Another new one just appeared. Same old story. This review is not quite as juicy as the first one but as usual the reviewer has NO posting history. We're right back where we started. Nowhere. Is she or isn't she a ripoff? I have an opinion but its not entirely objective. Still waiting for a verifyable review.

Notice this second review is more "standard"... no incredible experience as the first review would suggest.  In fact, looking at the girl's pics would suggest that she is a bit flabby, not the mega babe portayed the first time, complete with stretch marks.

Called and girl answered, I could hear kids in the background.  She offered to meet out or in at La Mesa for $$$.  Sounded very good on phone, offered what I liked, but I was careful and decided not to go. Will wait for more favorable objective reviews.  Sorry guys, not willing to take one for the team with this one.

Maybe she should Miriah Mylion............aire!

Amazing that this girl has absolutely no response to this line of discussion. Why doesn't she defend herself? Makes it even more questionable to me. Apparantly it doesn't bother her. I suppose she is just content to sit back with the Brigittes and Austins of the world and prey on the uninformed and unsuspecting.

Perhaps "moonlight" (see Milyion thread below) is her in disguise.  Obviously there is no defense for a rapidly changing landscapte.

Although I know nothing one way or the other about her legitimacy (or lack thereof): I seriously doubt that many “newbie” providers would have the nerve to step up to the proverbial plate in order to go for a few rounds with a group of gentlemen such as yourselves...even in self-defense. (Not to mention the fact that new providers are often advised by both other providers as well as those few influential first clients that it is best not to post every time you need to defend yourself...as it is worse for business to show an argumentative, defensive demeanor to all of those who read the board than to let unanswered allegations remain.) (Hell--I still receive concerned emails every time I have a disagreement on these boards--warning me that, regardless of circumstance-- quarrelsome, challenging or aggressive behaviors are a certain turn-off for potential new clients.)

Or, is it possible that she does not know about this board, yet? Although I was aware of the `other board,’ I didn’t discover TER until a few months later. Though even when providers do know of the boards--many don’t read them regularly...and those that do are often just interested in perusing the review section. Generally speaking, for most providers--answering phones/emails, seeing clients, and then taking care of personal necessities are the daily priorities--checking message boards for any posts that might be of interest does not usually make it on the daily `to do‘ list.

Besides--if she’s not responding (for whatever reason) to your allegations, and no one has gone to see her--why insist on analyzing, speculating, and surmising things about her when no one really has enough information to make a conclusion? If you’ve already decided you aren’t willing to “take one for the team,” why even think about her until someone trusted has seen her? There are plenty of other providers to choose from whose legitimacy has been established...so why insist on focusing on one about whom you have doubts?

In all fairness, questions about the legitimacy of this provider surfaced back in mid-June.  Until that thread developed, her "review" stood as being legitimate.  The all of a sudden the staff deletes it as being bogus, and two new reviews pop up.  The poster on this board asking why her initial review was deleted has never posted before and has no reviews.  Ergo, lots of reasons to be skeptical.  Seems like one of the purposes of this board is to augment the reviews and to protect members from wasting their time and money.  In this case, the process seems to be working.  Of course, it is unlikely that a new provider would venture on this board to defend herself even if she knows about it, for the reasons stated by Perspicacity.

Ya know, not everyone has a computer!  (I think) I've met her in passing (I bumped into a gal who looks like her in the lobby of an incall place not too long ago), and if it was the same person I'd be surprised if she had access to a computer.  Not very 'high-end', if ya know what I mean.  Don't read what I just said as a review...I'm not even sure it was her.  I'm just saying, a lack of self defense here can't be taken as an admission of guilt.

Ashley, fairness actually had very little to do with what I posted. It was done to get a reaction from her. She is being bashed by myself and others for being a possible scam. I provided an opportunity for an opposing point of view and merely wanted to put the matter to rest. Frankly, I'm a little tired of the discussion. The truth is slowly coming out and we find that it is nothing close to the original sparkling review. I see no reason now to continue this thread. I have come to my own conclusion.
Of course your opinion is respected and very welcome Ashley and I appreciate your objectivity

True, a lack of defense is not a guilty verdict. As I posted earlier I merely provided the opportunity for her to defend what was being said. Until someone posted a verifiable review all we had was a review that we hoped would be true but knew probably wasn't.
As for the "not everyone has a computer" theory. Maybe that one works. She might not be the sharpest pencil in the box but she did have the means to list in SD Exotics and probably knows about this site. Where did that first bogus review come from? Chances are that if she doesn't have a computer she does have access to one.
I grow a little bored with discussing her anyhow. If she can contribute something and defend herself, fine. If not, who cares. I'm fairly satisfied with the review that's in place right now and I've moved on to other matters.

But, recently, on the `other board'--2 individuals who do have a posting history have posted mini-reviews of Miriah on the SD public board. They aren't detailed accounts--but they seem to assert that she is a legit provider--not a rip-off. I'll drop the issue, no problem--I just happened to see the info and thought you may wish to venture over to view it...

(By the way, I am not "Ashley"--that name belongs to a well-known SD rip-off with whom I wish not to be associated. Don't mean to be a nitpicker--just don't want to risk the confusion.)