Porn Stars

I agree...
big78 120 Reviews 2500 reads
posted
1 / 7

Per my post below, TER has introduced a new feature called the Whitelist:

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=50143&boardID=23

I'd like to hear what you all think about this concept?

Sly

jmb 140 Reviews 2494 reads
posted
2 / 7

The concept is great.  The issue is how to get the provider community to use it.

Big Ernie McCracken 2283 reads
posted
3 / 7

Why don't they just allow providers to assign a number to the guys they see? You know, 1-10 for appearance and 1-10 for performance. Just like we all do to them. Oh no, we wouldn't like that at all.

haya1300 41 Reviews 2130 reads
posted
4 / 7

I think its a great idea as well.  What a better way for providers to verify someone is who they say they are then hearing from a fellow provider.  I agree with jmb though, it will be a bit of a challenge to get providers to use it.  Unless of course the hobbyist asks them to put something on there on their behalf, like some providers ask to have a review done.

I know there are a LOT of providers who ask specifically NOT to have a review done, but there is no harm is asking, and its between the provider and the hobbbyist.

jmb 140 Reviews 2584 reads
posted
5 / 7

No we would not.  Our behavior and financial satisfaction should be the only things considered in a composite endorsement.

EasyEnough 1722 reads
posted
6 / 7

First TER needs to identify the reasoning for having a White List?  Once that is known that will determine the results and the reasoning be met and achieved.

I find a White List to be semi-beneficial, in that it provides some assistance to a provider in her research on a hobbyist.  That is if they 1) use this board, and are active on this board.

It also provides a false sense of security to a provider as well, and that is a danger in having it.

If I was a poster like "Sly" with over 100 reviews written why would I need an endorsement, and now what is a lady to think when I see a poster like "Sly" with over 100 reviews and no endorsements?

Then EasyEnough comes along, dates 2-3, Indi's that are well know in South Florida, yet post very little on this board, I asked them in return for a review if they will register to endorse me.  

So now EasyEnough has 3 endorsements by no names, and I myself is not well know but some Visiting Lady sees I have some endorsements.

I also do not see how this will work with some sort of real identity information being provided by the Hobbyist for the provider to use....

A Screen Name is a "Virtual" entity?  Unless TER, and all parties involved in establishing a date connection do so at the initial stages through this board software to establish some credibility that I am who I say I am, and that would be EasyEnough.

Not being a naysayer, but TER and Admin's are going to need strong governance to effectively use this tool to achieve the results that I assume they are looking to achieve.

Again without a stated purpose to why, I can only assume its intended purpose.

ThomasJenkins 8 Reviews 2074 reads
posted
7 / 7

What happens when lazy providers (those who don't take the time to properly screen) start to rely on this "white list".  I can see it now... "Before I can see you, I need to know your TER handle for screening".  "I'm sorry, but you're not on the white list, so I can't meet with you".

Personal identifying info, work phone #s, home  phone #s, Cell phone #s, reliable provider references... and now a "White list"??? I think enough is enough already.

As far as the quote... "TER and Admin's are going to need strong governance to effectively use this tool to achieve the results that I assume they are looking to achieve."  The results they are hoping to achieve is simply selling more memberships and are using this as part of a marketing ploy to give "extra perks" for the cost of a membership. Eventually the site will be cluttered with banner ads too.

The "white list" may make for great marketing, but for screening purposes, it will not be very effective.

Register Now!