Let it roll off. I think you chose the word boy due to the age diffrence between the two of you, that and the fact that you're a mother would put things in a differnt light for you versus a guy wanting to play hide the sausage with 18 year old gals. Nothing wrong with either view point, I've started referring to 18 year old girls as youngun's I'm like where's you're mom?. I personally don't typically see ladies under around 25 or so 21 probally be my low limit plus theres the possibility of getting buzzed together and I'm only 35 myself. When my daughter gets older I'll probally head torward ladies more my age just a me thing am I weird? Well probally depends on who ya ask. Great  thing about life and the hobby some thing for everyone. Some guys like spinners and some like midgets in clown costumes spanking their ass while wearing a diaper. As long as everyone is of age and gives consent to do it not do whatever or whoever they choose it's all good. Stay true to yourself Melissa when this is all over that and family is all ya got.

...when you have children yourself. While the young hotties are certainly tempting, I would be seriously creeped out if I had sex with a lady younger than my daughter (besides, there are plenty of mature hotties on this board). I realize that's my problem, not others', but I suspect that, for some ladies with children at home or in school, the prospect of a younger client could be equally uncomfortable.

Anyone here blaring the morals trumpet is surely going to hit a sour note.  

Why don't you start a dick size thread? And you can be the biggest dickhead!!

He lived the fantasy that many (most?) young guys have in having an older woman teach him how it's really done. All of your "Boy's" subsequent lovers would be thanking you.

I don't anticipate an at-a-BOY! for living up to my own morals.

I think Miss Melissa's words where taken out of context, while you do make some valid points that I won't argue on the merits of you're post, I think the fact that she had a son older than the prospective "client" is what got to her. Don't think she was trying to make anyone feel bad about what they do. Good point captain obvious pointing out that adultery and prostitution are frowned upon by society.  

You beat all the other softer guys here with your reply to my post. No easy feat, I'll grant you that. Props dog.

-- Modified on 8/27/2014 12:30:45 PM

If she did what you said, I would agree with you. But she started with "Having morals sucks." Remember, Mr. Ginko Biloba?

I think the only reason we even had the discussion is she attributed her decision to 'Morals' when it was really a 'Preference'. I myself, have a lot of preferences; younger, thinner, etc. but those do not make me feel I am making a moral decision. As long as the lad was 18 or older, it was really a decision based on preference, not on morals.

Calling him a john is an insult to johns.

but not seeing a john for "morality" issues is the height of hypocrisy. If men or women don't want to see johns/hookers because of a too large age difference because of some kind of "creep factor" on their part, that is their right, but to call it "having morals" is laughable, and for BSU candidates trying to defend said behavior is even more laughable.

It seems like every time I make a post, I look a little further down the thread to see that you have just said the same thing. lol

The list of candidates is too long for the limited space I have here, but I am sure you can thing of a couple of dozen right off the top of your head.

and who is to say that it is morally wrong for two "adults" to engage in consensual sex with each other despite any age difference.

If the OP hadn't noticed, that's the excuse society in general uses to long down their collective noses at all hookers/johns. I really can't imagine how the OP could possibly come off any more narrow minded, judgmental, and yes Hypocritical if she had tried.

I tried to give her the BOD by blaming it on simply a "bad choice of words" but the OP has doubled down on stupid and still claims it's a "moral" issue. Morals are what keep a man from fucking a twelve year old trafficking victim. Morals are what keeps someone from bare backing a drunk hooker that is begging for it because she is past the point of "consent", There are many "moral" issues we face in this hobby of ours, but not fucking another adult because of a perceived age difference has NOTHING to do with morals and the OP really needs to get off of her high fucking horse.

So maybe I'm just too nice, I viewed it as a broad term not to be taken literally. I think it was a creep factor thing for her but she chose to use the word morals for lack of a better term. I agree with ya no way anybody here can call anyone on most anything. The gals see us for money and most of us fellas are cheating, lying, adultry committing etc etc...  
I get the point but I think she took a lot of badgering over word choice.  
You're still a prick though

The SPOTY's this year seem to be dominated by only a couple of posters here, but the BSU's seem to be wide open, although I would give the early edge to BonorDonor, with the Turdmeister right on his heels.

Ciscodog falls right in there. I mean when was the last time we saw him here. The man travelled all the way from Carolina Board to GD board just to stand up for gal. Attaboy !!! Although his perennially pissy attitude reminds me of Fungy.  Maybe fungy had a twin he doesn't know of...

"Attention...Your attention please...we have another hooker meltdown in aisle three!"

Just a thought honey but you might want to take the word "sweet" out of your handle. lol.

and we gave the OP plenty of chances to clarify her statement and to come off of her ridiculous "morality" statement, but to no avail. If she wants to double down on stupid, she has to expect to get called on it.

So yes, you are being "too nice" but in your defense at least you aren't a BSU candidate, you've got a LONG LONG ways to go before even breaking into the top 100 BSU's

You haven't called me a prick in a month or more. I was beginning to wonder if you weren't noticing me anymore or...dare I say it...I had "softened" recently. lol

Meltdowns are not just for hookers...lol

to show scorn for a poster here? lol

-- Modified on 8/27/2014 12:46:21 PM

Nope, no meltdowns for me my dear. JD always cool as a cucumber. Bigger, too. lol

I didnt view it as anything other than a bad description of what happened, on the other hand if a someone who partakes on either side of this hobby had the nerve to lecture us about morals you and I would probally be racing to see who could post an obnoxious reply first

BigNarc, as we speak, is secretly searching thousands of your posts for that time you called him an asshole, and while using the derogatory definition of the word too! roflmao!

