I assume by now you all know that the TER board moderators no longer approve messages. That job is now being down by a staff of in-house employees whose only job is to approve or deny posts. TER feels that this will result in messages getting posted much quicker.

Seems like it's working, but I think this board is a little different than the regional boards in as much as there are a lot of PSEs who are Under The Radar; something the in-house people aren't aware of.

So PLEASE... think twice before posting about a girl. If she's not on Body Miracle's site, has no Eros or Cityvibe ads, isn't mentioned in a post by Lexxi or Demi, please PM Sly or myself to see if she's openly available before mentioning her on the board.

Thanks

Excellent point! we need to self police that kinda info

Isn't this board about sharing info? Info on pro's should not be deleted an held by a lucky few.

But with pretty much everything in life, there are boundaries.  To follow your logic, if I was a "lucky few" to have a "pro's" private phone number and and her home address, then there wouldn't be any problem with posting that information.  Now, that wouldn't be right, would it!?  Or, what if a provider has an ad that has a real photo of her but it is blurred.  And, I happened to have the same photo that is unblurred.  Is it right for me to post it here even though she obviously doesn't want it posted?  Gotta respect people's privacy no matter what the situation or place is.

As someone who hasn't been around the scene for more than 5 years (and PS for prob only 2-3) there's a TON of girls out there that are UTR. That's evidenced by the fact that either you, Ed or Sly, some time back made a "UTR Playmate/Penthouse Pet/Cyber Girl/whatever list" but that it only went to those w/ a certain number of credited reviewed PS's. I do not qualify cause I've been with 7 PS's but only reviewed 1 so I don't even come close to qualifying for that list.  I also am not going to send a PM to someone everytime I'm curious if a girl provides.

I would've much rather had the old way of "Hey, does anyone know if (Jane Doe) is available? PM w/ info if needed."

But that's just me.

Eddie is not saying to stop with the "Hey does Suzi Superportstar provide?".

He is asking that if you know that Suzi Superpornstar does provide to a limited group, and is trying to keep it quiet - hence the no ads, etc. - that you don not announce her availability to the general public here on the board.  Think about it for a second - this is a public forum, and anybody can read the posts.

Suzi's SO, her manager, or some crazy stalker of hers (which the superstars probably have plenty of), can read all about it here.....

Or, we could flip it around - You are most likely UTR as a hobbiest(I certainly am) - would it be good if we provided YOUR personal info here with your name so that anyone with Google could find out that you utilize this board?

I understand what you are saying and I agree to a point,this is a place for exchange of information ...however, some topics might need to be discussed in a different manner than others....for me the term "under the radar" does not mean secret or sacrosanct from any discussion rather, it means literally under the radar as in back channel or pm....I mean if a gal was UTR and there was never *ANY* discussion she would seldom be booked.....all Eddie is saying is, quite rightly, respect a ladies choice to be UTR and only share that info via pm or back channel lest you scare her out of providing all together

-- Modified on 2/16/2009 9:28:18 PM

i hadn't thought of it that way .but i would still kill to that list of playmates,but it sucks not to be able to talk about a couple of the hot utrs i've had,oh well i can still talk to myself about them ,i feel a little talking coming on right now gotta go.

Is there any way to do a members only UTR review board or review process for upstanding members? Just a thought? I wouldn't mind sharing some of mine and getting some info too.

Even if I missed the original point of his post, which I'll admit I full well may have...  you're last paragraph is retarded and irrelevant to the point "I" was trying to make. If you have issue's w/ some moron who is openly posting info about UTR's take your response up to them, not me. I've never posted info on a UTR person openly and never will.

I replied "PM me" to a request for info and according to the new guidelines was disapproved and no longer a valid response. The only way now to get UTR info is to ask for it and have that person send a PM, provided that person believes you are worthy enough for the info.  That was my only point I was trying to make, that and I don't like the new policies. I preferred the old way w/ moderators who were involved and understood people, how things were, WHO people were, etc.  If I typed it poorly, or in an unclear way I would apologize but you're last comment in your response is completely uncalled for, nor warranted.

Sure a private forum would work.  I could start it.  Then as soon as I add the second person, it is no longer private.  Maybe it is someone I trust.  But what about the 3rd or 4th or whatever.

Sooner or later, the 'wrong' person will get in and have access to all the info.

There is no good answer to this problem.