Yeah right. lol

Other than the obvious difference in the time....
I have booked a couple of two hour date for the first time. I would be interested in how hobbyists and providers compare these to 1 hour appointments. Is the chemistry different? The pace? I imaging it's probably a similar amount of intimate activity, with more time added for conversation, but I'd like to hear others's opinions. Which do you prefer?  Thanks?

gained experience in the P4P world, I have found that I enjoy 2-hr. (or longer) dates if I have chemistry with the lady.

1 hour is rushed when meeting someone for the 1st time.  Chemistry does not happen instantly.  

One hour does feel rushed, and if can not get off twice in one hour, but in two hours I can usually do so.

Plus most gals structure their rates to make two hours more affordable.  

I enjoy the company and conversation about as much as the sex with many gals I see.

it takes me 1 hr and 59 min to get hard and 1 min to pop.

I am not speaking in absolutes here, so no one get all butt hurt, but the MAJORITY through 10 years of research has revealed this...

But I will buy the bull crap about "liking" to do bruches, lunches, and dinners to develop good chemistry, when they do it OTC..

That's the difference. If everyone of us could make 2k per date, um, we would be doing it. You can love your job all you want, but anyone saying they don't want more money for a service provided is either full of shit, or has something wrong with their head. My Doctor loves his job too, but I bet if he got a raise he would not turn it down. He might do more probono work, but he would probably still take the money. Why? Because if he has more money, that's more money to help the less fortunate. If he can feed his family easier, he can use some of that extra to give to others in need.  

I cant meet someone, chat a bit to get to know her and be comfortable, and then get an idea of how compatible we'll be sexually in an hour. I really can't do it in two hours. In two hours I can at least tell if I really want to see her again.  

I've had clients where they should've booked 2 hours because time flew by so fast with them while some appointments I have we still get along well but anything longer than an hour is a bit drawn out.  

Thanks for the well thought out reply. I imagine here will be some Butthurt, but that's why I like reading your posts. Maybe I'll make it to Florida one day.

I agree with LONDON and have a few points to add.....

......going by. I have more than enough time to enjoy the moment, with plenty of talk and foreplay. One hour meetings are always hurried for me, like I am going to miss out on something, or it just flies by and ends abruptly. I would love to see what a three hour date is like, and hope to do one soon.

I just have found in the one hour appointments I don't get into as much. It's quite nerve racking to meet someone new and then basically just perform within 5 minutes. It's unnatural to me. I'm trying to balance this with my desire not to throw my money away. In the end, however, I have found in my non-hobby endeavours that when I spend more money, my experiences are usually much better. I guess I'm figuring it will work the same in this world.  
As far as ladies liking more money, I'm sure they do, but I can't completely call BS. Given my previous experiences, I imagine I'll be more likely to repeat if I spend a little more time initially. Which in the long run is more money, even if I only book one hours after that. I imagine its a little easier on the provider to make a good first impression.
That being said, I imagine more money is better too. I would think a 2 hour appt with one guy is much easier than two one hour appointments with different guys, even though the money is more likely the same.
There are lots of times I love my job, but it doesn't mean I also don't like money and wouldn't love more. The two are not mutually exclusive.
He'll, maybe I'll try the 2 hour appointments and decide that's not enough...

There are many hourly clients who do not apply to my theory, so it is not always the TIME they buy, but who they are and how they approach the business. Guys can still book 2 hours and want nothing but sex...look at CPA bwahhahaa. So, there is more of a difference between guys who ONLY book for sex, and those who book to take a gal to dinner, watch her sleep, etc. and the time min. may not always have something to do with that. Many guys who book hours can only afford that, so for those guys, I would not hold the same theory, as they are still nice guys, but on a budget. They are happy with one pop and making that hour last, vs. trying to pound a gal to death getting 2 plus pops.  

I want my dates to feel like dates, not a quick dental exam with some drilling.  Over ten years now and I looooove my "work".  How can that happen?  I insist on enjoying the time too!  Creating a connection, building the energy, being able to trade massage, soak in a hot tub and chat, and some exceptional orgasms... sorry, there is no way for half of that to happen in an hour.

I used to, though. I only see two clients who originally booked me for 1-hour time slots. One is just really nice and very attached to me...the other one started with a 1-hour date but then booked longer dates after that short first one. Both are exceptions to the general rule. Most 1-hour clients will never book anything else. They think that they pay for the hour, and everything else should be free (including cuddle time and even post-coital massage). Their attitude is that they pay for SEX, and generally, as London pointed out...they will work you like a team of oxen. Yes.

Its part and parcel of the "Girl Friend Experience" package you are selling..

I made a rule with myself that when I see a lady for the first time it's a one hour date. I've been with ladies for the first time for 2 hours and kind of regretted it, because we didn't hit it off on a personal level or she wasn't as advertised. Ever since I made that rule with myself I've wished I'd booked longer with first dates. I suspect that I'm getting better at choosing providers for myself, everyone's tastes and expectations are different. So, my preference is 2 or more hours, more play time and a more relaxed date.

Yup, exactly. I can perform the same acronyms in an hour, but I cannot provide the same type of service. An hour will never be a GFE to me...never. It's a fkin PSE unless the guy is old as hell and nuts in 10 min. then wants to cuddle and chat for the next 50 min. Trying to jam in a million actvities with only time for 10 min. of chit chat while you wipe cum off your face, is NOT GFE.

