What do you consider a low review (7..6...5)

Would you see a provider with a score you considered low?

Providers.... do you consider the nature of the reviewer before sessioning with him?

Ive read about a lot of providers who strongly discouraged being reviewed even if its a good one.

A low review is just as you say, (7..6...5). Let's throw an 8 in there as well. In this hobby, there is no medium. You are either wonderful, and I'll return, or you're not. Therefore, I only see ladies with 9s and 10s. And I'm talking strictly about the service rating. That doesn't guarantee anything. It simply increases my odds. In recent times, due to an unforeseen turn of events, escort pricing has skyrocketed to astronomical proportions. In the old days, a gentleman could afford to take a chance on a 7 or an 8, in hopes of an unexpected connection. Not anymore. If I'm going to pay astronomical rates, I think it's fair to demand astronomical ratings.  

That's where it becomes difficult for the lady. I can filter the ladies I see for the most part. But as an escort, many times you're going to end up seeing a creep or two. Someone, for example, who wants bbfs, or he'll give you a low rating. Then I come along wanting my 9s and 10s, not knowing you had to deal with a creep. I'll pass you by. It's a Catch-11.

Ok. Thank you for your response
I know that we all have measures we take to protect our chances of having the best experienxe possible.
Im just wondering whether you guys are reading the full review, not just the number. One guys 7 may be anothers 9? I love my reviews even thiugh my service was rated 7 because of what the guys actually wrote. I never considered gentleman may be looking at my 7 ratings for service and passing me by based on that.

I figured since my reviewers continue to see me and a few saw me twice in the same night, that would matter more than the number 7.

I am taking your words as constructive criticism, which I value.

I amv ery in tune to my gentlemen friends and I am dedicated to finding what I can get totally into about them, about us and the moment and building off of that up to a beautifal climax.
I have been a provider for a year now and look forward to growing in every area possible.

For this reason, your feedback is appreciated.

I never take the 7 personal because my returning friends and undeniabley amazing experiences with old and new friends, is what im actually in it for :-*

 
Xoxo

-- Modified on 4/28/2015 10:27:16 PM

If we are talking about the number rating system of TER. The Review Board has specifically pointed out to follow the Guidelines For Submitting Reviews, par 2, which mentions the objectivity of the reviewer, quotes "be fair and honest" and par 7, which is the heart of the entire reviews, which specify the Numbers Points System, matching the what kinds of performance occurred. Escorts can only earned up to 7pts, unless additional performance was added earns 1pt each and max out to 10pts.

And to answer your questions anything LOWER than 7pts is a LOW SCORE, because on this note, all the reviews that are submitted for approval to the Review Board the NUMBERS earned has to match and be described in details in the Juicy Details Narratives with an acronyms performed or spelled out, and if the Review Board finds out that is not consistent within the guidelines they'll send you a FEEDBACK a suggestion to edit and resubmit for another request for approval. It's a little tough to follow all the guidelines but after you've done it a few times it's gets easier..

On my own personal note 7 and above is quite acceptable, looks great to me, because in reality most of us in the industry been doing it for a while, sometimes you can encounter an amazing and absolutely stunning lady but practices safe sex with no exemptions and still delivers but due to the strict guidelines the Review Board will NOT allow her to earn the maximum point just for that reason for me it's fair and I still considered it great but anything lower, I tend to pause and verify both the reviewer's and the lady reviewed any consistency of their records, before I will proceed and make my judgement, which one is more believable between the two..Hope this will help, good luck...

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/submitReview.asp

-- Modified on 4/28/2015 11:32:55 PM

-- Modified on 4/28/2015 11:51:23 PM

 
Ah. That totally helps. Makes so much technical sense when explained that way.
Thank you for responding. Love your smarty pants brain!
Ill get familiar with that structure, excellent imput!

:-

This board is very GFE centric. Most of us look for high marks in terms of service. Looks are subjective. There is no way to compare "massage" services to escort services. You would have to compare massage ladies to other massage ladies and GFE ladies to other GFE ladies. It's not practical to do that. Personally I agree with giving GFE ladies the highest scores.

I've found experiences with friends who have 9s and 10s for service to be consistently wonderful. And considering the size of the investment I'm making I think it's fair to ask for wonderful.  

But that doesn't mean scores less than 9 are necessarily 'low.' They can also be irrelevant.  Let me explain how I read TER

- If someone has a bunch of recent good reviews (say mostly 9s over the last year) and a bunch of older less good reviews, I'll figure they improved/found their niche and totally ignore the older reviews
- If a review is way out of line (someone has a 9, 9, 10, 9, 5 for example) I'd look carefully at the 5 and probably figure something was going on and ignore it
- I always click on the reviewers and see how they score ("wow...he mostly gives 6s and he gave her 8!") and just think "OK, that probably should have been a 9-10."
- If I'm at all interested, I will read the reviews. And if the score is lower than the review text suggests (seems to have a fantastic session but gives her say a 7) I'll just ignore the low score and again figure "OK - that probably should have been a 9."
- I know you aren't supposed to give FBSM higher than a 7, so if I see a 7 on someone who only lists FBSM I'll just ignore it, or figure it's between a 9 and 10 for an escort.

FWIW..

The looser someone's boundaries are the higher their review scores will be. The review system here is based on boundaries not quality of service. Those are not the same thing. Let's say I enjoyed doing something that rhymes with meek with someone I had good chemistry with. I certainly do not want to that with every single person I spend time with. For one it could be painful if not done correctly. So I guess that means my service is lackluster according to this website. That's an interesting perspective. Anyways this is all hypothetical - I am paid for my time of course.!

Well put, logical and realistic assessment of the technicalities of a number scale-review system.  
From a providers perspective, you hit the nail head on, I do believe.

