whether you are rebublican or democrat, rich or poor, the problems in our country all have one common factor and until we address that factor, none of the problems from abortion to gun control to immigration will ever be resolved.
ABC-TV: FINALLY SOMEONE ASKED "HIM" THE QUESTION Charlie Kimbro
Congress and President not going to be under the new Health Care Laws.....They have their own system....of course!!
FINALLY SOMEONE ASKED HIM THE QUESTION! ON "ABC-TV" DURING THE "NETWORK SPECIAL ON HEALTH CARE".... OBAMA WAS ASKED:
"MR. PRESIDENT WILL YOU AND YOUR FAMILY GIVE UP YOUR CURRENT HEALTH CARE PROGRAM AND JOIN THE NEW 'UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM' THAT THE REST OF US WILL BE ON?"
THERE WAS A STONEY SILENCE AS OBAMA IGNORED THE QUESTION AND CHOSE NOT TO ANSWER IT! IN ADDITION, A NUMBER OF SENATORS WERE ASKED THE SAME QUESTION AND THEIR RESPONSE WAS. "WE WILL THINK ABOUT IT." AND THEY DID. IT WAS ANNOUNCED TODAY ON THE NEWS THAT THE "KENNEDY HEALTH CARE BILL" WAS WRITTEN INTO THE NEW HEALTH CARE REFORM INITIATIVE ENSURING THATCONGRESS WILL BE 100% EXEMPT ! SO, THIS GREAT NEW HEALTH CARE PLAN THAT IS GOOD FOR YOU AND I... IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR OBAMA, HIS FAMILY OR CONGRESS...?? WE (THE AMERICAN PUBLIC) NEED TO STOP THIS PROPOSED DEBACLE ASAP! THIS IS TOTALLY WRONG! PERSONALLY, I CAN ONLY ACCEPT A UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE OVERHAUL THAT EXTENDS TO EVERYONE... NOT JUST US LOWLY CITIZENS.... WHILE THE WASHINGTON "ELITE" KEEP RIGHT ON WITH THEIR GOLD-PLATED HEALTH CARE COVERAGE'S. If you don't pass this around, may you enjoy his Plan! WHAT? The Republic has a CONSTITUTION?
Amendment 28 Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators or Representatives, and Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States .. Imagine what we could do if everybody passed this around.
prediction. Turns out California has an anti-SLAP statue that allows for the award of attorney fees and a special motion to strike where:
A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person’s right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim.
What do you think? Did Scott Balber of the blue-est of blue chip law firms miss this? Or can he do an end run around the statute by couching the claim as one of breach of contract?
...You haven't got a clue what an anti-SLAP(sic) statue(sic) is.
And just why do you idolize Scott Balber? Does he give you a reach-around while he's fucking you in the ass? Does his cum taste sweet because he drinks pineapple juice before you suck him off?
"Blue-est of the blue chip law firms." ROFLMAO - so fucking what? You think he's a god? I've bitch-slapped both O'Melveny and Gibson Dunn. It's more proof that you're not a lawyer - you think Scott Balber is great just because he's in a big firm.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
