I have seen this lady before but it has been over a year since I've seen her.  She has two recent reviews that say she has provided FS without a condom.  Both of the reviewers have more than one review so it doesn't appear that somebody is out to get her.

This seems out of character from the lady I met but maybe things have changed for her.  In a way this a warning to stay away and a message of disbelief that she is doing this.  I hope she turns things around as she proudly displayed a picture of her child when I last saw her.  She seems headed down the wrong path now.

I too noticed this and concur it sends a dangerous message for anyone who has experienced this "option" (??). Additionally, it puts others at risk, those hobiest who have "dipped from the well" could put the rest of us at risk with other providers. I have spoken to one provider who is pissed and intends on calling Cindy and asking her what she is doing... I am a firm believer in BBBJ, but run and hide at the thought of BBFS. I have too many things I still want to accomplish in my life as I'm sure you all do as well.. Let's be safe and use this forum for scary situations such as this...JF

I have seen Cindy three times and during out last encounter we ran out of covers and she wanted me to "just put it in". Luckily I was thinking with the big head and did not do it. Be careful guys!!!

Of course it is highly risky for this lady to act this way.  But it is also, IMHO, delusional for anyone to take the stand that SHE is endangering anyone else.  The FACT is, with or without these posts, providers and frequent hobbyists engage in activities that, due to the number of different partners, require them to take their OWN actions with respect to safety.

In fact, it is VERY unlikely, based upon the odds, that Cindy is endangering other providers - Mostly, she is endangering herself.  To a lesser degree, she is endangering her clientele, as Males tend not to get this disease through heterosexual contact with anything CLOSE to the frequency that women do.  The fact is, any provider is FAR more likely to get the disease from contact with a client who has used IV drugs, or who has engaged in unprotected homosexual contact, and is in fact bisexual, than from a heterosexual client who might have had a couple of sessions with Cindy.  The self-righteousness of anyone who would presume that what CINDY is doing is endangering THEM (as opposed to herself) is palpable.  One must ASSUME that when they engage in sex with multiple partners on a casual (as opposed to a faithful romantic) basis - that they will come into contact with any number of folks who have become HIV positive through any number of means.  And they must take THEIR OWN precautions and act accordingly.

With respect to Cindy, given the evidence at hand, what she needs desperately is counseling and intervention so that whatever has put her into this self-destructive mode can be alleviated.  What she doesn't need is self-righteous and deluded folks condemning her for endangering THEM - because that is a fallacy.  We are each accountable to ourselves for our own choices.  And if what SHE did put YOU at risk, I would counter that in fact, it was YOU who's actions put YOURSELF at risk.

I completely agree with your statements regarding responsibility for your own safety.  I posted hoping to get some feedback from others to see if they had the same experience as this did not seem like the lady I met.  However, my main point was that I'm concerned for her.  When I met her she seemed like a nice mom trying to make ends meet after a divorce.  It seems she is sliding down a slippery slope now.  I hope somebody who knows her well will provide that intervention that you recommended.

Not to scare unnecessarily, but there was a case a couple of years ago in New York city where a provider had contracted HIV.  She was so depressed and distraught, yet angered by what happened to her that she went around intentionally infecting her "dates" as if to strike revenge.  

I also seem to remember a case down in Texas about 6 or so years ago where a lady, nicknamed "Black Widow" or "Widowmaker" (or something like that), who was infected and she too decided to strike a blow for revenge against unsuspecting males.  Might be true, might not.  Just be careful.  I for one will be taking Cindy out of my Favorites list.  

P.S., I see she does anal for clients.  That ought to hint at something....

isn't that taking it just a little too far? I don't know which reviewers wrote the reviews but it wouldn't be the first time that a little addition was made to the reviews to make it look like a guy was such a hot stud she had to have him there and now and bareback. And if the guy before had it in a review, why couldn't one guy get the idea from the last one? I'm not saying they are fibbing to add to the juicy part, but if we are going to throw in the idea that she could be the black widow, can we at least consider that it may not be true at all? It wouldn't be the first time that the juicy details are fudged a little and someone jumps on the bandwagon and said hey--it happened to me too!!

And her offering anal is supposed to hint at what? He didn't say he had uncovered anal, did he? So what does it say? Anal may not be the safest or most comfortable offering, but I don't think the fact that a provider offers anal adds weight to the black widow theory.

I didn't see where see offerred or provided someone with anal....Where did you see that.  I do not post reviews, but I had an uncovered opportunity back in October with this provider.

First, I've not met the lady being discussed. I have no idea if the opinions expressed are accurate or not. I have seen that she has consistantly received very positive reviews, although her punctuality has been an issue for some.

Nowe I see posts about "questionable" hygenic practices and rampant speculation regarding her motivations. Sdjim, YOU started this mess with your post, specifically warning others to "stay away and a message of disbelief that she is doing this."

Your post makes me wonder what your true motivation is? If you are concerned about her, it would have been more appropriate for you to contact her directly-informing her that there have been reports of her activities. The other motivation is to disrupt her business and cause her injury by pointing out what you perceive to be unsafe practices.

If you were concenred for your own health, you could have quietly opted out of ever seeing her again. For the rest of you who are "concerned hobbiests", carry your own coverage and NEVER engage in any activity without your own "insurance."

Your created a case of "all the kings' horses and all the kings' men, can't restore Cindy's reputation again."

You're a bunch of selfish, self-absorbed @$$'s!

Do you provide this service bimbo??

eom

With TER posting about 100 reviews a day lately, I could have easily missed this.  I don't pretend to think that being involved in this hobby is 100% safe for either party.  However, I do use information that is available to make decisions regarding the level of risk I'm willing to take.  

This kind of post has been put up about some well regarded providers in LA and, when it was pointed out, many came out to dispute this and the reviews were removed.  So far, not one person has come out to say that Cindy didn't do this and others have come out and said that this type of service was offered.

Am I the guy that ruined her reputation?  I don't think so.  She is responsible for her own reputation just like we all are.  If somebody had come out and said that this was a lie then I would have been the first to ask TER to have the reviews removed.  

My motivation was to bring the information posted by others to the board so that it could be discussed.  As it turns out, others have had a similar experience.  

I think Cindy is a nice lady and hate to see what was written about her be reaffirmed by others.  This is just information that has been written by others to allow each individual to decide who they want to see like any other review is.

I totally agree, if everyone would stop acting like little bitches, and be MEN! What, is she holding a gun to your head to call her or have bbfs with her!  

This is worse than a girls locker room, tell you what, go in your closet and get that old spine out and put it in,........nuff said!!!!