I'm hoping that there are psychiatrists or psychologists here that can help us understand this LOLROF "Love-Fest!"  Illigitimate POTUS obviously staged this ass-kissing contest.  He ordered his Cabinet to a meeting and proclaimed "it's time for an ass-kissing contest - I wanna see who is the best ass-kisser amongst all of you.  I'll drop my shorts and EVERRYONE kiss my ass and I'll decide who does it best!"

went under the chair and made sure he got the Emperor's full fucking ass to kiss.    He did not see any papers inside that ass that said he can drill in Russia!

a regular fucking fawn fest...

You and the media are just dumbfounded and beside yourselves that anyone would be proud to serve Trump.  It’s terribly sad you’re so easily manipulated by a highly edited excerpt of the public portion of the very first cabinet meeting when all members are finally present. This meeting was a big deal from the standpoint that it took place almost 2 months later than Obama’s first full meeting due to the Senate Democrats joining the “resist” movement.  

...every one of those ass kissing turds is hell bent on destroying the agencies they have been put in charge of, last week was suppose to be "infrastructure week" & most people think infrastructure as roads & bridges, but true infrastructure in our country effects nearly every aspect of our lives. Our airports, our railroad lines, every aspect of our communications, like our postal system ,the food chain, FDA & education, I know there are many more but we are witnessing the destruction of America from the inside & this is how Putin & other enemies of our prosperity want to bring America down. Somehow we must not let that happen, our governmental agencies were put in place to strengthen this country & if this bunch of turds are allowed to destroy them it will take years to put them back in place.

Like Democrats believe health care to be, health care is infrastructure, and nobody has a right to infrastructure, unless you own it.  

Perhaps this will help!

Perhaps one has to drill down past his gerontological degenerative mental disease to the possible mood or personality disorder he demonstrated from childhood. But, the bottom line is, is he fit to be president?

"This meeting was a big deal from the standpoint that it took place almost 2 months later than Obama’s first full meeting due to the Senate Democrats joining the “resist” movement."

How much time did you spend dissecting the video?!

...you are about 180 degrees off, all citizens have an equal right to the infrastructure that our elected officials choose to provide, the only restriction is the V.A. is for qualified military personal only. The big story is who's in charge, people who actually want a system that works well for citizens or one that works so badly that they are forced to use the private sector services, that appears to be a goal of the present administration, otherwise why would so many incompetent  & inexperienced partisan hacks be inducted into cabinet positions?

Try setting up a tent on Amtrack  property, or squatting in one of their coaches.  

...I don't know how can come up with these posts each one more foolish than the last, you must have taken the tweeting course at Trump university.

I have enough time, intelligence and yes - desire and patriotism to make the effort to know when the Press is trying to bullshit me. Let's talk intelligence first. You can't recognize the video I posted was 22 minutes and 49 seconds long? First hint, that’s how long it would take to watch the whole fucking thing. You lose more intelligence points for not realizing that your video was HIGHLY edited. Or maybe you knew that but didn’t care. It's OK when the Press dissects your videos for you, so you don't have to think about reality? Are you telling me that thinking for yourself takes too much time? If you like, I’ll give you those points back and deduct them from your desire, and patriotism columns. Your willingness and gullibility to gobble up every fake news story that fits your prejudice is all too sad.
   

But to your only salient point. . .  Perdue was not even the last cabinet level person confirmed. That dishonor belongs to Robert Lighthizer. Perdue was not even 2nd to last as his confirmation preceded Alex Acosta.

We have now become a 3rd world country.... And this is Newsweek.

Goooooong! Sorry, you've just been gonged of the stage for 3 reasons!

First; "Fake News" was coined by our fake, illegitimate president!

...While I respect all the positive qualities you believe that you apply, in most of your posts I find them to be misapplied, of course the conventional news sources edit tape in order to make their point however honest or dishonest you judge them to be, but in the case of Trumps cabinet meeting the blatant phony fawning praise even in the full unedited tape is unmistakable. Trump & this group of hatchet handed creeps have the goal of cutting these agencies apart & splitting them into bite size pieces so that there work may be digested by private for profit industry. Certainly some of these agencies have operational problems but in most cases the people Trump picked for cabinet positions are woefully unqualified to fix them & that is why it took such an  effort to get them through congressional approval.

Or at the very least begin at about the 12 minute mark where the round table starts? Why not show that? Of course you know why. This is more than "editing to make their point".  The entire round table lasted about 10 minutes so the "non-fawning" far exceeded the "fawning". The fawning is taken so out of context, the casual observer easily comes away with the impression that the entire cabinet meeting was nothing BUT fawning (case in point, the OP).  And the NYT did a very good job with this bit of propaganda. Why did they totally edit out ALL of DOD Sec. Mattis? Answer: He didn't "fawn". THAT bit of editing COMPLETELY FOOLED the OP, MacJohnson.  

The federal government has become too bloated and too powerful. So much so it feels entitled to create regulations that dramatically stifle commerce  and interfere in people's personal freedom and private property rights while very often producing very little good. In far too many cases, the stated reasoning  for the regulations is without merit or the good that is achieved is so small it is impossible to for a rational observer to justify that action.