I really feel that I need to stick up for myself. I am a provider and I go by the name Angelina. I always get great reviews and shit I deserve it because I am a good provider. I knew eventually I would get a bad reviews someday cause lets face it you can't make everyone happy all the time. I just want people to know that these 2 guys that wrote me a bad review are just mad that I did not like them and I really do enjoy my clients. Even if I am in a bad mood, I am always able to spark up my personality to please.
The movieland guy did happen to see me at 4 in the morning and I had already seen 3 clients and I was tired of him calling me and begging to see me not to mention the million trillion emails he sent me and flabby, I don't think so as everyone knows who has seen me I have an ass that is like a hand magnet and I m sorry if the little drugged out skinny asian boy (they usually like very thin women or girls I mean}cant appreciate that ass of mine.
And as for that other guy, Well excuse me for not wanting to have a smelly guy all over me. His body order was so bad I wanted to be sick. But no I did'nt want to hurt his feelings so I stayed and this is the way I'm appreciated. I just cannot believe what they said about me but don't listen to them cause I have it going on, as you can see from all the other reviews that I have gotten. Hopefully those two jerks will not ruin my advertising . I love the erotic review its how I get most of buissness. Thanks for letting me get this off my chest
Love you All
Angelina

What is most interesting to me (after reading through the reviews) is that almost every single good review was written by someone who only written ONE review. In other words one time reviewers....

Something smells very fishy here to me (as one reviewer said actually lol)

I tend to believe the latest BAD review from the guy who has reviewed other escorts....


Just my two cents

GD

Angelina, be sure to post this objection on the regional board for your location, so your client pool will be aware of it.

And for now, until we get drollere's CONTESTED REVIEW warning in place, submit a problem report on your profile and let TER know that the review or reviews were a lie, with malicious intent. They may be able to remove the offending review for you, and in this case, drollere will know about it, since we’ve had this discussion here.

I agree with drollere’s ideas about the database, but for now, false reviews cannot be allowed to stand!

I am in complete agreement that false reviews (good ones & bad ones) need to be removed, with this stipulation...that they be "proved" false & not merely removed because the provider wants them removed.  

This is a sword that should cut two ways...everyone is in support of the reliable provider, as they should be--but what if the reviewer has been shown to be reliable as well??  Just as there are ladies that I feel are the real thing, there are also reviewers that I have a good degree of confidence in.

Real "proof" can be near impossible to discern, but to not take the reviewers history into account & merely be cautious to the point that it's always "err on the side of the provider" hardly seems the best answer either.

I would think that if history & reputation was clearly on the side of the gal, remove it...if it would favor the guy equally as clearly, let it stand.  If it was a situation where probable reliability favored neither, the let it stand with the CONTESTED label as has been suggested.  

But let's not overdue that one either!  Personally, if I had a review that I'd submitted on a gal with limited history & it was either taken down or hit with the contested label...I would damn well be very pissed.

I believe that TER is a tool for those who pursue the hobby.  A tool that allows gentlemen to avoid ROB's, and to find new talent.  TER is not, in my opinion, a forum to showcase "providers"!  I say err on the side of the reviewer, not the "provider."

Why not post both the review and the provider's response?  That way at least both parties have their say.  While I agree with the notion of this being a site intended for the hobbyist, not the provider, we can't have one without the other, can we?  As I see it, the more information (including the tone of the response) the better.

Gmar,
extreme newbie and wanting to know more

I agree...though I haven't looked at the reviews myself...if what you are saying is true, then, yeah, it does look awful suspicious....

Myself, I don't even acknowledge reviews by guys who have less than 3. My rule is that the provider has to have 3 reviews from guys who have DONE 3 reviews..and not all girls from the same website / mall / agency.

That gives me a bit more confidence that the girls (or the owner) aren't just writing reviews for each other, or having friends do it. It isn't a pervect system, but it works for me...

because, of course, we all know how helpful a false review can be to the hobbyist.