I'm wondering from the guys some of the reasons they don't review a girl til later down the road. Or in some cases where they wait and then write 4 or 5 reviews at the same time.
Is there a reason for this I'm not getting?
Esp. when this site was founded on the review process. Esp. when you are hobbying and see multiple providers.
I would think writing a review would best be done briefly after the encounter. When things are fresh in your 'head'.
I ask this because I see reviewers put up multiple reviews at one time. Mostly seeming generic, even down to same scores. They don't seem to really speak for each girl.
I have had reviews come up months after.
I can tell from the basics who wrote it. But I can tell detials were either lost or embellished.

For the most part it doesn't seen to harm the review process. Just seems reviews would be better if they weren't done months later or just for extra days membership.
Or am I missing something....
OX,
Jai

the withdrawn delay, the embellishing, the fact that men are dogs and see as many women as possible.  We hate ourselves and rather than face up to the facts, we hold those reviews in like consecutive prison sentences, each one building and blurring upon each other until the final release.  Ahhhhh.  That lemming urge to vaunt over TER's cumbersome review writing process.  

Geez, did I really have to know her cup size?  Her current webpage, email, telephone number, etc.  Do I really have to rank her and ack - attitude and whatever else.  I just want to brag and perhaps be somewhat informative.  Or at least get 15 free days so I can continue to lurch toward some some some...  Is it really important that she was on drugs, that she rushed me, that her pimp was standing outside?  Was it important that I hadn't bathed in days, that my hair was greasy, and that my sixth toe continue to attract the unwanted attention of the grandmother next door?

but yeah, mostly it's because most of the reviews on this site appear to be fake, either written by the ladies themselves or someone looking for free VIP access.  Those few literate souls who can put a comma in it's correct syntax in a timely manner, well.  More power to them.  Especially if they can speak some semblance of truth, making their effort beneficial to others.  In that kind, truthful but not overbearingly brunt manner that really pisses someone off.  That keeps ladies from seeing you.  That makes protective white nights send you threatening PMs.  Or yeah, all those newbies asking you down thru the ages if she really liked having fingers stuck up her various orifices.  etc. etc.

Reviews tell more about the writer than the subject anyhow.  This much is true.  Rant off,

or drinking Bong water.
Wow, you sound like some whacko chick.
Did you even read/address the question?
Did you just insult TER and call them fake?
As well as, any member that's ever wrote a good review or earned one?
And the google link?????
Seems like someone pissed you off...!!

Sorry the weekend doesn't seem to be going well for you.
I'll wish the best for you...

-- Modified on 3/3/2007 7:20:36 PM

-- Modified on 3/3/2007 7:03:22 PM

When I write a review, I want it to be an honest representation of the experience I had, so to do that, I have to write it before a lot of time has pasted. In some cases, it may take me around a week to post a review, but that's because I only really "hobby" when I travel, and I don't have a laptop with me, so I have to wait to get home. The only reason I can see to write a bunch all at the same time is to maybe get a longer period of VIP time maybe, instead of 2 weeks here and 2 weeks there? That's the only thing That I can think of, other than just plain laziness.

the poster did not even comment on your question.
It read to me as more of a bitter, depressed rant than anything else. Whether it was a man or a woman, I don't think I'm in any hurry to meet them. Who needs to be bummed out?

...don't like women to know their "handle".  By reviewing a couple of months down the road it's less likely that a woman will remember them thus preserving the "integrity" of the review by its anonymity.

ha!

Because of the issues you mentioned, to get full use and benefit of this site, you must do much more than read a couple of reviews and rely on the numerical rankings.  Until you are comfortable with the veracity of the reviewers, you need to investigate reviews that are of interest to you by clicking on the name of the reviewer.  If the reviews are clustered over a particular point in time, then it is probably for free membership and suspect.  If the guy gives nothing but 10's -- well, some people are incredibly lucky, but how many once in a life time experiences can you have?  If the guy's review significantly out of step with the others, either high or low, then the experience could either be an aberation (which is probably the case if it is low) or the review could be unreliable (if it is high).  You also need to be skeptical if the review reports on an experience that is inconsistent with the others.  For example, if the review says she does anal and none of the other 10 pages of reviews report a poop chute ride, the guy either missed doing doggie and his dick was so small she did not notice or he could be lying.

-- Modified on 3/5/2007 8:26:01 AM

There are a few reasons why this happens.  Sometimes its laziness, sometimes there's no time to do it immediately, and sometimes whether to write the review is the question. Especially in cases where the review will be partially negative.  In those cases, I want to write with a cool head and be as fair as possible.

I also prefer some time to go by before writing a review to gain a little perspective about the experience.  I have underrated a few providers in the past for things that detracted from the session but were not as important as I thought at the time.

....reflect info from the inital reviewer and are almost always outdated on one or more critical items. Subsequent reviews, even though profile info is required as part of the review, DO NOT actually update the profile. This makes doing reviews tedious since most of the info you input doesn't do anything or go anywhere. This is a flaw in the review process that really needs to be addressed by TER leadership. It make searches almost a waste of time. This topic also comes up from time to time on the boards but I have never seen a TER response - just MANY excellent member suggestions to TER.

"Those few literate souls who can put a comma in it's correct syntax in a timely manner, well.  More power to them. "

Or apostrophe.  Its, not it's.
Just messin' wit ya. Yes, there's always a detail that I don't know, cup size?  I don't usually ask.  And don't go out of my way to count tattoos.  But I sure appreciate having reviews available when I need 'em.

-- Modified on 3/5/2007 11:48:39 AM

This is a very important point, because unless the provider is new, the information is usually outdated.  

Services, incall/outcall status, donations change over time. Having current information would be a huge improvement.

What makes it frustrating is that the information is captured, but not available to hobbyists that could put it to good use.

That's what the problem report button is for.
I have turned in corrections a number of times and TER has updated it without an issue in
24-72 hrs. And you get a couple days credit on your membership.

there is some point of refernce to point that out.
Like when I make rate changes. I refer them to an ad or site where the correct rates are posted.