"The Internet is providing a new twist on the world's oldest profession and spawning a constitutional debate at the same time."

more...
http://info.mgnetwork.com/printthispage.cgi?url=http%3A//www.tampatrib.com/FloridaMetro/MGAMHPQAY6D.html


-- Modified on 10/6/2002 9:11:37 PM

This should prove an interesting week.

Gee, I used to live in this great country called the United States of America... the land of the free and the home of the brave. We had certain inalienable rights to free speech and such. My whole adult life I've watched as we traded bits of our freedom in order to feel safer. Whether or not we are safer is quite debatable, but I don't think we are free-er.

If the government is successful in shutting down bigdoggie, and arrest the management of its corporation, then all newspapers in the country who accepts escort or entertainment ad, as well as telephone directories will be subject to the same legal liability. There will indeed be prior restraint of free speech and could seriously reduce the revenue these media outlets need for continued operation. Thus all other news or debate would be greatly limited and only reflect a limited specific ideology. We are on our way to a totalitarian government.  Thanks Pres. Bush and AG John Ashcroft, true Americans, NOT!

-- Modified on 10/8/2002 7:28:38 AM

To simply lay blame at the door of Bush and Ashcroft is to blame last night's rain for the flood during the time of Noah's Ark.  If you want to be purposefully partisan, though, that is your right.  

Clinton had his share of free speech issues...and no, I am not saying he was the first president to do so.  I just find it childish to say we have gone from a laissez-faire government under Clinton (don't tell that to the Branch Davidians and Fast Draw Janet Reno) to Fuhrer Bush.

Remember?  http://www.aclu.org/news/n020896.html

-Hoot.

-- Modified on 10/7/2002 7:17:40 PM

-- Modified on 10/7/2002 7:20:44 PM

You are right, and it started with Eisenhower and the ideological sift of the Republican Party to the religious right’s control.  Those of us who lived through the 50's remember the repression of the Republican controlled Congress and White House, as well as the McCarthy inquisition by his un-American committee in Congress. Nixon and Mitchell were the next major attach on civil liberties, but the Viet Nam war distracted him and the country. After WWII there was a major shift to the right for both parties until Viet Nam and the 70’s rebellion. Jimmy Carter was a southern conservative Democrat and he did not resist the sift to the right. Then came the Reagan/Bush I administrations and AG, Ed Meese’s non-accredited and non-scientific committee report on pornography and the need to restrict individual liberty. Then Clinton sold out to the religious right to gain their vote as a conservative Democrat. However, for the most part, he and Janet Reno kept hands off to the greater extent, except when it was politically expedient to push for restricted liberty.  However, Bush II, the Republican Party and Ashcroft, as the enforcer, are manipulating the war on terrorism and our fear thereof to capture as much power as possible, thus hoping for absolute power, if they can take over the Senate. Sen. Hatch can then finish his task to stack the courts with religious zealots and insure the rewriting of the bill of rights. If you study Hatch's religious affiliation and the Mormon philosophy of absolute domain over all things, then you will understand how dangerous the potential scenario could be. The current administration is giving the signal to local LE and the use of federal agencies to go after escorts, strip clubs, porno and all things not to their liking. In reality, they spend more time and money helping local LE and prosecutors to control the behavior of its citizens, than actually working on combating terrorism. With the country and most local governments in serious debt, is it wise to spend money on sex enforcement and recreational drug use, rather than on education, roads, water and sewer systems, better air traffic control systems, parks and open space, those things that benefit all citizens and improve the quality of life? Of course, I may be wrong.

-- Modified on 10/7/2002 9:15:25 PM

It seems sometimes that we are on our way to becoming a theocracy... like those dreaded Islamic extremists

just get off our butts and work at telling other people what is at risk.