I truly hope that MDkiller has been unmoderated, he is just what we needed on a Sunday afternoon.

So is this a question about weight vs height or d*ck size?  Um, never wanted to know if a guy had a fat d*ck, or a tight one!

I do know for a fact by any definition that I am considered very slender.  5'5 108.  Slender does not mean attractive BTW. Attractiveness comes in all sizes and personalities.

I completely get how guys are with size... some like small, some like medium, some like full...  All it is is a preference.  Much like some of us providers will not see guys under a certain age etc.

Does not mean it is right in any sense.  Just saying that everyone has different opinions of attractiveness.  I have noticed being around men so much that quite a number of them never look above the shoulders... or care about personality.  

There are women out there who looks the most attractive as a full woman.  They would look UGLY if they were a size 2.  There are women who are slender and if they went out and gained weight they would look UGLY.  It's all about bone structure.  I know men who have no interest in slender women.  Personally I do not like skinny women either.  

I think previous thread more or less meant that guys were upset with being shown old photos that are inaccurate.  Not so much about bashing anyone for their weight.  As GaGambler pointed out... why can't girls and guys be more honest about themselves.  I find it hilarious when a guy will tell me his is a "10".  I think to myself, He does not even know what I personally find attractive.  His idea of attractive is not always my idea of attractive.  The thing about ladies who out right lie about themselves- you are loosing business on the guys who wanted you for who you really are.  Those types of guys will more then likely become regulars because you were who they wanted.  

I wish people would have more pride in themselves.  There is just something about any lady who is sure of themselves.  Of course I am a lady who hates any BS games  Take me for me or leave.  (Gee, I am not a b*tch- just honest of who I am)  If I was going to be an actress- my happy ass would sure as hell be making millions in movies lol.  I would ditch this career real quick.

is either flawed or is scaled for a perfect world.I would love to live in a world where you are considered average. If you are average, I just became very attracted to average. lol

I'm an expert in these matters, and I'd say that you're right where you belong.

Re: Carrie, I took a look at some of your pics. You, my dear, . . .

look fabulous.  Wish I lived closer.

mdkiller's formula versus the BMI formula: interpretation

has the difference you've noted. both have a geometric interpretation:

the BMI formula is a ratio of the mass to an area given by the square of the height. it is interpretable as a linear density with respect to a cylinder whose diameter and length is given as the height. it can therefore be interpreted as a packing density with respect to a cylinder that contains the person.

mdkiller's formula uses a ratio of mass to a volume estimated by the height. it is interpretable as a packing density. given a sphere that the person can fit inside, how much of the sphere is occupied by that person.

whether using a rectangle (BMI) or a sphere (mdkiller) to calculate the packing fraction with respect to the specific reference volume should make less difference than setting the thresholds properly between the categories. conceptually i think that mdkiller's formula has advantages under the packing fraction interpretation.

i would argue from the fact that Carrie Hillcrest's resul as being slightly in the average range would indicate that mdkiller should revise the boundary between slim and average up a bit.

12lb of carry on

L