Yes, another major doxxing and outing by a provider. This time, a "top" provider.

delete his booking form response and block him. No one would have been the wiser. Yet she chose to be a dangerous provider and expose his RWI on X for likes, rt's and sympathy/comic relief.  

Honestly funny replies, but she should have definitely blocked out his info. A provider left a veiled threat to doxx me if I didn't leave her a good review, and it still scares me enough to not post it. Seeing things like this happen continually erodes my trust in the whole screening process.

Just wondering how many providers give clients the same info they request? Just wondering

I’m an honest provider with integrity who seeks lifetime friends with benefits, so I have no problem sharing my information with a serious gentleman who is transferring funds in large quantities. 🗣️

they are honest, have integrity, and are looking for long-term regulars . . . . . until a customer does something to piss them off.  I'm sure there is a threshold at which you would consider doxing someone as well, but it may be much higher than the low trigger points some ladies have been shown to have, so trying to apply a one-size-fits-all policy to everyone is a fool's errand, and with these kinds of experiences being reported almost weekly here, it's probably happening a lot more than we even know of.  Just as you have every right to claim that you would protect a customer's privacy, a customer has a right to protect his own privacy, and if that's a deal-breaker, then he will be spending his money with someone else. Since I have no idea where the trigger point is to get doxed with ANY particular provider, I will always choose to err on the side of caution and rely only on references from ladies who know me.

"I accidentally liked your post.  Unfortunately for me I can’t take it back."

It could have been taken more than one way.  Now that you have explained now you intended it to read, disregard my post.  

-- Modified on 8/24/2023 8:30:22 PM

If she supports what Amy did, will she do the same to others?

I'm not saying she's right but aren't you told NOT TO bring up sex until you have been screened?

Just to be clear I don’t support doxing clients until it’s really serious then it would be a conversation with people in real life not the internet. I commented on her tweet doesn’t mean I would do that.. I don’t entertain time wasters, just block and move on.

at the expense of the guy who was doxxed. If you knew it was wrong, why comment in support of Ms. Taylor? Did you report the tweet to X? Did you tell Ms Taylor the doxxing was wrong? Did you ask her to take down the tweet?

She said that this guy actually called the police, not just threatened to. It wasn’t in the main thread but she mentioned it a couple of times. If that’s how it got to that point, can you blame her?

Has anyone but me even bothered to report it and try to save this guy whatever additional pain he may receive?

I’m not saying it’s right, but he should’ve thought about all of that before sending her all those nasty messages.

while i wouldn't of handled it the way she did, he brought up calling the cops!

She said later that he followed through and actually called on her.

conveniently left out he threaten to sick the police on her when all she did was cut and paste her into to him.

For condoning : not only threatening a provider with calling the cops, but actually calling the cops on them for no reason.

Whilst  perusing  twitter,  X,  (whatever  the  site's   moniker  is  these  days),  
prompted  by  the  "0P"  @UnnamedOne's   justified  statement  and  links  
regarding  said  Escort's  shenanigans,  I  then  scrolled  through  much  of  her  
Profile  timeline  thereupon.

so she is definitely habitual in her maliciousness.

with 4 doxxings on her timeline in the last few weeks. She does it out of maliciousness, and is deliberately disproportionate to the minor insult.

Seems you condone any punishment for any crime. You cops blather is bullshit.

Let me see if I read this correctly.

If you actually look at the screenshots on her timeline, she doxxess idiots. Why are you asking us to stand up for idiots?  

over the past two years for Amy. She's prolifically malicious.

-- Modified on 8/26/2023 5:35:56 AM

that you support Amy's little doxxing adventure.  

the dude is both stupid and nasty.  

for more than 2 years. It is a hollow threat, and Amy certainly knew this. This was purely personal antagonism and malice aforethought.  

You come on here slamming all these women for doxxing, most instances I totally agree with you. While I wouldn’t handle Amy’s situation the way she did, he did threaten to call the cops on her I would’ve definitely blacklisted him. I have never posted anybody’s personal information on a public forum before.

As long as they are in jurisdictions that don’t prosecute?  

Both come off like jerks are kinda doing the same thing.