NO reason for a guy to waste one hour, much less two on someone he does not want to be with.

While it is certainly possible to hit it off well on a 1 hr date for the first time, 1.5 -2 hr dates for me are the bee's knees in terms of pacing. It just allows the date to unfold organically and leisurely ; however,  It does not matter if the date is 1 or 2 -chemistry is chemistry

In most cases, the latter. I'm not seeing my providers to be my girl friend.

My first thought in this was that it seemed silly to drop a bunch of money on someone if never met or even seen in real life. The risk of a dud just seemed to big. But then thinking about it, my experiences with the one hour were lacking. Also, I think that ladies that are more amenable to multi-hour appointments are probably more into what I am looking for. "Pops" are nice, but much more fun in the context of getting to know someone. At least for me. I'm definitely not looking for a girlfriend, but I certainly am not there just to do the deed and leave.  Nothing against that, and it might be ok with someone I was familiar with, but it has been to hard to get into it for one hour.  
This discussion has made me think I should up it to 3+ hours, but I suppose I should not get carried away.!
Thanks for all the advice.

I like to take a shower first, then chat for a bit. Gives you enough time for a couple rounds and chit chat in between. One hour is too rushed. Sometimes I will go for one hour if I'm seeing an agency girl or someone with not many reviews for the first time. I've had times where I booked two hours and wish I didn't, left early at 1.5 hrs.

It gives you time for catching up, maybe relaxing with a drink and 2 or 3 pops. I find (as others have said) the more you give the more you get. I usually feel rushed with a one hour date, and Im only there to feel good and have fun

I don't, I pay for sex, pure and simple. Don't get me wrong, i like the company of a woman, I enjoy having dinner dates, sleeping in the arms of a beautiful woman etc, but what I pay for is the sex. I don't have the slightest problem getting someone to let me buy them dinner, I just don't see the need to pay for it.

That said, I probably do more overnight dates than anyone here on TER, I've had three in the last four nights, but the rate I am paying is so absurdly low by American standards as to be meaningless to me. (I've paid on average $300 for my overnight dates), and yes they will fuck me after dinner as well. sorry LR. Actually some of the time we just order room service and eat it in bed, a few crumbs in the bed doesn't bother me too much. lol

At the end of each of the last four 3-hour sessions I've had, I asked the lady if she could go another hour.  She wasn't able to.  

which is just fine by me.

It's funny, I don't mind a bit running up a thousand dollar bar or dinner tab, but the idea of paying some woman hundreds of dollars an hour just to "keep me company" bothers me for some reason. The same way as I won't bat an eye at a hundred dollar steak in a restaurant as long as the quality is there, but if that same steak is thirty dollars a pound in the market, No fucking way!!! I guess we all have our own way of looking at things.

and yeah, you and I can get drunk together anytime, even if you are a bit "pudgy" roflmfao

and yes, if you hadn't noticed I am already PUI.

Lucky devil...overnights for 300? I would not even show you my tits for that lol. Well, maybe if you get me drunk.

I booked my guy a four hour dinner date for his first time. He liked making a connection on a personal level and found the physical play more enjoyable for it. This is about fantasy and I wanted the whole package for him. That said, I spent A LOT of time researching. I took everything you guys have taught me and applied it. Didn't worry about price, instead paid attention to chemistry and sexual appeal. When the provider was booked I was confident our choice was a good one.  It was a very good date.

I really do not care or want to work that hard to pop twice.

I am in. But, haven’t found anyone yet. All want to lay around and talk and get know each other. For what?

On a second meeting I sometimes do longer.

transaction.

work for your money, I like that.

I'm a relative newbie but I've never booked less than 90 minutes and that was when I lost my "cherry".  For me, it's both.  Obviously I wouldn't be there without the shared fun time but I find that I really enjoy the conversation and getting to know the young lady with whom I'm visiting.  I've found them all to be intriguing, interesting, and of of course very friendly.  

when I first started  I tried multi hour dates with a few ladies and got stood up more than once (cancelled on) so it soured me to them.  I've had a few since then but  I don't see the value in it since I end up paying her to talk. I can talk to friends, I don't need an escort for that.

1 hour dates are 60 minutes.
2 hour dates are 120 minutes.

I've been hobbying just under 9 months and I have yet to take an hour. I hate the rushed feeling. Its like some of the gals here say...sometimes it takes a while to get comfortable before the festivities begin. The way I see it..a provider is a provider. Either you can make her feel like a provider...or you can make her feel like like a person, by taking the time to get to know her a bit. Not just the superficial banter I'm sure goes on, but to really get to know her and she gets that you really do want to know her. The gals are sharp enough to know if you're laying it on or you really are sincere in your conversation. She's not just a sex object. Not only does it enrich the session and make it better than just a quick lay...though I know that is exactly what some are looking for. Nothing wrong with that, I just don't happen to roll like that.  

or presents... (-:

I think it is great that there were actually some real, thoughtful responses to this question.

Lets' see them titties rofl

One hour dates go by toooo quick...and it can feel like a wham bam type of date.
(okay for those who are into the who wham bam thing) or Okay for those who are on a time/budget crunch.

I agree with you which is why I always go with the option of seeing one gentleman for a nice longer length date once a week over seeing 15 guys in a week at an hour each. Not to say I don't have my regular favorites that I always try to accomodate but that's rare  

Totally agree.  I've actually started 90 minutes and those have been excellent as well. The hour is just too short.