but since you are the one saying it, I'd have to say that you are being quite generous at 30%, but excessive tattoos alone would not be enough to get put on that list. While I am not a big fan of too much ink, there are several heavily tattooed  women here that  I wouldn't dream of kicking out of bed, even if one of them was a bit "cunty" lol

but back to your original question, I would have to say that my number is about 50%, but that still leaves thousands and thousands of VERY doable women here on TER, There might be a fair share of Fuglies advertising on these boards, but there are thousands of hotties as well. i for one am still a kid in a candy store, even after more than a decade of being here.

Now lets hear from the WK's and BSU's who are going to accuse us bother of being misogynists, mean, and a thousand other things, for not being attracted to members of the OTHFBC, and even worse saying it out loud.

what percentage of the escorts that you see advertised on sites such as TER would you rate  an absolute NO WAY,  even if the pussy was free.  I'd say about 30% due to  excessive tattoos, too hairy, too chubby and just plain old and worn out looking.  used to think that I would never turn down  a BJ from a female, but now I know that I would !!!

... there is a hat for every head. Human nature is adaptable and tomorrow is another day.

and OTHFBC refers to the Over The Hill Fat Broad Club. You might recognize a few of their members right here on the GD board. lol

So why do need to put down the mongers instead of defending the ladies? Is it because there is a certain ring of truth to what the OP has to say?

Old, fat, married guys paying for sex is hardly a surprise, Old fat women getting paid for sex is a bit more of a surprise to many. Not to me, but I have been here for a LONG LONG time, very little surprises me any more, it doesn't make any of those things less true, just no longer surprising to me.

Yeah right, of course I was talking about you. lol

But now that you are queen for the month, are you still going to be cunty? I certainly hope so

Pass.  

I suspect the % of mongers using TER who are fat, fugly, smelly, crude, arrogant, inept, stupid,  and socially obnoxious with  
ED is equal to or greater than the providers on TER. BTW WTF does OTHFBC mean?

Gum job?

Who said anything about Crack Hos. What about these?

::start fat tattooed broad rant::

While the FTBs aren't necessarily my cup of tea, I wouldn't say I wouldn't.  I could just close my eyes, like at home, and think of someone else or concentrate on the feeling. Visuals aren't everything. I mean, do you make out with your eyes open?  If she's really into it, I'll get into it enough to finish but I'd probably want a very wide menu.

why would you pay for something you're not going to be into? Fuck that. Life is too short. Not to mention,no one is obligated to increase menu offerings just to get you to part with your money. I don't offer dudes who aren't into fat tattooed broads more for their money.  

"So don't hire a lady, any lady, you're not into and expect that she make up for you not being into her.  It sets everyone up for failure."

Awesome, on point response!

...about the lack of tact of this thread, posting it here for providers to see too (what's the point to that?).
Now if this question was asked on the Reviewers Only board that would be a little different, and perhaps I'd even weigh-in with an opinion, but here?  No way - just not cool.  It's like bad-mouthing someone or their family etc., when they are standing right in front of you

...he couldn't have said this on the RO board.  

I think you might be over-analyzing all this...
It's just locker room-type guy talk IMO.  And guys do sometimes formulate ridiculous hypotheticals (you've seen many of them here no doubt).
Hell, if I spent 5 seconds thinking about it (I haven't), I could come up with a percentage for this.
Perhaps you could too, if you were asked say, what % of guys who come to see you would you "do" for free in civvie life.
Hey, guys are dopes, we just all have varying degrees of dopiness in us.  The OP perhaps got a bigger share than most.  The best we can hope for is that we pick up a little civility somewhere along the way, and that our dopiness stays within the lovable or somewhat endearing range.

I think I found the OP's match.com photo:

I'm really just being obnoxious about this because it's a hilariously true representation of privileged entitlement from lots of different perspectives including what I assume to be a male perspective and a consumerist perspective.  

I'd never turn down free pussy. Nor would I ever outright disqualify for tatts, cushion for the pushin, old age etc.  

Here are the number of ladies within each appearance score range from TER reviews for the U.S. You can draw your own conclusions based on where you'd draw the line.  

After doing a bit of thinking about this myself, I am willing to come off my number of 50% and concede that the OP, insensitive ass that he might be, was probably spot on with his assessment of 30% of the women being completely "undoable" at any price, even free.

