(Article edited to fit TER's space limits.)

Behave, the Video Vigilante is watching

February 23, 2008

OKLAHOMA CITY — It was a bright-blue winter morning in this Bible Belt capital, and Brian Bates was happy. The balmy weather conditions, he explained, were conducive to his peculiar line of work: public humiliation.

Steering wheel in one hand, camcorder in the other, Bates slowly drove a white Ford Explorer with tinted windows past a procession of sad-eyed prostitutes. But his camera was not trained on them; it was targeting their customers.

Bates, the self-styled Video Vigilante of Oklahoma City, sneaks up and surprises men consorting with prostitutes and then posts cleaned-up versions of the footage on the Internet -- to disgrace them.

"If you get caught by the cops, you pay a fine. If you get caught by me, you get a life sentence," Bates bragged as he trailed a middle-aged man who had invited a young prostitute into his red Ford pickup. "There's no reprieve, no probation. People will be hitting that video on Google searches as long as you live."

Bates, 38, is among a burgeoning breed of activists who are using inexpensive video technology to capture immoral and socially unacceptable public behavior. Often they focus on criminal acts committed under the nose of law enforcement. Sometimes they point the camera at the authorities themselves.

....

Because of Bates' sexual subject matter and penchant for shameless self-promotion, he may be the most notorious of the video activists. Tens of thousands of people watch his clips on the Internet every year, eager to be amused by the sight of a man being shamed -- and when they do, Bates profits.

What started out as the modern equivalent of a tarring and feathering in a town square has become a paycheck for Bates, a former marketing manager for a hospital. Bates still has a regular job cobbling together lists of people jailed the night before that he sells to ambulance-chasing attorneys every morning. But he's hoping to leave that behind for a full-time career as a public humiliation professional.

He licenses his footage to talk shows for $250 a clip, gets paid an undisclosed amount to appear as an exclusive guest on Maury Povich's tabloid TV show and recently agreed to upload his videos to YouTube for a cut of the ad revenue they generate. If he gets as many hits in 2008 as he got in 2007, Bates said, he'll earn $70,000 this year from his Web traffic alone.

"I'm a 10 o'clock news station's dream," he said. "Before me, there were many anti-prostitution activists in Oklahoma City. No one can remember their names. But everyone knows the Video Vigilante."

A pudgy-faced man who bears a slight resemblance to the actor Gary Busey, Bates began his camcorder crusade a decade ago because he felt powerless. Prostitutes along South Robinson Avenue, a dilapidated byway leading into downtown, made no secret of what they were doing. Men in trucks and luxury sedans picked them up and parked on the surrounding streets, in full view of children and families.

Bates lived nearby. One day, he discovered a prostitute and her client in a car in his driveway. His girlfriend was propositioned walking to the store. So were neighborhood children at the bus stop. It infuriated him.

He tried testifying against the men, but most cases fizzled. When a prosecutor told him, somewhat jokingly, that the only way to get a conviction was to catch the men on videotape, Bates thought it was a brilliant idea.

Since becoming the Video Vigilante, a name he adopted after it was used in a news report, Bates has captured hundreds of Oklahomans in compromising positions. They include three pastors, one of whom was recorded in a church van.

Police say Bates' recordings are considered legal because he videotapes acts on public streets, but some civil libertarians have called them unethical, claiming that Bates is serving as judge, jury and executioner. Though some men have hired lawyers, Bates claims they typically give up after he suggests that fighting him will only generate more publicity.

But his videos -- usually a blurred-out snippet of a man caught in the act with a prostitute -- often don't result in criminal charges because police consider them insufficient evidence.

"We don't condone this stuff," said Sgt. Paco Balderrama, an Oklahoma City police spokesman. He had reports showing that Bates had sought protection after threats from pimps and angry men he has videotaped.

"Obviously, having video images of a crime helps law enforcement officers," Balderrama said. "But has Mr. Bates' work resulted in a higher number of convictions? The answer is no."

