ARE you FAT or slim


You this math I may of posted it be before

Wight in pounds divide by height in inches cube times 10000

Less then 4 slim 4 to 6 average 6 to 9 fat 9+ very fat


(W/(H^3)) *C

I truly hope that MDkiller has been unmoderated, he is just what we needed on a Sunday afternoon.

There is something wrong with this theory. My numbers don't work.

I got 4.19, but I wouldn't consider myself average.

So GA what is he saying?

I haven't laughed this hard in a LONG ASS time!!!

This crazy chick blasted me on PM, but it's all good cuz mdkiller puts it all in perspective!

Buddy! Life is good!!!

He is absolutely FUNNY AS HELL!!!

Unfortunately, far too many people and institutions think that weight/height ratio is indicative of whether or not a person is overweight, obese, etc.

In many cases -- probably the vast majority -- they are pretty close.

But also in many cases, they are not. People with a lot of muscle tend to reveal the problems with those formulas and tests because muscle weighs more than fat.

Why do you keep getting in my face? What the hell did I ever do to you?

Fuck, I'm having a good time and you keep crushing my groove.

Let me know what I did or said so I can try to rectify it.

-- Modified on 8/23/2009 4:25:13 PM

So is this a question about weight vs height or d*ck size?  Um, never wanted to know if a guy had a fat d*ck, or a tight one!

I do know for a fact by any definition that I am considered very slender.  5'5 108.  Slender does not mean attractive BTW. Attractiveness comes in all sizes and personalities.

I completely get how guys are with size... some like small, some like medium, some like full...  All it is is a preference.  Much like some of us providers will not see guys under a certain age etc.

Does not mean it is right in any sense.  Just saying that everyone has different opinions of attractiveness.  I have noticed being around men so much that quite a number of them never look above the shoulders... or care about personality.  

There are women out there who looks the most attractive as a full woman.  They would look UGLY if they were a size 2.  There are women who are slender and if they went out and gained weight they would look UGLY.  It's all about bone structure.  I know men who have no interest in slender women.  Personally I do not like skinny women either.  

I think previous thread more or less meant that guys were upset with being shown old photos that are inaccurate.  Not so much about bashing anyone for their weight.  As GaGambler pointed out... why can't girls and guys be more honest about themselves.  I find it hilarious when a guy will tell me his is a "10".  I think to myself, He does not even know what I personally find attractive.  His idea of attractive is not always my idea of attractive.  The thing about ladies who out right lie about themselves- you are loosing business on the guys who wanted you for who you really are.  Those types of guys will more then likely become regulars because you were who they wanted.  

I wish people would have more pride in themselves.  There is just something about any lady who is sure of themselves.  Of course I am a lady who hates any BS games  Take me for me or leave.  (Gee, I am not a b*tch- just honest of who I am)  If I was going to be an actress- my happy ass would sure as hell be making millions in movies lol.  I would ditch this career real quick.

I'm with you, MP - this whole thread is hilarious

is either flawed or is scaled for a perfect world.I would love to live in a world where you are considered average. If you are average, I just became very attracted to average. lol

You men tell us what 8"s is when in reality it's 4"s...You tell us how big You are...but I think hmmm...seems small...so You men have confused me...I don't know what small...average...or big really is

or you can be a 7 with a lot of muscle and almost no body fat.

My chest is nine inches larger than my waist, I can benchpress my a lot more than my weight or squat three times as much, and my body fat is so low that I can't float, but I'm a 5.1 lol

Don't worry about the hate mail, I know I don't, but believe it or not I get more supporting mail than hate mail by far.

It's all good, remember this place is supposed to be fun. If MDkiller doesn't remind us of that, I don't know who will.

out of hat and decided to mess with me?

It ain't happenin' lady! I'm in too good a mood! Go pick on someone else!

PEACE!!!

If you can't feel it, it's too small. If you can't fit it in, it's too big.

If the man is giving you a thousand bucks, than it is just right. lol

Thank You

I seem to remember you adding me to a "Must Miss" list.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=326985&boardID=12&page=

Yes it was a compliment and just because a person is on my "must miss list" doesn't mean I can't be attracted to her. lol

I meant every word I said on that and most other posts I have made, I refuse to "jump through hoops" just for the purpose of jumping through hoops. That said, you're still hott. lol

FWIW if you "asked" me to put my donation in an envelope I would be happy to comply. If you "demanded" it, no matter how hott I found you I would just move on to the next woman that I found attractive. No offense, but I don't respond well to demands. Requests yes, demands no.