Even JohnyPimpsSympathetically agrees, and he should know.  It takes a lot to impress him, as you can see

to describe yourself. LOL!  Also "drunk" and "whoremonger."

The girth looks about right but the length is off by a little.

You have the RIGHT attitude!

I don't do cupcakes. And you did have a meltdown. Bigger is not always better, just ask the guy who can't put it all the way in or has the ladies refuse him. So you and your cucumber, have a great day.

Thank baby Jesus we will never meet.

a person's standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do.

She didn't even see the thread. Just because the boys club decided it was time to play their creepy little "destroy the hooker" game and managed to get a bunch of posts in doesn't mean you "gave" her any chances.

It is not morals when you turn down someone of LEGAL age, it is preference.

Though I doubt GaG and his back door buddies will make it through the first paragraph. Moving your lips for that long must be exhausting! Ask Floyd Mayweather to read it for you guys.

Typical myopic moro

Um is this BSU an East Coast thing? or is it a TER thing? I suppose it is the equivalent of "lapdog" in the defunct Walmart board out here in the West Coast?  LOL.

Slick.

It has to do with two views of subjectivity.

But I don't let that shit get under my skin...

Have you ever considered a career in politics?

I still dont understand why people cant see that if the young man was of age, it is no longer an issue of morality but rather of preference. If the young man was 18 then two consulting adults having sex is not immoral. If the age of the two consulting adults is significantly far apart where one of them feels creepy or uncomfortable then it is a matter of preference and has nothing to do with moral issues.  

You can't stop, or fix, stupid. You can only hope to contain it.

The puzzle centers on the question, can an action be said to be moral even if the person acting is not acting on principle. And the discussion on this thread suggests that, yes, such a claim is valid.

Yesterday I had a session with a provider I've gotten to know fairly well and who I very much enjoy. It was a mutually beneficial, and it caused no one ant harm. Therefore it was a good thing to do, so we did it. In fact, since it was a good thing to do, we can say it would have been immoral NOT to have done the session.

They are normally referred to here as "manginas' or sometimes "white knights" I thought maybe it was time for a new term, and "he-cunt" didn't seem like it would be allowed here for long. So, in response to one of the worst suck up posts I had seen in quite a while, the BSU's were born.

If the term catches on great, SPOTY (Stupidest Poster Of The Year) seem to have taken hold. We will see if BSU has the same support. There certainly is no shortage of candidates, that is for sure.

Once again, while your babbling might be done using complete sentences, your conclusions are as faulty as ever.

YOU might relate to the OP's claim that fucking a grown man who is much younger that her is an "immoral act" but it's clear that you, and her are in the minority here.

I do love the way you simply "claim victory" even when the facts are clear you have the minority opinion here. Just because she calls him a "boy" doesn't change the fact that he is/was a full grown man. Creep factor aside, this is an example of "preference disguised as morality" not an actual matter of morals.

I call Curly APU all the time because he is my friend. YOU, are certainly not his friend, which makes your remarks, cheap, petty and racist. I hope you only take shots like that from behind the safety of your keyboard. Said in person, dental work might be in order.

What a pussy you are. and a racist pussy to boot.

I can call him APU, but if you ever do so in my presence without a smile on your face, you better be prepared to duck.

The hooker got called out for making absurd comments as she was placing herself above others with a ridic statement about her having "morals" while participating in an illegal activity that she participates in and knowing full well it would cause great pain to "the other woman."

Is that despite their own whoremongering TER is full of pious, self righteous, narrow minded old men, who think only they have the right to fuck hookers, and that it can only be done "their way" and furthermore that your fantasies are "sick" while theirs are "normal"

Welcome to GD. lol

You might say that to have NOT had the session would have been immoral, but I doubt anyone else would agree, and since your entire post was based on me accepting that premise, everything else you said was simply a waste of bandwidth.

Did you go to the school of debating where the more words you used, the stronger you were told your position was? If so, I would demand my money back if I were you. Some things are quite simple and can be summed up in just a few words, obvious bullshit doesn't need a lengthy rebuttal, it just needs to be called out for the bullshit that it is.

Each individual defines their own morals. She not once condemned those that don't share her morals. I have a moral code I follow to the letter. I believe I am a moral man. Yes, I am a John. I am married. But I hobby with permission, so it is within my moral code. Now I know anther man I consider basically moral even though he does not follow my code as he is sneaking out to hobby. His wife gave up sex because it became painful. He needs sex in his life to be happy, so he sees escorts. He hides it as to not hurt his wife he loves. I couldn't do what he does because of my code of morals but he has his own he follows and that is fine.  

In all fairness, I just looked at Melissa's website and she does state she prefers men 45 years old and older. If I was an eighteen year old and saw that, I wouldn't even have contacted her.

No, I don't relate to that the OP's claim that her fucking a grown man is immoral. I couldn't care less about that. You and a few others seem to have some Puritanical outlook on deciding whether her actions were moral, immoral, amoral, or preference based. The puzzle this creates is the question if a person claims an act (or the restraint of an act) as moral, who can say otherwise? The argument that there is no moral principle involved seems to give you license to make these decisions for her. That sets up the puzzle. My solution to the puzzle is that moral principals are unnecessary. If a person feels that they acted in a moral way, their claim to have done so is valid even though YOU can't point to a moral principle to justify the claim. The moral decision can as easily be based on the ACT as a decision as to the elected PRINCIPLE, since one is as arbitrary as the other.