Soooo dangerous. FUck that ShIt.

-- Modified on 12/3/2013 1:17:21 AM

Or did no one take sex ed or researched stds

Who the fuck is going to take you or your question seriously ?

...slide is less risky than DATY.  I would ask for a second opinion.  Read the entire thread...

I find this so comical these women actually think they are safter. Last I checked the FLUIDS were on the tip of the weenie, and all over the outside and inside of a vagina...you do not have to insert it for them to mix. I don't care if another provider wants to bareback the entire NFL, but don't delude yourself into thinking "Privates to Privates" massage is any safer...it is only safer in regards to pregnancy, not std transmission. If you're going to go that far, you may as well have bbfs. That's about as stupid as doing bbbj and not cim because you don't want to catch herpes lol. Um, you've already got it on CONTACT, not from the cum bwahahhaa.  

Another thing...not many women even know that P to P is suggesting to guys that they offer bbfs, and so many have that on their profiles, yet scream about guys trying to stick it in unprotected lol. If it meant a damn condom was on, it would be called SEX, and there is already an option for that.  

-- Modified on 12/3/2013 10:07:35 AM

OMG.... GROSS!!!

In this day & time of all the STDs... What stupid idiot provider offers BAREBACK!!! I love my life & no amount of money is worth getting an STD for...  And hobbyists, do u really want to take an std home to ur significant other... Really... GROSS!!!