While I agree as many others on this site have said, that what a women does or doesn't want to do with her body is her right. Ms Kross wants to post her fans emails & photos online that she finds rude, which I equate to those people who try to close porn store & strip clubs by harassing their patron. If Ms Kross thinks this will help her sell DVD's, she wrong.

I was searching to see if Kayden Kross provides and I came across this blog rant.  Call me stubborn or thick-skulled...but it doesn't necessarily say to me that she doesn't provide maybe UTR.  She just hates slobs assuming she will bone them cuz she's a pornstar.

Anyway, she probably doesn't provide, but if anyone has any info otherwise I would appreciate a PM.  She is the absolute top pornstar on my "list" that I haven't seen.

Thanks!

notices making it clear she doesn't provide.  Always wondered about Kayden, who is one of the hottest PS gals I've seen.  Always possible she's UTR but I doubt it from the tone of the blog post.

On her last web show which she did on July 12, Lisa Ann clearly ranted that it is an insult if a man approached her about prostituting. As a result, never expect her to dabble inside the hobby world.

makes her too moral for the hobby world.

However, it never hurts to try picking her up if she happened to be in the same bar or party. Who knows by the end of the night you may had sex with a porn star and never paid a cent for the sexual act.

If anyone follows Lisa's twitter she's always talking about the guys she meets in cities where she's featuring and hooking up with them.

So would she really turn down a polite offer of $25,000 or $50,000? Doubtful.

My guess is she doesn't want guys coming up to her at strip clubs thinking that they can book her for $2000.

And the rumor with Kayden is that she used to be available through a sugar daddy site.

And if that's true then she probably wouldn't turn down a five figure offer either.

There was an ad for her from Real Entertainment being available in Vegas during the AVNs, but there has been some questions about that company. I'm pretty sure someone here said she'd been on sugar daddy websites before.

I agree. I think she was ranting about the overall assumption that any old schlub would have a chance to stick her since she is in the biz. She never mentioned anything about the well to do gent who has no problem dropping a few grand just to be in her company. I'm sure after the cash starts flying she may change her tune....As long as you don't resemble a walrus! Ha!! Personally this type of attitude is a huge turn off for me, there are plenty of smoking hot ladies!!!

Thanks for the replies everyone.  Appreciate the different opinions.

I know for a fact that she was available.  I had the chance to book her about a year ago but the price and hour minimum were way too much.

WHO CARES GIRLS FAR PRETTIER THAN HER ARE AVAILABLE IE NIKKI LOREN JESSIE PALMER ISIS TAYLOR AND ON AND ON

All Kayden said was that if someone emails her asking for her services, she's going to publish their emails.  That's her way of saying "DON'T ASK!" If she's UTR through some agency or whatever, that's her business.

Maybe she's just not into the one-time scene thing on camera and off.

She's a beautiful and intelligent woman and I won't denigrate her because she chooses not to openly meet fans.  I'd probably give up my left nut to have sex with her.  If I were in her shoes, I think the smarter financial play would be one or more rich sugar daddies rather than a bunch of short term bookings.  I'm sure some of the ladies on this board could venture an assessment of the sugar daddies in LA.

For what it's worth, I think she's often very entertaining on blog, twitter, formspring, etc. and I regularly check in on her writing because she's interesting.  I really don't care for her on camera work.

Interesting position by Kayden Kross - and I believed this to be true, until I ran across this webpage.