A provider friend who had been around since the 00's had told me Amy Taylor was the provider who had the gun pulled on by the crazed earlier proprietor of TER about twenty years ago. So I'm sure some oldtimers here remember this infamous anecdote from back then. And that Amy Taylor used to be one of the top ter ranked ter and high-est end provider ladies since back in the mid 00's. As mentioned, plenty had since moved off of TER but still have ad sites on the flavor trend sites of recent years such as tryst.link , taken over the defunct cityvibe, or also on the twitter-sphere part of the hobby advertising now. My take is that her doxxing behavior is so unprofessional and unbecoming of a former top ranked provider. I had also noticed some of the top regional or nationally ranked TER providers had also been infected by today's woked and entitlement social engineered culture.  

I used to follow Amy on social media until I saw her regularly complaining about guys, and doxxing guys who she thought were time wasters. Mind you, she hadn’t even met these guys, she just didn’t like that they wouldn’t comply with her strict screening process through her website. She regularly posted their texts on Twitter and Instagram, sometimes blacking out their contact information, other times including their names and contact information.  
.
About this same time I realized that all of the pictures she posted on social media were stock photos of resort destinations, private jets, and other scenes meant to impress. The one thing that was missing from all of the pictures: Amy. She was never in the pictures because she wasn’t there. She simply posted generic pictures to imply that she lived a luxurious lifestyle. It’s a practice I’ve seen from a few high profile providers trying to give off the illusion that they live a jet-setting high profile lifestyle as a way to justify their exorbitant prices. In reality it’s usually bullsh*t.
.
Eventually I stopped following Amy a few years ago. Doesn’t surprise me what she did to this hobbyist because she’s been doing it for years. In my opinion she’s a provider to avoid like the plague. Overpriced and dangerous.  
.
I agree with the prevailing sentiment in this thread: doxxing is only acceptable where a hobbyist has physically abused a provider or has stealthed a provider. Anything else is easily remedied by blocking or privately blacklisting a hobbyist who a provider considers a time waster or who sends inappropriate messages or whose company a provider doesn’t enjoy.

unless there is physical harm, sexual assault or robbery  - the worst types of things. In my view, this was not one of those situations.  

doxxing was unnecessary.  A block or even a blacklist would suffice, and never be mentioned by me.  

He threatened to call the cops. Dumb move on his part, but doesn’t justify the doxxing.

I recall, late 90's early 2000''s I reached out to her, yes she's been around since then. I was transitioning from stripper world to escort world. I recall her tag was 400 then. When we spoke I found her to be very cordial and somewhat business like. We talked to get a feel for each other and she came to conclusion that maybe we weren't a good fit. At that time I was ok with it and I could sense that she was right. My playful nature most likely turned her off and I think she was looking more for a whale then some guppy like me. But she was cool and in after thought, she was probably right.
But as time went on, I recall some drama involving her. So now, I can guess that she's more of a no nonsense kinda chick...and time has probably taken it's toll on her.

@RegencyHobbyist
Sir,  You  took  the  words  out  of  my  mouth  precisely,  when  I  perused  "X"  to  investigate  this  
thread,  and  to  latterly  comment  on  escort  "AT"!

Stuff like this just makes me avoid her and the cackling hens supporting her. I’m sure the feeling is mutual .

and anyone that calls the police for no REASON deserves to be doxed.

But now that we all know you think this is a normal behavior, I would suggest YOU be blocked and blacklisted.

I sincerely appreciate this post. Too often when the lady is an asshole, everyone rushes to take her side. I certainly don't want to meet anyone who thinks doxing is okay. Block the guy and move on.

So let me get this straight.

Just stop.  You sound like an unhinged lover.

Funny, as I read your repeated excuses and justifications I was thinking you sound more like her “manager” than an interested hobbyist.

Enough already.

As if the COPS DON'T KNOW WHO SHE IS.

I will be releasing a book soon about clients, prostitution, law enforcement, and the many tricks and traps.  After reading all this madness in this thread, I see that you ladies are making a big deal about it.  Amy is not a top provider, hooking is hooking. You women place too much emphasis on her and it blows up her phat ego.

Why are you commenting on a 2 year old thread? Is this just to advertise your book in which you are hinting you have a chapter about AT?