...are protections against governmental prohibitions regarding free speech.
A private company, such as Twitter, has the right to make their own policies. Given the upcoming debates about "controlling" Big Tech platforms and the "regulation" of free speech (Section 230), it's going to be quite political in the upcoming 18-24 months. If you don't like what Twitter is doing, use a different platform.Many accounts have been kicked off for posting nude pics of tits and ass. Then these women complain about all the work they put in and the thousands, sometimes tens of thousands, of followers they lost.
OnlyFans is now kicking to off "inappropriate" material as well.
There are probably a few that get suspended but it’s not that twitter is banning them in masses. Its just not happening.
I can't help but appreciate the irony of the fact that the "woke hookers" on Twitter who have attempted to stifle any kind of speech that THEY disapprove of are now being censored themselves.
Either you support freedom of speech or you don't. Not to make this political, (yeah right. lol) but it's easy to support free speech that you agree with, supporting the rights of hookers is just one, very easy example. That said, if you truly support free speech and want to ensure that YOUR rights to free speech won't be infringed on someday, hopefully you will support the rights of people you don't agree with to have their voices heard, I think we all know who I am talking about.
Twitter has been stifling the voices of people they don't agree with for years, ironically that was just fine with the "woke Twitter Crowd" as long as it was other peoples voices being silenced. Yes, I support the right of hookers to exercise their first amendment right to free speech and "freedom of expressed". Now if these woke hookers could only support the right of OTHER people to express themselves too, then maybe something might get accomplished here.
I hate flag burning, or any disrespect to the flag.
However, everyone has the right, which I support more.
I wish others could see that viewpoint. We should stop worrying about a damn cartoon skunk.
Ok, I am up to the line and I will stop.
It's a lot harder to support speech that you abhor.
That said, it's hard not to appreciate the irony of people who make it their life's mission to put a muzzle on speech that they disagree with, having the exact same thing done to them, but I am like you where the flag burners are concerned, if I support the "woke hookers" losing their platform, I kind of cede the right to be shocked when my freedoms are trampled on as well.
Even silencing one person, no matter how much I hate what that person's point of view, in my opinion, weakens us all. I wish more would agree with me, but even those who would silence me, need to be heard. Even if it is so I can mock them for it. Banning of even the most woke and stupid of providers is a loss.
So I guess I am agreeing with the main thrust of you point of veiw. I just don't care that it is ironic that these woke sex workers are banned because they supported silencing of others. It is still a shame when any voice is silenced.
But if they are among the ones that have been TER-bashing for the past three years, its doubtful they will be very welcome. The only thing worse than being woke is being a hypocrite, yet one often leads to the other.
The vast majority of people are tired of 'woke'' and 'cancel' culture. The backlash is coming, and it won't be pretty. A 'temperature' check are the women who were coughing on the south asian Uber driver. Crowd funding of $100k for him, and two of the three passengers were either arrested or turning herself in to the police. The woman that was arrested in Las Vegas is also wanted on charges of credit card fraud and identity theft. We'll see what happens with her. She probably would have gotten a slap on the wrist for credit card fraud, but now that the spot light is on her I bet she gets to go to jail. The other is going to be exposed as a hooker.
Nah,I don't see it. Plenty of simps on other platforms that will heap praise on them and be their white knights. Once you've been treated as a queen, it's tough to go back to being constructively criticized and (gasp) reviewed. You have to have thick skin, something a lot of this new wave hookers don't have. And the willingness with which they expose personal info makes me wonder if I'll ever go to non-asian indies again.
Short answer, no.
...are protections against governmental prohibitions regarding free speech.
A private company, such as Twitter, has the right to make their own policies.
Given the upcoming debates about "controlling" Big Tech platforms and the "regulation" of free speech (Section 230), it's going to be quite political in the upcoming 18-24 months.
If you don't like what Twitter is doing, use a different platform.
Rosa Parks should have started her own bus company.
It's really easy to follow their rules if you read them its actually a short 2 paragraphs on it. you can post anal porn on twitter but it has to follow guidelines likes everything else. When i see ladies getting banned or suspended its usually a simple rule they broke.
first rule: No nudity in your profile photos
second rule: If you post any kind of nudity your profile must be marked NSFW, they have an easy button to toggle in your profile settings for this.
rule 3 and the very obvious one. No underage, no sex content depicting violence, no nudity in clearly obvious public space where other people may be present.
gang bang sure, gang band in time square NO.
It's been a great way to communicate with our client base and has been good for business. Tits and ass have been no problem as of yet. We've been using Twitter for 11 of our 12+ years.
https://twitter.com/100ProofLV
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
