I am not talking about guys who take these drugs for the purpose of achieving an erection...that's fkin retarded to even suggest one would prefer to deal with up, down, up, down, vs. just up. My issue is with men who cannot cum and then want to write a bad review when we dare suggest their time is up and it's not my damn fault you have issues. I did not sign up to be a machine for 400 bucks I will tell you that. The one guy I really regret seeing was on this stuff and I flat out told him his rate would never be the regular rate again for what I had to deal with. He was rock hard, really big, and it was almost a hospital visit when we were done..he still did NOT cum!
As for "setting myself up" for anything I can't verify, I can flat out stop when I want to at any time thanks. If I discover I am being lied to or manipulated, that is also just cause for an alert. Lying to see a provider is never acceptable, so think about that. That's like a provider with a no black guys policy being told the guy was white to get in the door. Another example would be lying about your age when a woman has a 35 and up rule. She has every right to do what she wants after the fact includng taking the money, and telling him to piss off!
-- Modified on 4/9/2012 9:18:31 AM
There many more guys willing and able to go 2 or 3 rounds!
I recently saw a provider post that she would not see any guys who were taking ED drugs. I presume that was because of the guy wanting MSOG which she has said previously was OK as long as it happened within the allotted time.
First, how would she know if the drugs were being used or not? It is always a bad thing to set yourself up by requiring things you have no way to verify or enforce.
Second, Some of us guys are not taking it to be able to perform 2 or 3 times back to back, we are taking them as they were intended, to be able to support an erection and to reach round one successfully.
She is not too bright, is she?
No, she won't know for sure unless the guy told her he took something.
And why not want a guy to be hard and erect? Would she rather suck on his limp noodle or have to constantly stimulate him? Or as soon as the condom goes on, he goes limp? Id choose a hard one over a limp one any day. It's a much easier session.
The lady who said she didn't want to see men who took the ED drugs were the young pups taking it as a recreational drug. I think she mentioned she didn't mind it being used for it's intended purpose.
...a guy that doesn't need the ED med takes it. Providers posting here and those I've had private conversations with say when a guy that doesn't need ED medication takes it to be sure he can last long and go hard the entire time it can make his erection so hard as to be inflexible and actually hurts her during intercourse. (Seems this would be uncomfortable for him too.) This on top of all the other discomforts from being the "Energizer" bunny and just keep going and going and going.
I use Viagra. It works. I have a normal erection. It comes and goes based on whatever activity I'm engaged in at the moment and when the lady and I are ready for intercourse I have no problem with penetration.
I know many already know what I'm about to say but I also know some don't. The 4 hour erection is when something is wrong. That's why they say go to the doctor if it happens. I actually had a provider tell me that she thought that's what it did. Give you a 4 hour erection. (Yes, she was young. But I'm not sure that's why she thought that. I think she was simply uninformed.)
I would hope no provider had a problem with a client that needed ED medication using it. I have to think the ones that are asking about it have had a bad experience with a client that used it when he didn't need it.
...and yes, this has been discussed many times. But you never know when someone that didn't read those discussions will read this one and learn something.
What I said was "I prefer not to deal with men who have not yet mastered how to take these meds," i.e. guys who take too much, or too soon before an appt. and cannot get off. Of course I prefer an erection over a limp noodle...made that same comment word for word as well, but what I don't prefer is something that is like a brick! No, I am not a mind reader so assuming I was suggesting I would somehow know a guy was on this without him telling me is retarded, but that's what references are for.
I do mostly multi-hour dates so yea the guy will normally have to mention this because he has to know when to take the stuff. If we play first he takes it an hour before, but if we are meeting for drinks for a couple hours he has to wait. Most men who take ED meds have to plan around that stuff, so it's not exactly hard to figure out who is on it and who is not. I had many horrible experiences with men in their 30s taking this, and it's not something I want to deal with. I simply will not see them "again."
I am not talking about guys who take these drugs for the purpose of achieving an erection...that's fkin retarded to even suggest one would prefer to deal with up, down, up, down, vs. just up. My issue is with men who cannot cum and then want to write a bad review when we dare suggest their time is up and it's not my damn fault you have issues. I did not sign up to be a machine for 400 bucks I will tell you that. The one guy I really regret seeing was on this stuff and I flat out told him his rate would never be the regular rate again for what I had to deal with. He was rock hard, really big, and it was almost a hospital visit when we were done..he still did NOT cum!
As for "setting myself up" for anything I can't verify, I can flat out stop when I want to at any time thanks. If I discover I am being lied to or manipulated, that is also just cause for an alert. Lying to see a provider is never acceptable, so think about that. That's like a provider with a no black guys policy being told the guy was white to get in the door. Another example would be lying about your age when a woman has a 35 and up rule. She has every right to do what she wants after the fact includng taking the money, and telling him to piss off!
-- Modified on 4/9/2012 9:18:31 AM
Thank you for continuing the discussion for those of us who didn't see the previous information, or even know where to look. If this is old news, I guess you can just move on to the next thing??
The provider that I referred to did post an additional explanation which goes along with what has been posted here. She stated that the guy she had a problem was going on and on way past his time and then was upset he couldn't complete and refused to pay for additional time even though he overstayed by an hour. She felt that the stuff caused an unnatural ability to last for a long time but the guy would never get off and the experience was not enjoyable. She seemed to understand that some guys may be using it as intended.
...various topics being discussed on this board.
When we had moderators, they would pull the post and direct you to the existing one!
to be able to do nothing but play on TER and at the beach all year round lol.
Sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil are not virility drugs and do not increase potency. They simply assist increased blood flow to the penis allowing you to achieve and sustain an erection.
What's harder?
Trying to become aroused by and having intercourse with a man who can't maintain an erection?
Or becoming aroused by and having intercourse with a guy who has a hard-on?
I have more fun with the 2nd guy and time flies when you're having fun.
So Viagra makes our job more enjoyable (and easier).
E/D meds means more guys who can maintain erections equals more business for the gals who see them. B4 I started taking only stuck with ATF, now I can really enjoy myself with multiple providers. Everybody wins!
-- Modified on 4/8/2012 4:07:39 PM