None of that seems to bother Bates. His website, JohnTV, continuously shows footage of men, whether or not they've been convicted. Its home page features a photo of a startled man pulling up his pants, with the question "Would it be worth it?"

"Quite honestly, I know that 70% of the people who watch my videos probably heard about them from someone at the water cooler who said, 'Have you seen what that nut's doing down in Oklahoma City?' " Bates said. "But hopefully, I can show them that the guy who picks up prostitutes is not the creepy old man at the end of the street. It's often the nice dad who lives next door."

On Internet message boards and in newspaper letters to the editor, Oklahomans have remarked that the only thing sleazier than prostitution is Brian Bates profiting from it.

"I personally like Brian and think he's a positive influence. But a lot of people think he's a pervert or a nut," said Oklahoma County Dist. Atty. David Prater. "He may be a guy who enjoys the attention a little too much, but he plays a role in educating people."

Bates certainly entertains. One of his most popular videos, a recording of a Lowe's deliveryman with a heavy-set prostitute atop someone's washing machine, has been viewed more than 339,000 times on YouTube. After the man sees Bates and puts his uniform back on, he admits he is married. Bates belittles him for failing to wear a wedding band and asks, "What's going through your head, buddy?"

Bates concedes that he says provocative things to make his videos more outrageous. He also admits that he enjoys the thrill.

"There is a big adrenaline rush to doing this -- rushing up to a car and knowing you could get shot," Bates said. "It can be dangerous, but it's what I enjoy -- and it's either this or going back to 9 to 5."

Though he no longer lives there, he says he has a sincere interest in the neighborhood in which he films. Many residents appreciate his work.

"He's doing justice," said Kathy Terry, 40. "He's exposing what we have to live with."

Bates also said he cares about the well-being of the women. Pointing to one prostitute with a leathery face, he said: "She used to be real pretty when she first came down here. It's sad to see what she's become."

On South Robinson Avenue shortly before noon, Bates spotted a prostitute by an abandoned doughnut shop. Then he saw a man with a bandanna wrapped around his head step out of a Lincoln Town Car and move toward her with a knife. Bates started videotaping.

"He wants money," Bates said, as the man backed the woman into an alley and rifled her pockets. Bates called 911.

Within seconds, a motorcycle cop wheeled up, holding a pistol. Within minutes, eight officers searched the Town Car's passengers and arrested convicted drug dealer David "Half Pint" Robinson on suspicion of armed robbery. Robinson had allegedly taken the prostitute's cellphone and money as payment for a debt. Bates provided police with a DVD of his footage.

"Thank you," the victim, Loretta Woods, said to Bates as she went with police to give a formal statement.

I couldn't care less if I were videotaped. It figures that he's doing this in OKC, it's already a horrble place to hobby. ASPD which is big in Texas doesn't even have an Ok board anymore.

IMO Street walkers can and do cause a public nuisance, I don't neccessarily approve of his actions, but street action does attract pimps, crack slingers, and I know I wouldn't want to live in any area that had that kind of level of street activity.

Now living next to a classy incall location, that I could live with. I might never get anything done because of it, but I'd always have a smile on my face.

It was more about the street drug dealing but there was plenty of SWers involved as well. He didn't post the video though. His goal was simply to make sure the customers saw him video taping. Kind of risky I thought. I'm not sure he even had a tape loaded.

He had recently moved into this "wrong" part of town. He got tired of people dealing drugs on his sidewalk. It was his way of helping to clean it up. And it has worked to a large extent. Of course they just move somewhere else.

-- Modified on 2/23/2008 7:58:00 PM

I figured this dumbass got more than just an ego from this foolishness. His videos are on youtube which illustrate the ego trip he gets. These morons act as if they care about public safety,etc ,yet they are just cashing in.

The guy is obviously missing something in his life if he uses his spare time to do this, even if he is making 70k. I agree that street walkers are nothing I would consider in a million years but you can be sure that cleaning up the streets is not a priority for him, its all publicity for his sorry self and the newspaper who wrote this article took the bait.

