One of the things i miss the most about review listings is a general list of services offered during session. P411 seems to have categories, but what if the gal has really no categories listed?  What is the  appropruate way of making sure we are both in the same page?  

If you're asking it's because she's new to you, which means neither are sure the other isn't LE. So that makes certain questions more dangerous. I would hold off on explicit questions until after some initial sexual activity happened, as then explicit questions wouldn't be any additional concern. That means, of course, some things you can't know until after the session starts. Hence the value of reviews.

A john looking for a hooker who provides services he wants has every right to know her dos and dont's before he pays 400 or 500 for her "time".  

For example, gals the guy saw previously might have all allowed DFK, so he just assumes it is OK, but she does not.   Wouldn't it have been in both parties' interest to have asked?

It wasn't a popular suggestion with everyone, but I used to suggest making CAUTIOUS references to her own reviews (when reviews were available). "I'm looking for the kind of experience Reviewers A, B and C describe (e.g., CIM without saying CIM). I think I'd be disappointed with what Reviewers X, Y and Z describe (e.g., no CIM)."  And she might reply, "A, B, and C are regular, trusted, good friends. X, Y and Z were first timers. Let's see how things go. No guarantees. YMMV."  
.
How about referring to OTHER reviews? "You kind of remind me of Provider M from Montreal and Provider L from London. You can still see their  Profiles at TER ID # and ## (and read their reviews if you have VIP). Do you provide the kind of experience that Providers M and L do?" You still might not get a clear or definitive answer. Or you could at least get a still helpful, "Oh my. I definitely do NOT provide that kind of companionship! I'm glad we cleared that up! Ciao!"    
.
Not ideal. Just a suggestion.

The risk you run when using your approach is that many women will feel you are trying to "entrap" them by admitting in writing that not only their reviews are true, but that in exchange for money you too could enjoy that very same activity with them.  

Things have changed a great deal over the last little while. Personally, I try to set up a meet and greet in a public place so she feels safe and I feel safe. I meet her, she meets me. An hour to get to know one another. I will ask about restrictions she might have then assumed everything is ok. The second date is a dinner date and keeps it open if she is ok with me she can ask to come back to my suite.  Envelops can be in the form of thank you cards or special occasion cards with a gift inside.  

Im not even looking for the more “controversial” aspects. Simple GFE is all inwant. which i suppose is subject to definition, but not really anything that comes close to PSE.  

...which I assume includes DFK & BBBJ, then one thing you could try when requesting an appointment through P411 is to request that the woman you're reaching out to review your profile to make sure you both are compatible. There is a place on your profile where  you indicate the importance of these things to you.  

I haven’t ever filled out that section. Wisdom of the crowd prevails.

Know your rights, you have the right to remain silent, which the ladies prefer, you have the right to ask, but they have the right to remain silent or outright deny you.

If rates were always the same, then I am wrong, but my guess (having seen rate inflation during the ratings years) is that it was way less expensive to meet back then. Taking a risk at 400/500 + May be ok for you (some others) but it’s just more than seems reasonable to me.

most hobbyists are sticking with the ladies they know by repeating rather than taking their chances on new girls.  I agree with Souls and GaG that you cannot ask what services are available from a lady you have not seen yet.  That's what LE does, and you never know if she has friends that she is going to email, saying watch out for new guy so and so, he was trying to entrap me.  Then you have really shot yourself in the foot.  

You know you can not ask anything. Even GFE will get you crickets faster than you can type it. It's gonna be a shit show from here on out. Clients are gonna get burned or left severely disappointed by shoddy providers able to cash in on the review blackout.  In turn, quality providers entertaining new audiences are going to have trouble filling the seats, because clients are going to become very wary of unknowns, and aren't going to risk taking a leap of faith.

SW, yellow pages, other rag papers, you could find it for less.

I predicted that things were going to get worse for everybody in those exact ways after the big changes in April. But it appears that it will be a gradual process, at least at first. Quality providers are still getting a decent amount of business from repeat customers and regulars, who in turn are still getting quality experiences with the providers they know. As time goes on and people cycle in and out of the hobby, we will probably see a return to what this hobby was like more than 20 years ago. Without reviews, providers will compete primarily on price and pictures. Without reviews, clients will choose providers based price and pictures. Top providers will need to lower prices and increase volume of business, leading to shorter appointments of lower quality and probably a lot more upselling. Screening will decline and providers may go back to needing a driver/security guy, which is more practical for an agency than an indy provider.

I wouldn't go patting myself on the back too hard for "predicting" what was going to happen post FOSTA/SESTA, It was about as hard to predict as predicting the sun will set in the west tonight.

Very well said---the combination of technology and demand for services will keep "our thing" going in some form---guaranteed!!