I appreciate the look of a woman with ink, but at the same time I am looking for representative photos of the lady I am making arrangements with to meet.  Recently, I met a lady who had her legs covered with tattoos. In her photos she had no tattoos at all.   It is not that I do not like tattoos but these were bright and multi-colored.  No offense, but it is not a look I like.   I arrived excited to meet my new friend only to be immediately turned off.  I felt taken advantage of.  Thoughts?   I may have been wrong, but I acted like a gentleman and did not say anything.

But they often point that out on their web site.  And it's also usually mentioned in their reviews.  It sounds like you did not do your homework.

Though I understand her desire for discretion 😕

I understand if the tats are *blurred* due to not wishing to be easily identified.  

I do this because, as already mentioned, friends and family would instantly know that it's me if they were visible.  

It's just like when they lie about age. It's not a few years. It's 7-10 years. A "few" tattoos often mean their body is a road map. They know perfectly well that some guys don't like ink but will put up with a couple of small tattoos. It's just another way to fleece the tricks.

Nope, I'm calling bullshit here.  
Too many providers know that many tats are taking her out of the realm of higher paid.
I personally don't like ink, don't care who does.  
But I want the photos to be representative of who I'm making an appointment with  
And I'm sure not buying that they're airbrushed out of her safety, so her family doesn't recognize her yada yada yada...how many of her civie friends are going to rcgnize a rose on her backside?

Tats don't lie, if the women is also a dancer and you see here adds it stands out that you might know her. But the plus side to that is you and her have to a point did some prescreening and you know they are a real ad.

You are so right about us being visual. When I see tats covering an arm or leg or a large part of the torso, I'm turned off. I like a natural body. If the photo's show NO tats then that is definitely dishonest UNLESS the provider wrote a note that is highly visible about tats being removed from photo.

Any good provider who has a lot of ink will say so in their bio page, some guys don't like it at all.

I've never been surprised...even when they are airbrushed, their profile or website tells me they have them.  

It's done a lot. The ad should mention it and usually does for reputable girls.

Gotta agree...  Some of the tats I've seen that cover an entire arm, leg, or more are gross.  One lady in particular has such a repulsive tat that covers her entire back (she does have the courage to show it so that is something) that I would laugh in her face if she showed up at my door.   You should make mention of it somewhere so Johns will have an idea what to expect.

Don't you get tired of spewing venom?  It really must suck to be you.

I prefer to leave them, but I can take them. Tats are not a DEAL breaker for me.  

However, why should the customer have be the one to uncover the fact that the provider has tattoos? Even if it's just reading her bio page, I'm not particularly interested in "her" bio.  

To make more room for the bikini shots?

-- Modified on 3/14/2016 8:10:15 PM

Doesn't change my mind at all.

-- Modified on 3/14/2016 9:29:34 PM

I didn't ask you to (again) justify your opinion.  So, again, are you angry all the time?  Or just here? Anger is very corrosive.  I fear you must be unhealthy.

Mine are visible, and all my friends know what they are. It is quite clear on my TER profile, and I make it clear on my website that I have tattoos. If someone doesn't do their homework, that is not my fault. Mine are small and I make sure the guy knows that I can cover them, if it is a problem for him, on say a dinner date.  

then just ask the provider privately. Most ladies will have no problem with that. If it is that important to you, ask.  

her identity private, she can. As said previously, most reputable providers will mention touched-up photos to cover tats in their gallery section.

I am not angry all the time. Stop projecting your anger and other problems on me.

That's the way I see it!

Thank you for proving my point!
So you're "not angry all the time."  Just when you're here?

You are MINE!  LULZ

If you are a monger who hates tattoos, do your fucking homework and read the ad, read the web site, read the profile, hell - simply fucking ask her if she has tattoos.

A tattoo is a positive way to identify a person. Photographic evidence can cause legal problems for a provider in the grasp of LE.  

I will confess i am not a huge fan of tats, but it's not a deal breaker for me.

Did Peel ever put together a string of 5 words or more w/o using fuck at least once

I cover mine because I have a half sleeve on one arm, that is very recognizable in the social media world. My friends and family don't need to know this side of my life. And I don't want a weirdo hobbyist to look me up on social media and find out who I am and stalk me. These are the reasons we cover our tattoos. I do say I have tattoos and I cover them for privacy reasons. If hobbyist don't like them, maybe they should do their research and read what we post on our website lol. Then you won't have a reason to complain about that provider later.