I also avoid Providers that only have a phone number listed as a way of contacting them .i.e. the eros ads. This coupled with no email and/or a website is why I have never gotten scammed.
Posted By: herbtcat
Re: I'd say 85% of all ads look too good to be true.
That's why before I request an appointment or submit screening info, she needs to pass my screening first:
1. Ad/provider is local (or local to me if on tour). If I can find concurrent ads for her in other cities, no bueno.
2. Phone number and/or email is not used by other providers, UNLESS I can verify these belong to an established agency (and I can find her ad on other sites used by that agency). If I can see the same pics used by other providers, no bueno.
3. No reviews = no bueno.
4. Deposit required = no bueno.
5. Available 24/7/365 = no bueno.
6. Pics look too old, or not original/personal. Ok, this is subjective, but if she's holding an iPhone 6, or she's dressed for a 1980's disco dance, or her apparent age does not match her stated age, or she is standing in front of a recognizable landmark that no longer exists, no bueno.
7. Pics used in other provider ads, or pics are "representative" but not really hers (exception: K-Girl ads) = no bueno.
8. Stated services are too specific (again, K-Gril ads are an exception), or not specific enough. Ok, subjective again. But the service has to match the context, or no bueno.
Life is good
The Cat