One video of youtube shows him harrassing some Navy guy after he rented a room for his liason. That was hardly a liason in a park or other public place. The guy is asking for trouble and their should be no pity for him should it happen.

I just can't stand these creeps who act as if they are doing these kinda things for the public good and nothing else. If this guy wasn't profiting from this then it wouldn't bother me. The To Catch A Predator show is another example. They aren't concerned about kids, its all about ratings. The first two shows, they didn't even contact the police and the child molesters got away. They also advocate "treatment" of these freaks when in reality they should just be put to death on the first offense. That sure shows alot of love for the kids that they supposedly do the show for.

carries a stronger penalty than solicitation.

-- Modified on 2/23/2008 9:18:29 PM

it's much wider than that.

It's about things like hypocrisy, about who's going to do what about public problems, etc.   That this fellow gets the anti-sex pols and churches behind him in OKC is probably a local thing - in CA, he'd have feminist NGOs behind him.  Notice he caught clergy, and nobody has a right to hypocrisy, IMHO.

His beef seems to be more about people being able to walk down the street without being harassed, and how much effort the DA is going to put into keeping the streets straight enough that his family can walk to the store w/out being hit on.

It's about privacy - you can do things that don't hurt anybody in any mailbox or home - but then, when do they start hurting people?  People can plot wars and securities frauds in private, and it doesn't seem to bother us.  But what are we going to do when the law is broken in public?   And, what is real public harm?

The 4th amendment right to freedom from search cases focus on whether you have a reasonable expectation to privacy.   It's one thing if there's a satellite photo of you going at it in your fenced yard - and it's another if somebody filmed you car dating at high noon on Broadway.  

I trust most of us have that sort of judgment, but  as JackD pointed out, prisons are full of people who don't, and I don't think they should be excused because they pull their act in public.

What we really need is the Video Vigilante in Washington DC, but you know how that goes - you can't even take a cellphone into a Federal bldg anymore.  (I asked an agent the other day, why should a man released as innocent drive 200 miles to report to police - you know, give me a law, or reason or consequence.  The stormtrooper couldn't give me a reason except they wanted him too, and the realization had her ranting for 5 minutes.)

I don't know anybody can be faulted about profiting off a hobby - that's how internet forums started.

And I don't mind people who help cops do what they think needs to be done to keep the neighborhood clean.  If it wasn't for families, none of us would be here, so a little judgment is in order.  It's a matter of judgment here, and I think it's about keeping private issues private.  Don't do adult business in public, and you shouldn't have this particular problem.

even if you get off the criminal charges, there will be a civil complaint and nondischargable judgment against you that will be there as long as the courthouse is.   That's a hell of a memorial, isn't it?

And a street punk isn't collectible, but the uproar would have the cops out there sweeping up everybody for the next 6 months.

IOW, it's something only a punk who wanted to do time would do.

Smart folks know when to back off.  But then, smart folks probably don't solicit car dates on Broadway, either.

and why do you suppose that would be, eh?

All you have to do is read the newspaper and watch the evening news to know there is no shortage of people who would do a lot worse than just batter this guy.  Just because you or I wouldn’t attack the Video Vigilante, doesn’t mean someone else wouldn’t.  What makes you think there are no criminals or ex cons among hobbyists, or more specifically among TER members?

not to be too obvious about it.

Yeah, I'm sure somebody would.  

My point is that anybody that would is (a) headed to jail, and (b) going to bring down even more publicity and police action (even without the video, this fella is still news), and (c) a target for a civil lawsuit that will hang over his head AFTER he's out of jail.

So there are all sorts of gambles out there, but it seems to me like the guy who thinks breaking the camera is a solution or even a good gamble, isn't a very good bookie.

I would not be surprised to learn this videotaping fella has thought of that risk, and has some sort of contingency plan, perhaps a pistol.   In any event, he doesn't sound like the sort of guy who might be easily intimidated.