and the reviewer has about 2 dozen reviews.  The statement, of course, may or may not be true - but it bothers me either way for what I hope are obvious reasons.  What, if anything, would you do if you were in my shoes?

It happens more than you can imagine.  It is usually not a service open to the public and generally we do not publish reviews that state this.  

Why?  Because some nut case will go over there and demand the same service.  She may not be willing to give.  There may be a problem.

Has it happend before?  Unfortunately, yes.

Ending note, Play safe.  

-- Staff

Personally, I'm immune from radar, influenza and STD’s.  So BBF is OK for me.  For you other guys, loose the death wish, keep the cover.  That’s my two-cents.

As stated "For entertainment purposes only". I personally would keep it covered, but to each is own.

with most of the ladies he met.  I seriously doubt that that many ladies would allow him to do so.  Even PSs hesitate to do BBFS with proof of negative STD/HIV results.

Sometimes people exaggerate things.  Sometimes it actually happened and the reviewer wanted to boost about it.  Sometimes there are hidden agenda and unfriendly motives behind reviews like that.

There are certain amount of risk involved in this hobby.  Just be careful out there and only do things you are comfortable about.

Just my 2 cents.


-- Modified on 1/14/2004 11:01:21 AM

So the character described in his accounts are BBFS.  My character is covered for FS.

...that the person tested negative at the time the tests were taken.

My M.D. is very firm in his conviction that it takes 6 weeks from exposure for a test to be valid. So you must assume that the tested party has not been sexually active for 6 weeks prior to the test and has not been sexually active since the test was taken.  Frankly, that's a lot to "assume".

Also, in these days of scanners and Photoshop, it is not difficult to fake test results.

You can't control how other people handle themselves, you can only try to protect yourself.  I've been VERY tempted to forgo the cover with a lady I've been regularly seeing...but then I slap myself and remind myself of the risks (even though the lady requires recent tests from anyone she does hardcore videos with).  

The Bottom Line: find a condom that feels natural to you and use it.

It may feel good now, but wait till the next morning when the clap sets in. He may be screaming to the porcelin gods when he p's too.

There in lies the problem.  There is no such thing.

Though I do think that, as the years have gone by and I haven't been in "there" without a raincoat for a long time, I have lost my basis for comparison.  I guess it's kind of like milk.. I When I switched to non-fat I couldn't stand it.  Now, years later, regular milk seems so thick I can't stand it.

It's sort of surprising to be that guys who should know better neither standardize nor sanitize their reviews. It makes it hard for a provider to give a deserving regular customer perks (and this is probably the ultimate one) if he's going to brag about the BBFS deal. After all, it IS bragging, no?

The purpose of TER was to improve the quality of service and improve the business of top notch providers. If said top notch provider has to reduce service quality to the lowest common denominator, everyone suffers.

For the microbe-phobic, rest assured I am speaking generally here, not specifically.

Actually I am sorry that staff chooses not to publish those reviews.  If I see that sort of review it makes me want to avoid that lady and potentially any of the ladies that reviewer has seen.  The principal purpose of the reviews are to protect the hobbyist.

If the situtation was reversed and the ladies knew that a particular gentleman saw mostly streetwalkers or in general practiced BBFS with other providers, I am sure that many of the ladies would decline service to that gentleman.

I didn't realize STD's could be entertaining.

-- Modified on 1/15/2004 7:17:02 PM

If I ever read a review of a lady, from a guy who was seeking to see me, and he even hints at bbfs in his review of her, I will refuse to see him. I think it's a shame. Then people wonder why std's are being passed back and forth. DUH.

Reisgusting..i agree

what this type of people doesnt realize is that everone the providor they see is making a long line of people that can eventually all share a disease and it passes from client to provider to client to the next providor to 10 clients to 20 providers etc.

flying colors even though I went on a hobbying spree with dozens of ladies in recent months.

It would not be protection.  Good example.  A guy never saw a certain provider posted a BBFS review to attempt to hurt her bussiness.  The Provider got over 350 emails within 24 hours requesting the same.

-- Staff