I love that term (never did).  All the cool teenagers are putting it in their twitter accounts

I saw posting stating all men should boycott providers to show them who is in charge as a way to fight racism in the hobby.  Some providers are taking that no blackmen allowed off their ads. I saw on another board some white guys stated that they avoid providers like that because they are bait and switch.

Fried chicken?

Posted By: Ridgetucky

I love that term (never did).  All the cool teenagers are putting it in their twitter accounts  
   
 Anyway, a couple of days ago I put out a notice on the OH board that I was looking for a Provider.  
   
 So I get a PM from a Provider wanting to know if I was still looking.  I PMed her back the following:  
   
 1.  I contacted you before (like 2 years ago) and she stated she did not date AA men (no problem comes with the territory) ((DO NOT POST STUPID SHIT ABOUT HER CHOICE - THIS POST IS NOT ABOUT THAT))  
   
 2.  So while I am still looking our interests are not compatible (I found a ready and willing Provider who meets all of my needs)    
   
 3.  She PMs back OK sorry about that. No harm no foul.  RT is off to enjoy wife's Sunday dinner.  
   
 4.  5 hours later I get another PM stating that she is now willing to get together.  
   
 WTF Seriously!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  So this chick must have lost some $$$$$ at the casino and now it's acceptable to FUCK a Black guy because yo sorry ass can't pay the rent  
   
 Really and people call me an asshole.  The hypocrisy of some of these chicks NEVER ceases to amaze me.  
   
 RT  
   
 

Congratulations, Einstein!

you have a 90% chance of getting ripped off!!!!!!!!

Just like we do.

but you are a troll with a sense of humor. Thanks for showing these amateur trolls how it's done.

And I love me some "shrimp and grits" but I am having me some crawfish tonight, five pounds and one bottle of wine down, five more pounds and another bottle of wine to go. (oh yeah, and a pound or so of chicken gizzards boiled in the same water to boot)

Then you'll have a really fun OP to throw on the boards.

When I reminded her of her policy regarding AA men she said OK sorry.

swamps of Louisiana mud food shit.

You've lost your audience.

BwahHhahaha.
Where's London?

Just sayin'

I love collard greens southern soul-food style! So lucky to live in FL where I get plenty. I also love fried catfish.

She taking a real chance of finding the AA guy provider worry about and hurt her just because she a picks and chooses.

I am seriously hurt that you can't seem to up your game. In fact, you were so horrible you reported your own last OP to be taken down.

I stand behind my assessment of Providers.

I get it...either she sees AA men or not.  It's not about racism, it's about her changing her mind.  If you take the time to contact a provider the least you deserve is honesty.  If she doesn't see AA men, the all mighty dollar shouldn't change that.  Obviously you respect her choice regardless.

There are so many different reasons for the no BLACK guy stuff. At the beginning and end of the day, who gives a bonkey! Some of it's pure racism, some of its lack of experience being around black guys, some of its outside eyes and desires (pimps, white clients, hate group affiliations), AND some of if it's personal tastes by the provider from merely their own perspective or wishes. Like not being attracted to black guys, lol. Real shit. Any one of the above could indeed change genuinely or change due to "business expansion" efforts. Ones base of potential clients sorta speak.

Posted By: Ridgetucky

I love that term (never did).  All the cool teenagers are putting it in their twitter accounts  
   
 Anyway, a couple of days ago I put out a notice on the OH board that I was looking for a Provider.  
   
 So I get a PM from a Provider wanting to know if I was still looking.  I PMed her back the following:  
   
 1.  I contacted you before (like 2 years ago) and she stated she did not date AA men (no problem comes with the territory) ((DO NOT POST STUPID SHIT ABOUT HER CHOICE - THIS POST IS NOT ABOUT THAT))  
   
 2.  So while I am still looking our interests are not compatible (I found a ready and willing Provider who meets all of my needs)    
   
 3.  She PMs back OK sorry about that. No harm no foul.  RT is off to enjoy wife's Sunday dinner.  
   
 4.  5 hours later I get another PM stating that she is now willing to get together.  
   
 WTF Seriously!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  So this chick must have lost some $$$$$ at the casino and now it's acceptable to FUCK a Black guy because yo sorry ass can't pay the rent  
   
 Really and people call me an asshole.  The hypocrisy of some of these chicks NEVER ceases to amaze me.  
   
 RT  
   
 

Well except to poke fun at friends. I have a very good Bahamian friend, I call her "African American" just to piss her off, as she is neither African nor American.

I will admit that most "No AA men" stems from racism. I support the individual right to be racist, after all "her body, her choice on who she wants to fuck", but let's be honest, most NBA policies are racist, let's at least call it out for what it is.

As far as the second, I understand your point but some times it's not. It's just not. A lot of times yes imo too but not as much as some people would like to make it out to be. My other reasons are indeed some and do not equal a racist mindset by the provider. A lot more than some people think is my point. I won't get into the percentages because it's pointless without a scientific study but I won't necessarily disagree with you about the most. Now it also depends on what you call racism or how you define it. People have their different interpretations and definitions for it.

Now I have to hear about it here as well? Respect her wishes and move on.

When does the boycott start that forces men to see ladies of different ethnic groups?  I suspect there are at least as many men with a "no AA women" rule, but is that acceptable in this business?  I never see any outcry about it, so is a racial bias OK for men but not women?  Just asking.

but I think it highlights that the question of personal preference is not as simple as some would make it out to be (on either side of the argument).