Let me explain:

I know that the whole package is important, but if you could choose between a client who is a gentleman, well dressed and well spoken, who is easy to deal with and agreeable in personality, yet is a dud in the sack; but then compare to someone who's a bit cruder, a bit slovenly, not agreeable and a bit difficult to deal with; but they knock your socks off in bed;

Who would you choose, and why?

Just wondering.

Almond (all men) are Joy.  Just kidding! I prefer someone who is nice, clean and easy to deal with, not so much easy on the eyes. However, I'm not saying that both wouldn't be nice. It helps if a man pleases us, but it's not always necessary. I also enjoy the conversations, spending a lot of time pleasuring him and the rest comes naturally.

Hugs,
ciara

I would have few good men with good taste from 10 am to 8 pm.

Then I would definitely have one man that taste good to end my night.

Simple choices, not a brainer for me.

Actually, it is what I do every day -- work, work work, please, please, please -- then is MY time to be pleased and nada about work!

BDG

-- Modified on 6/20/2007 3:35:22 PM

Ciara~

You summed it up very nicely.

...if it's a short tryst (maybe an hour), then give me the one that tastes good, since all that other stuff won't matter.

If the date is longer and there will be down time, then someone that I am able converse with is nice.

A man with good taste ( pineapple juice?) can be taught to be good in bed.

A man who is slovenly can be taught to shower and shave, but not to raise his IQ.

...if i had to choose between the two, it'd be the first guy...the boring, well-groomed gent. only because i can't tolerate "slovenly." rude, yes. selfish, no problem. difficult, sure thing. but slovenly? no way.

But you can buy pineapple juice by the case

You couldn't have said a better answer than that. I totally agree with Jasinda!!