In the vein of talking about the scoring system. Is a 1, 2, and 3 pretty much useless? I think the lowest score I've given is 3 for looks and maybe same for performance. I think a girl would have to be a leper to get a 1 for looks. Then a smelly deformed hairy pussy and bitching through a session and cutting it short to get a 1 for performance.

If you get egregiously baited and switched by a TBTBT add, some say that's on you, should have known better, but I've seen some that are over the line misleading.   Deserves a 1 or less if it's bad enough to force a walk.  

So that is why you always have to read the review to find out if this is the gal for you or not.

7's and below aren't even considered.  Anything below an 8 is generally bad.  Most 8's and 9's are significantly less attractive than ladies that I have dated IRL when in my prime or close to it (an important qualifier).  So I usually want to see at least 9's across the board.  Otherwise there is a good chance that I will be paying to see a lady that is less attractive than ladies that I have seen/see IRL.

-- Modified on 7/22/2020 11:13:28 AM

Would you be ANY more likely to see a woman with a bunch of 3's for either performance or appearance than you would a woman with a bunch of 1's? For that matter, let's extend that up to even a 5 I would NEVER see a TER 5, Truth be told where it comes to appearance at least even a TER 7 is pretty homely most of the time.

calling you out for no reviews when he has only two . . . . . . from 2009.  Wonder how many bottles of lotion there has been since then?    Bwahahahahahahaha

When EVERBODY knows that's like asking about my life in the church. He has no sex life.

Under my old handle Phunhog. The situation in question was a supposed duo where we met in a seedy hotel and one lady refused to let me so much as touch her. it was awful.

Getting past the flame war above... :p  
.
Despite TER's attempt to quantify some scores by 'requiring' the provider to offer certain services AND actually provide those services during the reviewers' session, the reality is each reviewer can only provide a score based on their personal expectations and experience. If you get a BBBJ for the first time in your life, you are likely to give a higher score for performance and looks (assuming you enjoyed it).  So IMO the actual scores are less relevant that the review write up.  
.
I prefer spinner types, especially shorter Latinas and Asians and especially submissive personalities. If I see a 10/10 or 9/9 review for a provider who is 5'10", 135 lbs, with triple D's, I'm still probably going to pass. She may be the greatest sex partner on the planet for that reviewer, but she's just not my type. And that same reviewer may score a 5'1", 98 lbs LBFM 22 year old as a 6/7 and complain she's flat and doesn't know how to please a man. But I'll favorite that provider immediately and look for a reason to visit her city if she's not local.  
.
Having said all that, since I generally filter my searches to only include my preferred type, scanning for the high scores is a short cut to START evaluating search results.  
.
Life is good.
.
The Cat

My lowest was a 4 / 3. She truly MIGHT have been ok if I was very drunk and she really was a waste of my time.  

For example, my former cable provider had such lousy customer service I would have given them a negative score if I could.  😁

any performance below a 5 makes the same statement.    and in looks anyone below a 5 i just turned around and left or gave her $50 for her troubles and told her to leave my hotel room.    it happens  but then i cant review them is the issue.   wish there was a category and check box for when that happens   ie  walk out on girl.

My low score reviews never got approved. Here're parts of one:
Overall Looks 9 - Model material
Services Delivered As Promised? No
On Time: Yes
Overall Attitude: spoiled bitchiness
Overall Atmosphere: measured, not pleasured
Overall Performance: 2 - Should have stayed home
.
General: " ... [I] was greeted by C----- who was wearing a nice bikini. She is beautiful to look at. But that's about all you get. It was all downhill from there. A spoiled tease with too many rules."  
.
Juicy: "As beautiful as C------ is, it doesn't make up for this being my worst experience ever. ... [long, detailed review] ... C------ is a beautiful TEASE. ... Enjoy her pictures but avoid her companionship."

The lowest rating I ever gave was for Kali (from Michelle's Escorts, Chicago).  It was a 6, but it should have been a 5, but I was afraid I'd get blacklisted from the agency for giving a bad review.

An experience can be a 4 even if the girl is a 10. I think if we are all going to do reviews we cant hold back and need to be honest from our experiences no matter what. Looks are subjective but ive seen girls that I would rate a 6 in the past that would easily of given an 8 or higher if they bothered to care enough to prepare for a session properly. Or vice versa I've sessioned with a couple ladies if they were at least somewhat communcative, punctual, non rushing & tried just a bit to make an effort what id consider a 4 could of easily been a 7-8 or higher.

repeat to try to improve the "connection" or not?  

I think the lowest score looks wise I've given is maybe a 5? Performance a 3.

I am absolutely guilty of raising a look score by a point if the lady performs spectacularly. But I'm confident I have not gone the other way.  In my view of the world a beautiful woman who acts like I'm not worth her time or is just a dead fish is more exasperating than a homely chick who really tries hard.