In my own searches (used in preparing THE MATHESAR REPORT) I always change the default so as to included profiles with bad websites -- except that sometimes I forget and have to redo the search.
Two days ago I posted a simple question on the LA board about a provider I was planning to see in less than two weeks. I asked what happened to the bodybuilder April in Burbank.
Her reviews are gone and I can't even get a straight answer or even ask the question.
You can email me privately if you want.
Thanks for a very helpful site.
M
She is on the bad website list.
http://theeroticreview.com/link/link.asp?ID=2423
-- Staff
So why didn't you allow his question on the LA board, and your answer there would have been helpful to others?
A common problem is that people don't realize that "Exclude bad websites" is the default. Personally, I favor changing the default, and let people change it if they want.
In my own searches (used in preparing THE MATHESAR REPORT) I always change the default so as to included profiles with bad websites -- except that sometimes I forget and have to redo the search.
Just look one thread up to see another example of this confusing situation.
Personally, I like it that bad websites are excluded. You could make it a user definable feature though, so that each person could set a default they prefer.
...I too prefer that bad websites are automatically excluded.
Eventually, many of the defaults on the site will be stored in your profile. It is just a matter of resources to write the software.
-- Staff