That number probably falls in line with my taste in women as well. If you think that 96% of the women on TER are hot enough to fuck, that's your business and your choice, but you certainly don't speak for me. You might think a woman with an average score of a six, or even a seven is "doable" but I guess my standards are just a little, ok a LOT higher than yours, but you are a BSU candidate, so that is to be expected from the likes of you.

That said, it still does leave me with "thousands and thousands" of women that I do want to fuck, and I am willing to give you very long odds that I have sampled a lot more of them than have you.

For the record, I am quite happy with the women I choose to see, and I would never dream of starting a thread like this one, but when asked, I am not going to lie and say that I am attracted to many of the women that advertise or post here, and that includes many of the women that I consider my friends here. There are a lot of women that I am friends with who know damn well they are not my "type" it doesn't stop us from being friends though.

...because you do have me pegged "smart, wise, intelligent, and sometimes genius" - damn you are good girl!
Hey, I just takes things with a light spirit.  I don't know the OP, but while dopey, in bad taste, and out of place, I don't ascribe much more meaning to it than that.  Now if he was actually going around leaving fake bad reviews for ladies (the parallel to your Yelp restaurant review hypothetical) then that would be beyond the pale.

I was just too lazy to do the research. Less than 4% aren't doable. And, I might add, according to your research, there are 168,652 reviewed ladies. So, the statement about "of the thousands and thousands of ladies that advertise on TER, I would do half of them" which is still thousands and thousands, doesn't hold water. Especially since a review is not a lady advertising on TER!

I'm a short guy.  So women make judgements about me without knowing me (often don't respond to my wonderful witty emails on Match.com).  Yet when I meet women in person my "success rate" so to speak is much much higher.  So if some guy throws a hypothetical out there, who cares, just like I've learned to not let others' shallow judgements get under my skin so much.  They just don't matter.  I don't take it personally, because it ISN'T personal - they don't know me.  Life is too short to let things like this affect us.  Just my opinion anyway...

but I still maintain that my percentage of women on TER that I would not do even as a free pickup in a bar has got to be right around 30%, but unlike the OP, I choose to dwell on the 70% that I will do and not the 30% that I won't. It doesn't make his statement any less true though, and as I predicted, he is being taken to the woodshed over it.

What I do find surprising is that you seem to be the only one trying to take me to task for my remarks. I expected a lot harsher reaction from the OTHFBC and the BSU's who patronize them, but so far at least, only you.

You left off white. Only white males have entitlement and privilege in our society. That was in the lecture.

I guess I could call it "February 2015" but then it doesn't jive with my seasonal album titles.

Besides, I was skinnier in 2012.

Aktchully, in eether end-o.

-- Modified on 2/15/2015 4:03:03 PM

there's probably a 1%. Probably.  But that 1% would have never met me in real life because we don't come from the same demographic. I was sought out for a specific purpose, and wouldn't have met that person in the civilian world because people seeking out p4p of the nature that I offer don't generally hang around in immediate or extended social networks (not to my knowledge, anyway).  

But, I'm of the opinion that while we all might have certain levels of shallowness, that shallowness need not present itself under the basis of "boys will be boys".  Admit to the shallowness as an adult, and face the consequences.  But, just because one admits to being shallow doesn't mean that all is okay.  

the truth sometimes. Did I ever tell you my cock is 10 inches.................................in circumference? lol

Tobi.... if you ever get tired of the Ohio snow, you could consider a trip to Hotlanta!  I can't be the only guy down here who thinks you're absolutely awesome!!  Other than you, I'd have absolutely no reason whatsoever to visit Cincy, but if you don't come here I'm going to have to find a reason to justify a trip to see you!  Just putting "2 days - Tobi Telford" on my Outlook calendar would probably not go unnoticed at my office

Perhaps the OP is one of the types of mongers I described. And who says a monger always has to agree with another monger, especially when that monger doesn't know SFS? lol

...if we approached you in a bar, grocery store, etc.?  See, you are tougher than the OP?  Ha ha.  
Just kidding of course - but that low of a % is interesting.
But I get what you say about the opportunity to meet different people, that has been a BIG part of the pleasure of this hobby for me - meeting so many smart, interesting, independent (and yeah beautiful) ladies and getting to know them just a bit.  Ladies I would never have met otherwise.  People and their stories do fascinate me...

half full or half empty?

