Just read a review wherein hobbyist slams provider, but admits he didn't submit review until AFTER she turned him down for a SECOND date. Who asks a lady for a second date if they were not satisfied with the first one??  Cheap shot to retaliate, or not?? Just wondering what others think.

so he get's OTC time and maybe she is overserved......and he gives her 3?  Damn.

Pretty nasty payback for couple hours OTC from a provider with previous outstanding reviews from all her clients IMHO.

I personally think his experience was exactly what happened.  This is also from my experience with her.  I think she has some issues that others may not have picked up on.  Cobra1, NYState and TungoFun - flame me please as you seem to be her biggest fans.  I don't believe in doing reviews for this exact reason - you get the guys who are going to defend her and make you look like the bad guy.  OK so without even doing a review now I'm the bad guy - RIGHT??  If anyone wants details from me them PM me and I will share.  Definitely NOT worth her increase 4 bill donation!!

Since you are using an alias, you may even be the gent who wrote the suspect review in the first place for all we know.  And BTW I am no white knight. Simply started this thread asking a legitimate question.

Actually I thank you for starting your thread as it brings much more attention to Lisa than ordinary.  Also I wasn't the one to post the review but I will do what I need to do to let hobbyists know about the other side of LL.

I believe the readers have you and your personal agenda sorted out in short order. Particularly since it appears clear from the link the lady posted to your Aug 4th reply that you have never in fact met her. That's my final comment re you as I'm certain our members prefer to arrive at their conclusions without a debate between us.

END OF MESSAGE

Hey Average, thank you for inviting me to your party.  I agree with your response to your rhetorical question, RIGHT about the bad guy!

Him and I messaged before the review went up. I did not know who he was talking about until the review actually posted. Let's just say some details can't be shared that would make anyone in that position uncomfortable or upset. Hoping to rebook and see a better side of her is something more hobbyists should consider and her choosing not to ensured his only memory of her would be a poor one, thus this review. To suggest it's punishment for not rebooking him is silly though I can see that perspective if you don't know this person. He is very nice and quite - I can't describe him more than that other than to say he is in my opinion a cutie and someone I love to hang out with and talk hobby with on and off the clock.

I don't know the lady in question - however as an aspiring top provider I strongly suggest reconsidering the appointment. Maybe we can double him, LOL.

There are some chords in this review that don’t seem to be in harmony with what I consider to be the real world.

Let me start by saying that I’ve never met Lisa Lang nor had any communication with her and its actually very likely that I won’t since I don’t do outcalls and she doesn’t do in calls.

The hobbyist states that he typically goes with experienced providers yet he intentionally chose a new gal with only a few good reviews under her belt.  Mistake #1....he clearly needs an inexperienced provider who can handle his issues with ED, hand jobs, foot jobs and his subsequent snow jobs.....

The hobbyist states that he is “turned off” when called by his handle.  It reminds him that this is a business and he’s paying for pussy.   I would then kindly suggest that he picked the wrong fucking handle.  He needs to immediately change his handle to something like StudMuffin, Big Dick, Mega BigBoy, Cuddly Bunny or....you get my drift.  By the way, if this is such an issue, then perhaps one should give your provider a heads up and suggest another name to call you.  See above.....

The hobbyist states that Lisa continually asked his real name and he was uncomfortable telling her.  This makes perfect sense, however, what does not make perfect sense is the fact that he continued to say no...no...no.  Maybe....after the second time the hobbyist could have made up a name....again see above.  I might have said that my name is Wyatt Earp, but you can call me Wyatt. End of discussion....

I admit that I’m far from the most experienced hobbyist, yet I don’t recall one single review where I was asked to comment about table manners and whether or not she was ladylike.  In fact, to be honest, I normally pay them to be very unladylike.......if that’s even a word....

However, for me the final straw is that after telling us numerous times that Lisa perhaps had a problem with alcohol and even suggests several times that the alcohol was responsible for her erratic behavior.

“She's sensitive to alcohol, and I believe that was what contributed to her behavior.”

“It was probably the alcohol that got to her, or maybe that's how she actually is.”

“As long as alcohol isn't in the picture, I'm sure Lisa would be just fine in public.”

After all of that, the hobbyist still walked her to her car at her request.  What kind of responsible adult would let her drive home in the condition that the review suggests that she was in....????

The review started with, “Took a year off from the hobby and it's good to be back.”  Perhaps another two or three year to mature before you come back.....

I think Antonio hit it right.  As for Lisa, she is a charming, beautiful with outstanding skills, young woman.  My date with her was FANTASTIC and I would recommend her to others without a doubt.  I sense some jealousy or alternative motives lurking here..

It seriously blows me away how someone can rate a provider a three after admitting she tried hard during the actual session.  Who cares how she acts off the clock?  That's not why I consult this site.  You made it seem like she kept an open mind and even seemed interested in trying new things.  That alone separates her from the majority of providers in SD.  It's not her fault he couldn't stay hard long enough to don a rubber.  
If you didn't like how she acted OTC, then don't hang out with her OTC.  Otherwise, reviews need to remain focused strictly on the session.
 P.S. I've never seen Lisa, but I admit I hope she is for real as her pictures make her out to be exactly my type.
 

Just to clarify, the "you" I mentioned in my post was meant for the reviewer, not Cobra.

lol. I knew you weren't referring to me bic54. And I can attest to the fact those photos are indeed Lisa. Plus she's got a beautiful face and personality to go with them.

END OF MESSAGE

I am willing to schedule an appointment with Lisa and get this thing figured out.

-- Modified on 9/5/2014 4:28:14 PM

Just noticed while looking at a new review on Tara Bentley, the #7 rated provider in SD,  that the reviewer who slammed Miss Lang did the same thing to Miss Bentley last year. Once again it was a case of the lady not offering him a second date to "redeem herself" as he put it. He rated her a "2" for performance when, like Lisa Lang, all her other reviews were outstanding. While two reviews may not constitute a pattern, there is remarkable similarity in what occurred here.

END OF MESSAGE

Good research Scorp!!!!!

Unfortunately that goes both ways - not accusing you of anything, since we have never met and probably never will. Just pointing out that the providers are equally guilty of this particular tactic...