If there is enough online presence, such as vouches and/or legit reviews, I see no issues with little screening.
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't have double standards where you don't wanna give out info but also turn nose up at any girl who is newb friendly or doesn't screen well. Personally while I'm completely fine with intrusive screening, I won't ever do it. Meaning I get why it's done, but I won't risk my info. I mostly see kgirls so at least orgs serve as proxies and I know I won't be straight robbed.and I really don't want to revisit the specific discussion on sending pics of license/work ID, business cards, social media ID....
But there have also been some comments/threads about lack of screening or too light screening making mongers wonder if they are getting setup for something. One might imaging some for of distribution regarding amount of screening/info required that looks a little like a normal "bell curve" type distribution.
For the guys the two tails are clearly no screening/very light screening on one side and too much screening/information required on the other. For providers I suspect there is probably a similar type of distribution, and suspect that the tails might also be mostly similar as well.
So what I'm wondering about is just what is in the fat middle part for each sides here? If it turns out that for the most part the fat middle is pretty much the same for both clients and providers, what is driving the push towards that TMI tail on the right clients really don't like?
Because there are asshole guys out there who will do horrible shit to these women.. given the chance. So ladies want to know as much as possible about a guy before they agree to be confined in a room alone with them. And thats understandable...
On the other hand you have a lot of scammers, and disreputable women trying to extort guys, or ruin their lives with the info they request...or, you'll get the occasional provider who just flips to BSC, and outs a guys info on Twitter because he chapped her ass on a given day.
Bottom line....youve got bad apples in the bunch on both sides fucking it up for the rest of us.
I have given my info out, when I first started doing this, and luckily, it never came back to bite me in the ass personally.
Now, I have a P411, and try to stick to providers who are comfortable using that for verification needs. But there are still an amazing amount of ladies who won't accept this as a stand alone. At that point, I have to decide whether or not giving more is worth it.
I have inquired to a provider in which I felt the screening was too light also. That caused me enough apprehension to pass on booking with her. She advertised as full gfe, but in my experience, the only women who screen that lightly have been the old BP fleet of providers. So, in my mind I was either looking at a BP level of service, or possibly an LE sting. If I get a bad feeling...I cut bait.
You’re tail on the left (no screening) clues in mongers that she might not be a provider they would want to be with.
On other side of the tail, you’ve got a barrier to a provider that the monger wants to see.
People are always going to get more worked up over something they want, but can’t have versus something they can have, but don’t want.
If there is enough online presence, such as vouches and/or legit reviews, I see no issues with little screening.
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't have double standards where you don't wanna give out info but also turn nose up at any girl who is newb friendly or doesn't screen well.
Personally while I'm completely fine with intrusive screening, I won't ever do it. Meaning I get why it's done, but I won't risk my info. I mostly see kgirls so at least orgs serve as proxies and I know I won't be straight robbed.
I'd imagine, and it's strictly speculation on my part, the low standard deviation part usually means client is using some proxy like p411 and use provides that use p411 as well. This proxy offers protection, even if imperfect, to both parties.
Personally, as long as the girls are legit, I have nothing but respect for girls who risk more with little screening. They are the ones who are getting newbs into the game. God bless them.
Ladies if you are mad that guys won't comply with your "demands" for blackmail information it's your sister providers you need to blame for abusing the trust their clients have put with them.
Nikki Irish, yet ANOTHER "Well reviewed TER provider" just like the last BSC hooker from here that last outed me has gone and put another nail into the coffin of trust between client and provider by outing a guy who refused to pay her cancellation fee. This is a provider with well over FIVE HUNDRED reviews here over a decade and a half who violated the trust of a client over a cancellation fee. She actually tried to ruin this poor guys life over a few hundred bucks, Shame on this woman. I hope she never gets another date from this site again.
Like I have said multiple times I have no fear for myself personally, but any guy who could have his life ruined by being outed would be a fool to trust even a "Well reviewed TER Provider" I am sure the guys who trusted Nikki Irish thought their info was safe with her too.
Nikki gave out his cell number and his workplace information over a cancellation! Her twitter post was eventually deleted but the damage is done.
I agree that it’s providers like that who ruin it for the others.
Here’s a link to a thread about it.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
