I would like to set up a double date with a provider and her friend. Provider #1 price does not change for a two hour date. Lets say $1,000 for two hours but provider #2 price goes up from $600 for two hours alone but doubles is $1,000 for two hours.  
Is there something wrong with that or is it me?

to select the two gals yourself instead of selecting a gal who offers doubles with someone they are sympatico with already, whereby the cost is often no more than each gal alone, and often less.

But, if one of the ladies donation is lower than the other's, I always raise the lower priced lady to the same as the higher priced one.  I pay the same rate because I would never value either woman differently . Had that exact case a few weeks ago.  
 Once I've decided to play, I rarely consider the finances, if  playing is putting me at financial risk, i shouldn't be playing.

When you see that lower-priced lady, do you always raise her donation to the same rate as the higher priced one?

If they are asking for two envelopes I always raise the lower to the higher. But , the lower price  is usually my regular lady who is organizing.  
If they want one envelope (a bulk price) I pay that.  

💋

I'll try to be more clear.  

To  answer your question. When doing a 3some, I treat  the two ladies equally in that scenario , to be fair to them. It really has little relevance to what I  pay separately. Because I don't do a value cost analysis of the ladies I see. I pay the ladies that I like to see if I can afford their requested donation.  

with two providers who have not worked together before is often a recipe for disaster.  You should always let one of the two pick the doubles partner, unless you know for a fact they have done doubles in the past.  That way, you can request that she pick a partner who will do the session at he same rate as hers.  When one is higher than the other, there is bound to be some resentment on the part of the girl getting the lesser amount for what she will perceive as half the work.

Resentment that you've paid the donations that each provider set for herself for the duration and type of service rendered?  Or is it resentment that in addition to paying each provider the rates they set, you made it possible for each of them to enjoy playtime with a hot, sexy woman in addition to the paid playtime with you?  

Speculation.  You don't know if there was resentment or not. If they're pro's they're certainly not going to have their drama in front of you.   Unless the have two dicks and two tongues,  how can each provider be doing more than half of what they would do with you during a singles session of the same duration?  I will concede that them having two tongues can provide some additional fun, but you're not going to get four tits or two pussies in YOUR mouth at one time.  I will also agree that having one girl ride your dick and one ride your face is a great novelty the first couple of times, but eventually, "been there, done that" kicks in.  

-- Modified on 10/28/2017 10:32:02 PM

Not all doubles are alike, 👄👄

... when I see a provider explain to others in a public forum that she believes that in doubles, each provider should receive the donation she publishes--even when it's less than that of the other provider.  

You are the kind of gentleman we should all be lucky enough to spend time with!

There are as many variations as there are personalities. You are correct, there are no absolutes.

On the 600+ providers I have seen and many in doubles.  Many girls will not be open with guys who are strictly johns to them, but OTC after a few drinks they are very forthcoming about inside the business. When you're just a paying customer, you're always going to hear the sugar-coated Kumbaya between "sisters."

... unless he has reviews. Isn't that right, GaG?  

but every once in a while you get one right. This is one of those times. As others have pointed out before CDL tends to be a "hobby snob" at times.  

And his way is the only way to hobby?

find one higher than this if you tried.  I'm insulted that you think so "little" of me.  Lol

250+ reviews were on another site, including many doubles,  that went out of business in August 2015, about the time I started reviewing here.  Ask OTM, he knew me from the other site.  Same handle I have now.  It easy to say you have reviews when you're using an alias.  We see it all the time.  There was a guy in LA that talked big, and then one day he accidentally posted with his real handle after starting the thread with his alias.  He had three reviews, one a year for three years, after talking smack for a couple of years about being a high-volume hobbyist, so we just don't know, do we?