Promises he won't use force to take Greenland.
Promises he won't impose new tariffs on European countries who criticized his power play to take over Greenland.
Then goes full dementia and serially calls Greenland "Iceland."
Time to invoke the 25th?

Yes, they are joyous because they think Trump failed and don’t recognizes the benefits this deal brings to the US. Also missed the fact that Trump nearly always asks for way more than he’ll ever get when opening a negotiation, only to get what he really wanted in the first place as a “compromise”.

...and calls it Iceland by mistake.  Biden constantly gaffes but never improves lives for Americans.

how Trump "improves lives for Americans?"
Cuz they sure don't think so.

-- Modified on 1/22/2026 8:01:54 AM

"Trump Deal Framework Secures Land, Mineral Rights and Defense Concessions."
A "framework" is jack shit until a final "deal" is signed.  

The latest polls on Trump's (dis)approval ratings . . .
http://www.natesilver.net/p/trump-approval-ratings-nate-silver-bulletin

"A majority of voters disapprove of how Trump has handled top issues including the economy, immigration, the Russia-Ukraine war and his actions in Venezuela. And significantly, a majority of Americans, 51%, said that Trump’s policies had made life less affordable for them."
-
http://static01.nyt.com/images/2026/01/21/multimedia/2026-01-22-national-poll-graphics-index/2026-01-22-national-poll-graphics-index-videoSixteenByNine3000-v3.png

BigPapasan doesn’t seem to understand that before you get to a written agreement, you start with a framework. Or maybe he’s just loathe to admit that President Trump has put together a deal that supports US interests.

1. Trump does over exaggerate when he negotiates

How's your 401K doing?  Remember a year ago when you were screaming about him wiping out all the teachers and firefighters portfolios?  Filled your car up lately?  Are you about to blame him for the winter storm hitting most of the country?

Around 40% have neither a 401K or an IRA. Gas is about the same price as it was 18 months ago.
I love snow, especially when it's falling in Vermont where I just skied today.

Your ignoring him.....401k are up....and gas prices and other things are down and coming down.   Investment in the USA is growing.    But yeah..... deflect it is what you do.  Typical liberal.

improve them. If you can.
And it's "You're ignoring him." Dimwit.
Please accept the fact that "you're" a deeply ignorant and under-educated man.

Liberal being a liberal.... name calling and insulting when they are presented with facts.

up ChicKenShit's ass again. Our leading ignoramus just loves our leading reading-challenged ageist, who loves to blame others for his failings.

...negotiating the "framework" of a "deal."  How does the Secretary General of NATO have the authority to enter into a deal regarding the sovereign territory of the country of Denmark?  How can the Secretary General of NATO make a "deal" for the U.S. to acquire the mineral rights and land of Greenland?   Short answer - he can't.  The leaders of Denmark and Greenland have stated that their sovereignty and territory are not for sale.

BigPapasan tried to claim that lack of a negotiated deal meant that no framework existed. It was pointed out to him in no uncertain terms frameworks come BEFORE negotiated deals.

"Trump Deal Framework Secures Land, Mineral Rights and Defense Concessions."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/trump-deal-framework-secures-land-mineral-rights-and-defense-concessions-libtards-joyous-480258?page=1

....and they're picturing themselves explaining to an audience or jury when we know they've just got their Beanie Babies lined up on the edge of the top bunk as though it's a Ted Talk.  

NATO cannot negotiate a deal, a framework of a deal or anything else regarding giving away Greenland's mineral rights, land or anything else to the U.S.  The only parties who could negotiate the framework of a deal are the U.S. and Denmark/Greenland.