Write Review
2,074,974 Total Reviews 3,685 New Reviews
9,361 Users Online

San Francisco

Re:The question isn't why did he continue
bruzberg 12145 reads
posted

I think that a hooker with fake pics should be banned. Course that is just my opinion. Paying for the session is one way of avoiding a confrontation. I don't think there is much else you can do except share the information with others. In this particular case the stories about her swallowing and how beautiful have been around so long one would think she had the same review writer as Brazil or some of the other providers that never have a bad session. I wouldn't pay that much cash for someone like her. The pictures may not show the acne but you can clearly see she doesn't have much ass or breasts.

dented1200111823 reads

Guys that go around not being direct about how much acne a hooker has on her face or how little ass she has should remember that what comes around goes around. One day they will be mislead by fake pictures and lies about beauty. I'm pissed. Out $400 for a flat chested, flat ass provider that got upset because I asked to come in her mouth.

Related Link: http://lovings.com/X_Britney/index.htm

ReplyQuoteReport
MysteryAdmin14967 reads

That's part of the reason I tend to take reviews with a grain of salt, since you really don't know how accurate the reviews are (no way to verify integrity of the reviewer) and I've found a lot of guys tend to embellish a lot.

Sorry you had a bad experience.  I haven't seen her and know nothing about her except she's got great ad pics.

Peace...

ReplyQuoteReport
MysteryAdmin12220 reads

Oh yeah, why did you continue with the session if you were not satisfied with her looks when you got together with her?

Peace...

ReplyQuoteReport
dante79010705 reads

Given we had driven for a while might try to make the best of things. Another reason to continue I've found myself dealing with more than once, having read the posters review, some of the problems weren't known until after the cash had changed hands. Some whores will not refund your cash just because you got taken in by pics that were photoshopped. Guess I would have not written a review been uncharacteristicly rough to get my moneys worth. You can look at her pics and she the girl ain't that fine. I wouldn't pay that kind of cash for a whore with no body no matter how blonde she is. If a guy wants nice blonde pussy then Holly is the way to go and she offers many different service levels. I've actually seen her advertising $250 for an hour. There is simply no comparison between Holly's D cups and booming cheerleader body to the Britney whore and her reviews by Britney and photos by the Wizard of make believe.

ReplyQuoteReport
MysteryAdmin10403 reads

I understand your points, especially after traveling long distances to only _THEN_ find out you've been "duped".   Services not being provided as "anticipated", if not clearly "advertised", is one thing.  Physical appearance is another.

If I were to see a provider who looked nothing like the pics in the ad and that was a problem for me, I would "excuse myself" and not go through with the session, especially if we're talking about this level of rate.  If she insisted on some type of compensation for opening the door and letting me see she does not look like the person in the ad pic(s), then I would give her something ($50 - $100).

Lastly, I was also surprised she charged the original poster the rate she did.  :)

Peace...

ReplyQuoteReport
Sedagive11970 reads

Sorry, if I went to see a provider who used fake photos or looked nothing like the photos, I wouldn't give her a penny for any type of compensation.  I'm not going to reward her for misleading and/or lying to me.  Sedagive.

ReplyQuoteReport
MysteryAdmin9392 reads

I wholeheartedly agree with this and the only reason I brought up "compensation" wasn't to "reward" her but to keep the situation from becoming indiscreet or escalating to undesirable ladies.  For all you know, there could be someone "waiting in the wings" to provide her with "assistance" for getting _something_ for her time.

This has NOT happened to me, fortunately, but I've read feedback from others where they just tried to leave and things got very ugly.

Peace...

ReplyQuoteReport
janusmgr13046 reads

The more appropriate question is should guys that purposely deceive other hobbyist be allowed to continue?

It's a fact that Britney uses fake pictures. Ask her if you don't know. Brintey will tell you she has had more acne problems than most.

Ask her about the private messages about greek. If she lies I can post her response to the question. I kept her answer. Britney intentionally mislead me about offering greek.

ReplyQuoteReport
MysteryAdmin9732 reads

I've read a number of reviews where the guy didn't _lie_ maliciously but deceived through embellishment.   One of the things I've found through the review systems is there's really no way to "verify" the review or the reviewer.  With sessions varying with provider/client combination, it's difficult sometimes to know where the reality starts/stops and the fantasy starts/stops.

For example, I've read reviews of a provider I know very well that indicated that she "swallowed" during that session.  I know for a fact that she doesn't (or at least hasn't for YEARS and I'm talking fairly recent reviews right now).  Did the reviewer intend to deceive through the review?  Did the reviewer _think_ she swallowed when she really didn't?  (Given how she deals with that, I don't see how he could think otherwise, but that's another discussion... :))  Did the reviewer embellish some to make the review "sound" better?  How feasible is it to "control" this kind of content?

Like I posted in my other reply, providers deceiving about servies is much harder to deal with.

Now, in this particular case, if it's a "well known" fact (a fact that I didn't know until today) that this provider uses fake pictures, then I would have to ask how the original poster could have missed this piece of info.  If it's NOT a "well known" fact, but still a fact, then we (as a community) need to find a way to make info like this much more readily accessible if we're trying to use sites, like this one, to "help" each other out.  :)

Peace...

ReplyQuoteReport
bruzberg12146 reads

I think that a hooker with fake pics should be banned. Course that is just my opinion. Paying for the session is one way of avoiding a confrontation. I don't think there is much else you can do except share the information with others. In this particular case the stories about her swallowing and how beautiful have been around so long one would think she had the same review writer as Brazil or some of the other providers that never have a bad session. I wouldn't pay that much cash for someone like her. The pictures may not show the acne but you can clearly see she doesn't have much ass or breasts.

ReplyQuoteReport
vanessorop8334 reads

Not only is Britney using fake pictures she is trying to use two different sets of reviews to confuse us. Comopolo's review of her isn't with my review. This provider is making up the rules as she goes to mislead us and take our dough.

ReplyQuoteReport
albcourt10236 reads

Don't blame guys. Its probably the whore herself. She's the one with the zits. She couldn't have her pictures doctored without her knowlege.

Just vote with your feet. Make em turn around before you give up the cash. Look closely. Don't be so polite. You need to remember its your money. Whores like Britney only run games when guys like you don't pay attention. She sucked you out of $$ or $300 more than a skinny whore of her level would normally get because you weren't paying attention. Didn't ask her over the phone if her pictures were representative or accurate did you? Don't blame us because you didn't handle yourself properly.

You should have known $$$$ was too much cash for Britney based on her pictures doctored or not. Unless you like flat chested hookers.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!