TER General Board

Agreed -- it's absurd & ambiguous. Also the list is tiny.
Fuckhead_in_Buckhead 1680 reads
posted
3 / 16

It's listed in the "Review Section".  Can ANYONE please  explain?   Board Admin???

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/providersHide.asp

tooshillamockingbird 494 reads
posted
4 / 16
Fuckhead_in_Buckhead 196 reads
posted
5 / 16
tooshillamockingbird 191 reads
posted
6 / 16
Fuckhead_in_Buckhead 214 reads
posted
7 / 16

No one of authority  (ie Admins)  explains it. Only idiot speculation.

DerrBl 38 Reviews 242 reads
posted
11 / 16

To me, the problem with calling it "Women with something to hide" is that it's ambiguous.

Is she trying to hide the fact that she's really a man?

Is she trying to hide the fact that she's a vice cop?

Is she trying to hide the fact that she's pregnant?  Has black teeth? A pimp that will shake you down?

Is she hiding her past as a Soviet spy?

Does she not want anyone to know that she's in an al Qaeda sleeper cell?

Maybe she's just hiding a can of silly string behind her back, and she's going to spray it at you while you're fishing in your jacket pocket for your envelope?

Those are the kinds of things that come to mind when I think of a woman who has something to hide.

If the idea is to have a category for women who don't want reviews or aren't permitted to have them due to their behavior, then the category should probably be called something that more readily reflects that.  Maybe "Unreviewable Women"?

UnattractiveManWithCash 168 reads
posted
12 / 16
Fuckhead_in_Buckhead 180 reads
posted
13 / 16
JimmyWithTatas 204 reads
posted
14 / 16
Fuckhead_in_Buckhead 150 reads
posted
15 / 16
Blackwulf 149 reads
posted
16 / 16


"Not that is anything wrong with that" (Seinfeld)

Register Now!