I think the “grading” system could be revised a little. I have had a problem giving gals a 10 when they deserved a 9.6 or something like that. Can the curve be expanded to 100 type points instead of ten?

insurmountable, and really the level of detail not really worth it.

You can, however, express your numerical opinion in the body of your review.

You do understand that computers were initially designed to compute, do you? Not to display pictures and videos.  

Possibly by "insurmountable," mrfisher meant difficult, ridiculous, and meaningless?

Reviews manipulation would still exist, and there would still be guys with no standards, but even allowing "half points" would be an improvement over the ten point system we have now.

and lets' be honest, we don't really have a ten point system, anything below a six is just downright ugly. We have more like a four point system. 7-8-9 and 10. giving a bit more latitude to the reviewers would be a good thing IMO

That made absolutely no sense to me whatsover. You need to articulate better.

Have you reviewed the ratings policies?   If you're saying 9.6, you're making up your own rating system.  Or you can't resolve a 60/40 split choice between two levels.

Sorry, I didn't mean to offend. Yes I have read the criteria for reviews but I think it could be better. Some gals expect a 10 but they normally aren't "1 in a million", but some are very close, thus the fractions make sense to me.  

Well...  They do get averaged, so there's the moderating factor.

If I give my 10 out early on, because this girl was more than the 9 experiences.  Then I meet another girl a year later who I feel is now my new 10.  What happens to the former 10?  She was better than all the sessions that were a 9.  Do all the former 9's become downgraded to 8's, and so on down the line.  Seems like a lot of book keeping.  Having been able to give out 9.9's instead would have been better, than multiple 10's.  Leaving the 10 as an ideal that I may never hand out, but used instead to measure against.

Looks and Performance are not really useful... That seems the real issue...  

Somehow I think that makes sense in a way. I think that a more effective way of reviewing and grading helps both sides. She knows what you want and you know what you want. Interesting.

But the devil is in the details and it is all about the survey questions...

We aren't cattle and we're providing very intimate and personal services.  

Re cattle: That goes to whether any reviews are appropriate not the fairness of either this or that regime. I agree that reviewing is rough and I would go broke if I were an escort but the question is how to make the review system better for the customer.  

saw one girl the other day that I thought might be a 9.31415926, but after careful consideration I decided she merited only a 9.31415925

You've bought cattle at auction or you have not?   I have.  There are a few things you judge them on, PERIOD.  Each thing has a fairly specific effect on their value.  Regardless of their cuteness.  

It would be utterly "fair."