Xxooxxoo

Not true, maybe you just have read the first paragraph from the Guidelines for Submitting Reviews par 7, if you continue and read the second paragraph, it explains how the Review Boards determined the points system.

That is the reason why the the TEXT NARRATIVES is so important when you submit your reviews. You MUST SPECIFY in details and explain everything that was PERFORMED and ALL THAT WAS OFFERED in order to earned the points. So IMHO, TER is consistently fair. It all comes down to the reviewer's TEXT in the Juicy Detail to point out to the Review Board what was performed and what was offered and embed it with the reviews. Otherwise it's just plain cut & dry point system. And TER has really has been objective and very considerate that "your opinion really matter". when it come to submitting reviews. I cut and paste par 7 below...

7. In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she is willing to perform one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, and Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. For each of these services that are offered, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum.

This does not mean she earns extra points for offering the service(s); just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is performed during your session with her. You may or may not be interested in the “extra” services she offers, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score.
  -- Modified on 4/29/2015 5:42:51 PM

-- Modified on 4/29/2015 6:03:38 PM

I think she is referring more to the mindset of a reviewer when deciding on whether to see a 7 or less (ter score) considering the rating system which to some extent does reflect boundaries (bbj etc)  

I know she directly refers to this sites review system, but in direct correlation to the mindset of the reviewer when deciding on choosing a sexy lil' harlot

 

-- Modified on 4/29/2015 6:22:56 PM

The mindset of most men is trying to find an experience that includes GFE services. IOW, if I show up clean, well groomed and act polite what type of services do I have a reasonable expectation of getting?  

I fully agree with TER's review system. It rewards ladies who give GFE services. If some guy wanted restricted services he could look at the lower (service) rated ladies.

An attempt to define real GFE services is in this thread.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewall.asp?MessageID=771355&boardID=12&page=3#771355
   
   
 

-- Modified on 4/30/2015 3:27:31 AM

That's precisely why I hesitate starting the review writing process here on ter. They want to dictate how to write, including what the numbers mean. When I write a review, it's from the heart. And my service rating has nothing to do with specific acts that were performed. An escort doesn't have to cimws, rim, or that thing rhymed with meek. My service rating has to do with nuance, subtleties, honesty, and allure. I have a friend who does not wish to bbbj. It's strictly cbj, and always has been over the years. Yet, she is a ten over ten. More like a twelve over twelve for all her nuance. I could write a book on how to be an escort, and base it solely on her. Because she's cbj, ter would not allow a ten. On the other hand, I've had ladies do all of the above and more, yet they weren't close to being a ten. It was performance without nuance.

If that is how you feel then there is no need for your reviews. A CBJ experience is not a 10 experience no matter how you sugarcoat it. Sorry , but it's not about finding "love" or some deeply emotional experience. TER is about finding high quality no strings attached hot sex. An escort may fill some emotional need but that is secondary to GFE type sex.

This has been very insightful.

Thanks for all who responded!

Have a beautiful Thursday,  nerd out :-p

Xxoo

I'll try to give this subject one more shot and move on after. Let me start. GFE is an acronym that gives a certain meaning to everyone, but bottom line is, no matter what, it's up to the CLIENTS to accept or refuse and consent and determine whether he wants the encounter to be safe or not. That's why I can hardly emphasize the importance of the review text to described in details what was performed and was offered and WHICH SIDES between the party decided whether the session will be safe or? to give the Review Board indication and asses and determine the score. What I'm trying to convey here is.

For example, If the lady is GFE she probably automatically gets a high score because she's willing to perform everything within the guideline, but if the CLIENTS decided that he wants a safe sessions and convey that in the text, I strongly believed the Review Boards still rewards her a GFE high scores because she offered, but the clients declined.  

Like, on the other hand when lady set her boundaries, and was mentioned on the text their is a potential that she limits herself certain score and not be rewarded the max, but if the boundaries was not mentioned in the text at all, the Review Board still rewards her the maximum scores, because they factor in "your opinion matters" depends on how you articulate your reviews and convey as clients that the  overall experience from the sessions was deserving a maximum points.  

P.S. I believed in this because I have a few exchanges and feedbacks on some of my reviews from the board and got educated...

I'm not here to find 'love'. I'm not here for a deeply emotional experience. Nor am I here to attach any strings. I'm here to find a one hour highly charged sexual experience. But that experience has to come with nuance. It can't be rote. It can't be routine. It can't be run of the mill. It can't be faked. It has to be honest. The best part is when you find a highly charged lady who exudes nuance. Trust me, they're out there.  

But you're right. The first time I saw her, I wasn't happy with the CBJ. That was it. I wasn't going to return. But as I was driving home, I kept thinking about all these little things that happened during the session that had nothing to do with sex, and everything to do with sex. I knew I had to go back to see what it was all about. The second time the session changed, and she became even more intriguing. I've been seeing her ever since for one hour sessions. I'm not in love with her. I don't want to marry her. I don't want her to have my babies. I just want to have sex with her until it's time for one of us to move on. I've had many many sessions with her. Too numerous to count. The part that I can't fathom is that in each and every one of those sessions things were different. Every sexual experience with her is new. She's uncanny. She's the only one who has ever done that. I wish I could give you the details. But as you stated, there is no need for me to give you the details because you're hung up on definition, not nuance.  

But let me say one more thing about her. Last year, just for fun, I decided to make a top ten list of my greatest escort experiences ever. Since I only see highly rated ladies, I had hundreds of wonderful experiences from which to choose. Well, she made the top ten list four separate times, including the number one spot. And you're telling me that the single greatest sexual experience of my life doesn't deserve a ten. I'm sorry but I think I have to politely disagree