her ratings are based on all her reviews..if you start setting parameters it will more than likely skew the entire rating..if her first 2 years showed stellar reviews and the last year poor ones..it will negatively reflect her overall rating..the opposite is also true..her rating should reflect her entire body of work..not bits and pieces of it..

I have to travel to get most reviews so this would not be fair by any means depending on location.  
Just because my reviews have a lot of time gaps in them is not my fault and I am still very much active.

Currently your appearance based upon all of your reviews is 7.58
Your performance is 8.71
Giving you an average of 8.15  - Which puts you squarely at #71 for Atlanta

If they justed used the last year, your appearance score is 8.07 and your performance is 9.07
Which gives you an average of 8.58 and would move you from 71 to 31 or 32

That would be a neat trick indeed!!

Currently your appearance based upon all of your reviews is 8.47
Your performance is 8.39
Giving you an average of 8.43  - Which puts you squarely at #27 for San Diego

If they just used the last year, your appearance score is 9.33 and your performance is 9.67!!
Which gives you an average of 9.5 and would move you from 27 to #3 locally and on the national board at #36!!

That would be a cool trick as well!!

Kerri, currently your appearance based upon all of your reviews is 7.26
Your performance is 8.56
Giving you an average of 7.91  - Which puts you just on the top 100 list at #96 for Atlanta.

If they just used the last year,
your appearance score is 8.31
and your performance is 9.25
Which raises your average to 8.78 and you would rise like creme into the top 25 at #19.