I love that Dude - that's a keeper

...to eat a damn sammich! Those interested in feeding me said damn sammich can see my website for dinner date rates.

I'm a little on the scrawny side, but I am in general satisfied with how I look. I'm healthy, active, and happy, and that's what counts.

I'm an expert in these matters, and I'd say that you're right where you belong.

If she were right where she belongs, she would not be 800 miles away from me. lol

...on Mad Men has given me a complex.

Sweet Jesus.

-- Modified on 8/23/2009 5:17:05 PM

Kick back, have a few. Go back to the time when you were easily amused. Take the blinders off and just roooolll with it!

You'll feel better! Trust me!

MP

You are DEFINITELY not scrawny! Quite yummy actually! But would still like to do the dinner thing, if you feel the need! Then dessert after!

According to the Urban Dictionary, thick is defined as...

1. THICK GIRL
A thick girl is a girl who is an above average size. However she is not fat. She is solid. One way to see test is to slap her ass.........If it jiggles then she's more fat than thick . If it doesnt, you my friend have a thick girl

2. THICK GIRL:
(thiK gûrl) adj.
1. A word coming from modern Black Pop Culture. It is simply defined as one (female of the negroid race) with a large buttox. Also, one who does not have access fat, but is not skinny either...Her measurements were 36-25-34.

---

I will not be forced to adhere to the expectations of some cultural groups. If I choose to be smaller, it is because *I* want to be. Otherwise, I am appreciated by many for my curves.

Thank you to my friends who appreciate me simply for me and do not look at me as a number or dress size.

(By the way, my dress size is 10, which is smaller than the average American woman, 14.)

Cheers!
Gia

Having some muscle mass will usually throw any of these things off.

Weight lifters come out as obese on most charts.

FTR, 5.2, anyway I prefer athletic to average.

It produces a reasonable range, but I think it's more optimistic (one may get a better score under this index on the slim side):

Body Mass Index has 1/H^2 relationship with the index; this index has 1/H^3 relationship with its index.

Sometimes we take this stuff too seriously.  LMAO.  Way to go MD.

look fabulous.  Wish I lived closer.

Fat or Slim just isn't enough.  How about helping me come up with some new terms to describe us ladies.

Hugs, Betty

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=5195&boardID=4&page=1

has the difference you've noted. both have a geometric interpretation:

the BMI formula is a ratio of the mass to an area given by the square of the height. it is interpretable as a linear density with respect to a cylinder whose diameter and length is given as the height. it can therefore be interpreted as a packing density with respect to a cylinder that contains the person.

mdkiller's formula uses a ratio of mass to a volume estimated by the height. it is interpretable as a packing density. given a sphere that the person can fit inside, how much of the sphere is occupied by that person.

whether using a rectangle (BMI) or a sphere (mdkiller) to calculate the packing fraction with respect to the specific reference volume should make less difference than setting the thresholds properly between the categories. conceptually i think that mdkiller's formula has advantages under the packing fraction interpretation.

i would argue from the fact that Carrie Hillcrest's resul as being slightly in the average range would indicate that mdkiller should revise the boundary between slim and average up a bit.

done this way:

Your Weight in Lbs divided by your Height in Inches Squared
Multiply the result by 703

Body Mass Index & Comment
18.5-24.9    Healthy
25-29.9    Overweight
30-39.9    Obese
40+    Morbidly Obese

Where did you find your calculation?  I've not seen that before!


BTW, I'm not too fat.....just too short!!!!!  LOL

I am BBW and, as such,  have my fair share of devotees.

We must also remember that a slim to average range BMI does not necessarily mean you live a  healthy lifestyle!

but that turned me on!  The mind is a beautiful and sexy thing!    

Average....but, then again, I am Above Average if you check out my hips and tits!

i'm banned from cattle ranches....

the beeves occasionally turn into instant jerky whenever i crack a joke.

12lb of carry on

L