I have recently recieved a false review from a poor gentleman by the name of Papi. In his review, he states that he calls, 858-373-0255. This number does not belong to me. When I called this number, she stated it was an agency by the name of Foxes. Please be aware that they have/are falsely sending girls out as me. I do not work for an agency nor have I seen this "PAPI", I am very independent, so be aware of this agency. It is not me!!!If you want to contact me, my number is listed on my website...
www.xoticpleasures.net

Where is the false review listed? It's not here, or it's listed under another name?

Dear Vanessa,
 I have checked out your "false reviews" and I can not find the one under the (619) area code you say is false.  If it is ther, and it is false,... that certainly isn't good. (a false review certainly isn't good for me).  I did feel compelled to write because you are a total hotty, and just the flavor I love, but the existing reviews for you on the site,... well...

 I will re-affirm my loyalty to this site.  and say a prayer for the folks at TJ's in the Valley, at Kings(RIP) in Costa Mesa, and the fullerton place that closed too,....

 Vanessa,... you are really the type of gal i'd love to make happy.... but your review doesn't say the same for me.  Mail me if you wish.... i'd love to hear from you. (no flames please)
xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxo anon

Under the “new reviews” section, there is one of Vanessa. When this review first appeared, I remember that the reviewer, "PAPI" did reference the website “xoticpleasures.net”  However, this web address has now been removed, and now has the “report new website” tag. It’s still there--just sans the reference to her website.

Interestingly enough, the same reviewer posted a review of “Lisa” this month as well--which is a very similar account to the “Vanessa” review (with the ladies‘ details changed, of course,)  where the lady showed up--but the session never took place due to false advertisement and the girl “did not meet Papi’s standards.” Poor Papi--June has been such an unfulfilling month...but, on the bright side: at least he received another free month of membership with those two reviews!

Ashlee, I just checked and Vanessa has only two total reviews, is it one of those? They weren't negative sounding.When I looked for Lisa I see Papi's review of Vanessa, otherwise no.

He is quite a character, apparently changes the race of the provider to what he thinks they look like to him, not what they state, then downgrades them on misrepresentation??

          CD

-- Modified on 6/26/2001 8:38:52 PM

Vanessa,
I feel the same way as(anon). I believe your totally a hottie, but your reviews or should I say review state otherwise! However,I will have to, like any other level-headed fellow, wait for more positive feedback on your service. Which is 'HARD' to do since your really the type of women I like.
I hope things work out for you and you are no longer falsely accused as a 'ripoff'! Good-luck!
pepper69

Seems like PAPI's review has some inconsistencies.  On the one hand, it references Vanessa Pleasures's phone number, and the experience seems comparably low in mileage to V.P.'s two "official" reviews.  On the other hand, PAPI describes the provider's p*$$y as natural whereas VP's gallery depicts nary a hair down there.

So who knows what is really going on with PAPI.  He never posts on this board, so he may not even be aware of V.P.'s beef and be in a position to set the record straight.

In any event, how would V.P. know or not whether a client she has seen is indeed PAPI or anyone else?  Who's to say that a client would use the same handle or name that they post with?

SD-Exotics had more than one Vanessas' listed.
Looks just got the website mixed up with who was who.

http://www.sd-exotics.com/ads/esbr/esvan822br.htm

http://www.sd-exotics.com/ads/esbr/esvan704br.htm

What??? All three of Vanessa Pleasure’s reviews rate her quite high in the aesthetics category (try looking under “Vanessa Pleasures” instead of “Vanessa.”) The “Vanessa” review was submitted as a review of a “new provider”--not listed with her other reviews.)

I must say though--although I do not personally know Ms. Pleasures; but, as a provider, I know it must be quite frustrating to take the initiative to report a false review, that is obviously not in accordance with previous accounts. Then, in response to this outing of a bogus review, and statement that the reviewer had never even entertained her company,  the response from potential clients is to the effect of, `Gee...you look hot; but, you only have one review--and it doesn’t say that you’re as hot as your likeness appears. So, after your one review--I really need to see some positive info posted about you before I’d consider seeing you.'

Am I missing something? Isn’t the whole point of Vanessa’s post the fact that this new review is FAKE?