I think I agree. And I wish I better understood how the Location and Search functions worked.
.
I think that there is a limit to how many Locations (cities) can be displayed in a Profile. Too lazy to search right now, but I think it is 2 or 3. So (Main) City: NY might also have Other City Served: Philly and Baltimore ... but not enough room for Boston, DC, Hartford and Atlanta.
.
However, sometimes when I would Search for, say, Boston, I would get Profiles where I couldn't find any mention of Boston on the displayed page. "Boston" must have been in the metadata someplace ... I think. TER: How does that work?
.
Then, there's "Session Location" within Reviews. Some people take that to mean City ("Boston, MA") but some people take to mean something more specific: "Her Hotel" "My home" "Hotel Room" ...
.
Some of those other location (City; meeting location) database fields could use some fixing up, too. NOTE: Location should NOT be GPS coordinates!
.
So I think agree about the "Touring" option unless there's a better way to get more info about more cities onto the page (if you think that would also help or work).
Posted By: Debra_Hollander
As far as I know, there is currently no way to specify "Touring", "Other" or "None" as the primary City Location on a companion's profile.
One must enter a City name both there and under "Other City Serviced", as well.
For those ladies who tour a LOT and don't have a true "home base", it'd be good for everyone to have a way to indicate that.
On my own profile, I've listed two of the cities I visit most frequently, but this leads to people in those cities contacting me because they think I am there on that day when the odds are, I'm not.
If I could simply have "Touring" listed, it could save everyone a bit of wasted time and disappointment.
Also, some people who enjoy seeing touring ladies could then reach out to request a visit to his city.
I'm sure there's a downside but honestly, I don't see it.
Thanks in advance!