...just civilly discussing, at least that is my take, and I hope you agree.
We may not come to the same conclusions, but hey, I don't expect that - and gave up on trying to convince everyone to agree with me years ago lol. (I'm generally thrilled just to acheive a peaceful co-existence!)
Sure, "boys will be boys" or a myriad of other similar ready-made excuses for different societal groups can be used to dismiss bad behavior.  Not justifying using that as a justification for egregious acts, just as a means of understanding human nature and intent, etc.  As I get older, I let a lot more roll off my back, and in the process I've come to reaiize that not everything had the malace behind it that I may have originally thought.

I could never have said it better, doll!    

Really, I'm just picky because if I'm going to fuck someone in civilian life, it's not going to be a one-night thing.  If it were just a one-off fuck, I'd say 20-30% of my clients, easily.  But I'm not a "hit it and quit it" gal.

I absolutely understand what you're talking about.  When I was younger, I used to let a lot more bother me than i do now.  With age comes grace, they say?  

It appears, either from their own comments or from posts they have made to the 60 and Over Board, that approximately 30% of the gents who congratulated Tobi Telford on her ascension to Miss TER in the thread further down, are hobbyists Ms. Telford would “rate an absolute NO WAY.” That's not due to bodily decoration, lack of grooming, failure to stay fit, a hard-lived life, or anything else they could do anything about. It's simply because they are over the arbitrary age of 55. There is no question that both the OP and Ms. Telford are entitled to make decisions about whom to see on any basis they choose, arbitrary or otherwise. Nor even any question that each of them is entitled to trumpet their biases to all the world. It is less clear to me why it is, exactly, that one must be excoriated for doing so while the other gets a free pass and is celebrated. Oh, wait. She's pretty.

It's because I'm not a dick about it.  

post ads on TER which would be a larger sample size.

This is hardly a scientific test and granted the sample size is quite small, but check out the photo board. Today there are I think 21 different ladies showing off their stuff today. If any one of those women would make your DNS list, you would be right at your 4% mark, even two would double that percentage.

Without naming names as that would be rude and hurtful, tell me how many women on todays photo board you would have no interest in, even for free? I can assure you there are a LOT more than one that would make my "would not fuck" list, a LOT more.

For the record, although there are several women that do nothing for me sexually on todays photo board, there are a few that are smoking hot IMO. I am not going to name ANY names, hot or fugly, because if I state publicly which women I find hot, it doesn't leave a lot of guesswork to figure out which women I don't find attractive at all, and my goal here is not to hurt anyone's feeling by calling them old, fat, or ugly, but simply to point out that the OP might not have been so far off after all.

I didn't notice what the album was called, I was too busy looking at those great legs which go up and make a fabulous ass of themselves

You could pair your trip to see Tobi with a Bourbon tour, Cinci is just north of Kentucky.

All that on a fucking twin bed, and he thinks he's sexy. I saw people like that in my rear view mirror a week ago Thursday, rolled down my window at the state line stuck my hand out and flipped the bird.

He just needs some plugs, an extreme fit class, shitload of waxing, a good disarming, a smidge of self respect, lobotomy...right as rain.

Butt, with moar resirtch that # wood gro.

I'd do them all. Might need a few drinks first with the one lady.  One lady's photo was terrible, I can't see how she though it was a good idea, but she did have excellent "scores", so without more research, I wouldn't say I wouldn't.  I've never been so fixated on one look or body shape, that it precludes me from seeing those that don't fit that profile.
 

It's kind of scientific. It's a good gauge. I would not 'do' 8 of them for free. The rest were all really hot. So, 40%? Sounds about right.

hat percentage of the johns that a hooker might see  on sites such as TER would rate an absolute NO WAY,  if they were not paying?  I'd say about 90% due to  excessive body hair, too fat, too dirty and just plain old and worn out looking.  I used to think that I would book most tricks , but now I know that I would not!!!  

another 9% are just clean cut, young, skinny assholes. And no, I agree, "em junior high school class of 2009", isn't getting paid to fuck.