Seriously?

...without even thinking about it.  What am I saying - you're incapable of independent thought and critical thinking.

The official board stalker and TERs biggest troll in the history of its existence proves once again that he can't see the Forrest for the trees. Missed the point COMPLETELY and attempted to be the P&R legal counsel.  
Dumbass, stupid, simpleton, jack ass, just a few names in one post alone just to stir the pot. That's his only reason for posting here. He has NO legal background whatsoever so pay no attention to this stalker.

If they’ve counted 90% of the vote and the Republican is ahead by 2% then they need time to know by how much they need to pad the vote to steal it.

Is because Newsom wants to give Democrat operatives the opportunity to see who the voters are that did not send in their mail-in ballots.   In one County, the Republican House candidate is leading by 3000+ votes, but there are 7000+ mal-in ballots that have not been returned, and there is a record of who these non-voters are.  This gives Dems a week to go knocking on doors and harvest enough ballots after the fact to allow the Democrat to overtake the Republican.  All they have to do is stamp the envelope with a fake cancelation stamp that says it was mailed on election day.   California is the most corrupt state in the union when it comes to elections, starting with "no ID required to vote" and finishing with ballot harvesting.  

Why does the U.S. continue to use the antiquated electoral college system whereby nearly every state allocates all of their electoral college vote allotment to the candidate receiving the most popular votes instead of them being proportioned according to the results? No other country uses this system for national elections. The politicians love it because they can inundate/saturate their focus/money on a handful of swing states, while essentially ignoring the rest of the country.

and with our current state of political division and dysfunction it's impossible to pass any amendment. So we'll have the EC for the foreseeable future.
Bear in mind the EC was originally conceived as one of several methods for the then-ruling power elite to keep direct power from the hands of the people, The early US was very limited in its level of true democracy.

States don't have to allocate all votes to the winning candidate, and in fact Nebraska and Maine allocate somewhat proportionally. However most states realize that allocating proportionally dilutes their influence.

The electoral college is a brilliant system. And it’s the most fair and democratic system possible. The parliamentary systems are much less democratic. In it, people vote for parties instead of candidates. You could have 8 or more political parties. If one party gets 40% of the vote and every other party gets 20% or less, then behind closed doors the politicians from the various losing parties could team up to gain power by surpassing the 50% threshold. And to make matters worse, they then can choose the President or Prime Minister with zero input from the public.  

No one (except Wanker) was comparing the Electoral College to a parliamentary democracy, so the entire first part of your post is pointless. That said, you are partly correct in the second part of your post. What you didn't say is the reason the EC was created (and also the reason every state gets two Senators regardless of population) is to protect the small states from the possible tyranny of the large states. Except what we got instead is the tyranny of the minority.

When a state in the U.S. elects it highest ranking executive official, the governor, the voters' ballots are counted on election day, and whoever has the most votes is declared the winner. Simple, straightforward, efficient, and transparent. Voters don't choose county level intermediaries to vote in their place.  And if the county is winner-take-all, voters in the minority will not have their preferences counted at all at the state level. Their votes will have effectively been tossed out. This is NOT a democratic process!  And since these intermediaries can vote as they please, despite any pledges to the contrary, they could be subject to intense political pressure. The electoral college system is more like the Iranian election system, where the seat of power, the Supreme Leader, is not elected by popular vote but the Assembly of Experts.  

has come to fruition.  Republican Incumbents Steele and Garcia were both leading after the initial vote count, and each was leading their Democratic challenger by 500-600 votes.  After the ballots came in during the 7-day grace period for mail-in ballots have been counted, both of these incumbents appear to have lost their seats.  The original count of everything received by election day showed a narrow margin of about 50.3 to 49.7 in both cases.  Surprisingly, the late ballots were not that close.  In Steele's case, ALL of the late ballots were Democrat votes, and in Garcia's case, he got about 15% of the late votes.  

...a recount of the election showed that Coleman still beat Franken by a few hundred votes....during an 8 week legal battle,  they found a box of ballots in the back seat of a car that pushed Franken ahead by a couple hundred votes.  Coleman's people sued to inspect the ballots and was told to pound sand.  Dem MN sec/state ran the whole dog & pony show.  Franken went to DC and gave the senate the majority needed to pass obamacare.  

Follow the law: File papers to initiate recounts. File papers to investigate voter fraud. Etc.. TER has no power over elections and vote counting and certifications. You have a complaint (voiced here). Now take it to the proper authorities in  CA ... and up to SCOTUS if it goes that far.
.
Or is this just a case of, "When we win, it's fair, no recounts needed. When we lose, it's unfair and stolen."

YOU would be saying the same thing I am if ALL of the "late" votes counted were for the Republicans in a 50-50 race.  I believe the candidates are doing just what you suggest, but the crazy California laws are what allows Dem operatives to get away with this.  Law enforcement is controlled by the Dem politicians here, so what do you think a call for an investigation is going to solve.  

…and from what I hear, they already had solid proof that the Dems have done this and they will be getting prosecuted for it early next year.

Have to federally require paper ballots and shorter timeframe more restricted mail-in ballots and counting deadlines.
.
Otherwise they are just going to cheat and courtroom delays make it moot if they are ever caught -- people will already be sworn into office before any correction can be determined.  
.
Florida, a high population state, can count all their ballots in a day.  Force states to copy their method for federal elections.

You seem eager to have justice. Do you also want Bondi (or whoever the next AG is) to investigate and prosecute the FAKE ELECTORS? "This could not only solve the problem but potentially make examples of what kinds of criminal charges could put away corrupt **REPS** for years in these kinds of cases."

willy (10/24/2011):
"Is it time to scrap the Electoral College?... I know the Electoral College is not the answer."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/is-it-time-to-scrap-the-electoral-college-159758?frmSearch=1#159758

a raging anarchist. Now he's just the antichrist.

That's a full blown stalker if I've ever seen one. Ridiculous!

…how his thinking has changed.

Don't you think Merrick Garland would have done it?   You should take a Hawaiian vacation like your dream-girl did.  You seem really tightly wound and more desperate than usual.  It's not healthy.  

Fake electors are a violation of STATE law and investigate by the STATE.
https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-reports/the-cases-against-fake-electors-and-where-they-stand/