You can say she had no chance anyway, and you might be right. But she also said she'd told Biden she thought he should appoint a woman of color. I just hope to hell he picks Harris and not Abrams.

And I'm with you, I'd like to see Harris and not Abrams.

Abrams has her eye on being Georgia's Governor..She will clean Kemp's clock next time around..I still think Warren will get the nod for VP..she takes no one's shit and will destroy Pence in a debate if he still wants to stick with the fucking loser in there now..

She could most definitely bring out the base, the base for Trump that is. lol

Biden has health issues?  Name one.  You are confusing him with “Im having trouble walking and using simple objects like a drinking cup” Trump.  

She is wicked smart, but yeah she is a bit of a harpy at times.  That’s not really a problem for VP and she would be president of the senate, which would annoy the shit out of Mitch should he keep his job.  Polls show he is neck and neck with McGrath who is a really solid person and career veteran.

and that fact alone should make you completely sure of your choice. lol

Harris is really the only one that fits that bill and she has massive name recognition. Her tone is moderate, as is her background, so of all the Dems, she strikes me as most presidential. First rule of VP choice is "do no harm."

Presidential candidates rarely want their running mate to upstage them. Remember Kamala Harris kicked Joe's ass pretty easily in one of the debates and she could easily make poor old Dementia Joe look weak compared to her.

joking.  Once the candidate wins the party's nomination, the entire field gets amnesia.  You're from Texas and without pausing, even a nanosecond, you can recall the most obvious example of this principle, from the previous presidential election.

I predict that neither Biden nor Trump will make it through the next 4 years. They will either stroke out or be 25th Amendmented out or otherwise be removed from office. The serving VP, whoever it is, will take over as POTUS.  
.
Will Trump keep Pence on the ticket or throw him under the bus for Nikki Haley (or maybe Ivanka  ?  
.
I don't know much about Abrams other than from coverage of her run for GaGovernor. Harris is "senatorial" and can handle the pressure of DC and I have seen her a lot more in the news, etc.. As a New Yorker, I KNEW from years and years of news coverage that Trump was a pathological liar, an incompetent, a narcissist, and a fraud. I don't know so much about Abrams and Harris.  
.
The next 4-12 years will be about recovery from the huge hit COVID-19 inflicted on the US and the rest of the world. Who has the best ideas and the ability to craft policy and deliver results? We will need BIG programs. E.g., maybe something like the New Deal WPA for repair (REPAIR and RESTORE FIRST, not "NEW" bridges and tunnels to nowhere) of infrastructure. Reps can call it their "Drain the Swamp Program" for improving water treatment and delivery; Dems can call it "Green New Deal" for improving water treatment and delivery: SAME GOAL, DIFFERENT NAME. And so on, down the list of major initiatives.
.
Is health care on the "urgent" list or something to be sidetracked until the other problems are well on the way to recovery? In my opinion, Universal Health Care is DEFINITELY a part of any recovery plan. It removes the burden of health insurance from business, other than as something that their taxes will partially pay for.  It takes "health benefits" out of the equation of hiring and expanding (unless a business wants to offer supplemental insurance options as a benefit).  
.
Do we need a bullet train from San Fran to San Diego and from Boston to DC at a cost of $1B per mile? In the long run, it would be great to have such a public transit option but that would not be a high priority to me, not until other more urgent problems were FIXED. ... unless as a part of planning and implementation of a higher priority project. E.g., if building a huge 80 mile aqueduct, be sure to acquire additional rights of way for future high speed RR tracks. (New York did NOT do that when designing and building the LIE and other roadways in the 1940s. It was a deliberate decision to block the construction of public transit that would give the riff raff access to Long Island.)  
.
Another side rant: In the history of gov funding, NEW projects are much easier to get approved than maintenance and repair projects. Politicians want their names and photos on NEW bridges and tunnels even while the local (city, county) governments can't afford to maintain the ones built 20 years ago by a different politician.  
.
In summary, next VP = future POTUS.

to take over, but he's just not a very colorful and inspiring figure, so even it he got in, I doubt he could get elected in 2024.  It will interesting to see who the Dem counterpart to Pence will be.  Then whichever one wins (Trump or Biden), we should start a ghoul pool to pick the date he croaks.  Maybe TER would sweeten the pot with a few VIP days for the winner?

I always find it amusing when someone who is NOT likely to get picked turns something down.  

a topic you seem all too familiar with.  Bet you have had more than ample non-opportunities, YOU turned down, so your fragile ego would not get completely shattered, again.

So actually you make my point instead of refuting it. Look at who Trump did pick, Mike Pence a guy who was not in the very contentious race for the nomination, and a pick that helped heal the wounds between Trump and the establishment until Trump could make the GOP his own party.

I have complete confidence in KH.  She will not only make an excellent vice president, but will figure out how best she can serve the administration that chose her, while faithfully executing those duties in the most professional way.

Pence is the "Real Thing" and I don't mean that as a compliment.  

Just like when Trump says, "Believe me." That's how you know he's lying.