Anyone know if Divini Rae or any other playboy playmates for that matter are available as providers??  I am sure they would be UTR or use an alias??

What you are asking is a no sense.

Let me explain why:

Playboy playmates, Maxim Models, Penthous Pets, and so forth are not object of discussion, in any direction, since their status is by definition "out of the public domain."

There are few channels, and in relationship to this board, the main avenue is backchanneling. This avenue is not available for the mass, neither for those who have a very short post history on TER, or a very tiny resume in their review records in terms of high end porn stars, or semi-UTRs.

Before anyone qualify for the that channel, 'reputation' as an high profile hobbysts has to be build.

Until then, any question about UTR in general is, to be put blunty, not a matter of interest for many.

The other channels are being member of high end agencies, or having previous direct contact with a Playboy playmates or other UTRs.

Same rule apply: as long you are not a 'high profile hobbysts' these other channels are in general precluded.

Anything you will get as response in "public domain" like this board in regard to Playboy Playmates, etc or UTRs in general is general speaking 'useless'.

If you have further questions feel free to pm me.

Sincerely,
BM

She was possibly available years ago, but she's currently married to a rich guy so she wouldn't need to anymore.

About other playmates, you may be able to find a few at tlc and a few at lourdes, but since bella went down years ago it's been difficult to find one agency that provides playmates in large numbers.

Now there's an agency called Beautifulintroductions that has many available, but little is known about their reliability.

And given that I'm a member of multiple agencies I can say with complete confidence that most porn girls are available. Even the ones that swear they aren't.

And unlike you, I freely give that information out to those that ask instead of attempting to retain a monopoly on it to try and keep some inflated sense of self-importance.

As for Bella, if you have another site that provides the service better than they did by all means share with us their name.

Furthermore, from what I've seen of your posts you've done nothing but criticize those that post information and bemoan how things are different from years ago, which shows you have even less to add than those who do post.

Also I'm aware of how things "used" to be on this board years ago and I recall that utr information was never posted and kept among a small group of people. Well to me that defeats the purpose of the forum, it's a place to share info not keep it limited to only a few people.

First, the use of the word 'possibly' tell me you have no clue in regard to the Playmate in question, and the fact you are careless about 'her privacy' tell me you have no respect whatsoever. But that is not new so there is no surprise here.

Second, you have no clue about what happened in the UTR market after 'bella went down', otherwise you could not argue about 'one agency that provides playmate in large numbers.' 'Large numbers' is not the criteria by which agencies select Playboy Playmates, Penthous Pets, Maxim Models, etc. But since you have no idea about that criteria, what you are implying about the 'large numbers' just reveal how your understanding of the new UTRs market lack in several crucial dimensions.

Third, speaking of 'reliability' simple said you have no clue about how the agency operates, same for 'whom is available from this agency."

I anticipated that 'everything he will get as response in board like this' would be an example of useless information. This is clear the case. You may want update your knowledge about the UTRs and the porn stars market rather that enlighting everyone with the lack of understanding that is displayed each time you post the amazing revelation that "virtually every girl in the industry is available even biggest names and the ones who constantly say they aren't."

This lack of competence and knowledge about facts, persons and contexts is what make this type of post completely useless. Unfortunately this is becoming the norm in the PS Board, rather than the exception. But that is not surprising, and to repeat again:

When a board is not populated by 'high profile hobbyist' everything takes the low road, and once you take it coming back is not going to be easy.

Sincerely,
BM

You complete confidence is based on the amazing revelation that 'everyone is available.' Of course, I am sure that this a huge contributions. And I bet that 'the agencies' of which you are members appreciate that 'revelation.' A revelation that lack the minimum requirement for being member of an agency.

You give 'freely information' that is both useless, since it lack the minimum requirement of accountability (no reviews, story of free shooting posting, etc.), and uncorrect, since it lack competence, understanding of facts, persons and contexts. Also it show lack of respect for the people involved in your posting. Freely information is the game of those hobbyists who profile is a low as it can be.

I post about what I think are important issues, and criticism is part of the contributions the way I learned from Eddie. I leave to the others the depressing, and illusionary vision of making posts about Who is she, Is she provides, Everyone is available, and so forth.

UTRs information is not a monopoly, since everyone who has a 'high profile' can get it. Different is the use of this information, which by nature is confidential and has less to do with small circles, but with 'respect' of the people involved in the UTRs segment. As such, anyone who violate that 'confidentiality' is going to make damage he in general has no idea. No surprise, that this board has become a total wasteland in terms of agencies, porn stars, etc.

The fact, that you and many, think otherwise, making this 'information' available for free (when in 100% of the case is even uncorrect) say it all: Lack of respect, violation of confidentiality, privacy and other requirements.

What defy the purpose of this board is the present of 'low profile hobbyists' who approach to hobby is like that of Mr Boongle, who since lack everything, the only things that they can do is 'shoot for free' on a public domain, and who careless attitude about what they post is a measure of the level this Board has reached.

Of course, you can 'shoot for free' because in reality you and many many others have no idea about what a community of high profile hobbyist should conduce themselves.