Write Review
2,069,713 Total Reviews 3,803 New Reviews
20,348 Users Online

Suggestion and Policy

So You Know Sofia....regular_smile
terrev 89 Reviews 9714 reads
posted

See My Review of Sofia Here: http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=555284&user=629730

and her ad site below...unbelieveably HOT!  The camera fails miserably to capture her.

Related Link: Sofia Columbian - As Short, Hot, And Sweet As They Cum

holeydiver10026 reads

I notice some long reviews get cut off.  What is the allowable character count of "general details" and the allowable character count in VIP "juicy detals"????

ReplyQuoteReport
Sardonic Scythe7951 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
TashaVegas9712 reads

Because I had a gentleman write one that was the max length.  He means well but it is terribly long.  I have included a link below.

Tasha

Related Link: Big Review with Tons of Details

ReplyQuoteReport
holeydiver9882 reads

I wonder if the "general section has a 6000 max too?

ReplyQuoteReport
TashaVegas11086 reads

Sorry forgot he removed two paragraphs to make it fit correctly lol, might have to have him try the General part when I see him in May LOL.

ReplyQuoteReport
rbhobbydude9654 reads

Too many details kinda ruin the experience for me...I like to keep some things to myself....special memories.

ReplyQuoteReport
terrev9715 reads

See My Review of Sofia Here: http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=555284&user=629730

and her ad site below...unbelieveably HOT!  The camera fails miserably to capture her.

Related Link: Sofia Columbian - As Short, Hot, And Sweet As They Cum

ReplyQuoteReport
rbhobbydude10606 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
MikeRH11156 reads

Pretty sure the limit for the General part is 2000 characters.

I write the reviews in Word before I copy & paste into the form, & in Word I'm always under the limit, but for some reason when I copy/paste it ends up going over the limit, & I need to edit.

ReplyQuoteReport
bakdorman12011 reads

Dayum that review belongs in the Calendar section of the LA Times. I'm surprised it didn't get rejected for lack of graphic details. So which guy was it Siskel or Ebert, must have been Ebert isn't Siskel dead?

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!