Porn Stars

TER staff needs to address this...
Rockmehard 46 Reviews 7955 reads
posted
1 / 12

Spent some high quality time with the Mynxster last nite which moved her into my #1 all time BJ slot!  Drooling, slurping, spitting and wicked eye contact (excuse me if I am too graphic for our more delicate members).  The girl has fantasic skills and puts on an outstanding show!

I know the price is stiff but I had to pony up at least once to get close to that incredible butt.  I am contacting the Bush administration about nominating it for National Monument status.

I would love to do a review but since I have now had 4 reviews inexplicably "Unapproved" I won't be wasting my time until I get a reasonable explaination (or any explanation instead of no communication) from TER.

She is highly recommended, 10-10 for those of you keeping score.

RP  

singleton 5 Reviews 6921 reads
posted
2 / 12

doesn't Elegant Angel (or Pat himself) take a plaster- (or plasticine) -cast mold of all those heavenly buns annointed  with the title of "Buttwoman" anyway?

i believe it was almost 2 years ago to the day that my ATF, Belladonna herself, became the wearer of that "royal crown" ... a National Monument i wouldn't mind erectly "saluting" every morning when i wake up!  ;-)

--

btw, i think you owe it to your fellow Mynxsters to post a review ... a mere 10/10 isn't enough to satiate their appetite for (graphic) juicy details when it comes to her!  LOL

-- Modified on 8/30/2003 10:48:46 AM

colhogan 7 Reviews 8197 reads
posted
3 / 12

Please do post it and dont leave anything out i am in agreement with singleton you owe it to us hobbist i might have to join the ranks of the mynxster clan

col hogan
BTW she was my all time favorite i have the calises to prove it
lol

Angelo 8096 reads
posted
5 / 12

I, too, have had submitted reviews that were not accepted. In my case, there "not enough explicit details." I've seen others, that were accepted, that had far fewer. So I don't try anymore, either.

AA

Slanteater 7623 reads
posted
6 / 12

...too much time is being spent by too many people writing reviews that are rejected and then we're never told how to fix them. As some of you know, I have griped about this before. I had my review writing priviliges REVOKED because I kept resubmiting a review I had tried to fix. And I only did this after my questions regarding the review went unanswered. They don't have the time, or don't want to make the time, to answer questions about rejected reviews -- then they get pissed off when you try to fix the problem yourself.

All we're asking for is a little more communication.  Later, when I asked for a more specific heading than the popular "this provider's reviews are no longer available" (or whatever it says when a provider's reviews vanish) I was told it was purposely vague to protect TER from lawsuits. Now that I think of it, maybe this is a similar situation.

In any case, it's frustrating...

jpb1023 10 Reviews 7236 reads
posted
7 / 12

How was the anal and the dfk.
Did you also do her feet justice?
She loves that.
And finally where was the deposit?
Mouth or face?

A Spectator 6513 reads
posted
8 / 12

passed the test and got posted.  Quite often, they pay less notice to well known reviewers or reviews of well-established ladies.  It is the new reviewers or new ladies under reviews that are placed under the most scrutiny.

You just have to keep trying.  Once you have a few reviews under the belt, it would be a lot easier.

p.s. sometimes the "not enough explicit details" referred to the fact that the ratio of explicit detail compared to the other description is too low for them to approve the review.  If you cut down on the other part of the reviews or descibe the actual sex act more, your review might be approved.

Just keep trying.

singleton 5 Reviews 6892 reads
posted
9 / 12


besides the explicitness factor Spec already addressed is one of providing PROOF of authenticity

i don't know how scrutinous TER is about this but if it was up to ME to verify the validity of a review (and i'm talking completely genrally here, not saying yours or anyone else's wasn't valid) i would look for telltale signs that this guy IS NOT FAKING A REVIEW  by simply cutting-n-pasting his from other reviews

frankly, the type of review i'm talking about really bothers me too. "she was great with BBBJ. we did some CG and CFS. then i asked her for Russian and got some Asian in return, etc"  in other words a description that could fit almost ANY provider.  when i come across reviews of girls i know i specifically look to see if the reviewe says anything that would make me believe that he was actually there and saw this girl. it could be little details of her apartment, her clothes, ANYTHING that makes me believe it's a legit (not faked) review.

alls i'm saying is that it behooves us all to provide adequate proof of this (without compromising her privacy of course) AND simultaneously provide adequate details to be of use to other hobbyists. i honestly think if you make a good-will effort to do BOTH of these, you will get your reviews approved

i've always said, that other than just added statistical certainty for a provider's ratings, reviews that don't provide even one little tid-bit of trivia, knowledge, personal interpretation, commentary, etc ... serve very little purpose. ... espeially with girls like Playmate Morgan Ashley who has page upon page of glowing (near) 10/10 reviews -- actually speaking of her, her's is an intersting case, cuz she started out with 7s/8s about three years ago and over time has reached her current 10/10 status -- which goes to show you how useful numerical "trends" can be to the database afficcionado!  ;-)

A Spectator 6388 reads
posted
10 / 12

Ms. Ashley's review is concerned.  I believe her rate and rating skyrocketed after she included CIM and Greek in her menu.  In addition, people do change overtime.

With better makeup, clothings, broader experience that came with knowing how to please men and extensive traveling, coupled with the remarkable marketing skill, it is hard for a reviewer to say something different. :-)

p.s. I have yet to meet Ms. Morgan Ashley and I am not one of her big fans.  I just comment on what I have observed from the sideline.

singleton 5 Reviews 7338 reads
posted
11 / 12


since i unintentionally insulted her by telling her that i thought J-Lo was unattractive (i guess some guys think she's a J-Lo look-alike) ... well that and another thing, she found out i was a Liberal!  LOL

Rockmehard 46 Reviews 8356 reads
posted
12 / 12

First, Tiff told me (before I brought it up) she doesn't do anal because of an injury on a shoot a while back.  I can't tell you whether this is a fact with everybody or if it was because she was staring up at my really excited member.

DFK was very nice but it's not my thing nor is the foot thing.  I did spend a whole lot of time worshipping her magnificent ass.

The only deposits I make are in my raincoat.  I know a lot of you guys want to here about BBBJTC, but to me that's a death wish for the provider and you (do you think your the only one?).  I tend to avoid providers were stuff like that is mentioned in previous reviews.

And now to Mr. Singleton's comment.  If TER had the courtesy to reply, I would be more than happy to give them any confirming evidence they needed.  I did an extensive review on Keisha, I knew her before our meeting.  If they want to confirm she knows who I am.  The other one is on Raylin who told me SHE doesn't know why she is a banned provider.  Then the others are a few locals.

I don't need to make these up.  I don't have the time.  I'm just trying to do my part because other reviews have helped me.

RP

Register Now!