Issa has been pretty silent lately, and the Repubs. might now feel that they shouldn't be wasting more money on the a new committee investigating Benghazi than what they're spending on the VA failure; hmmm, well probably not! But, as this new report points out. They're not going to uncover any grand conspiracy regarding Obama hiding the truth about what happened!

Hillary! 2016

Jack, I know Obama didn't play any domestic dates, but do you want another apology tour?

He refuses to answer what Leon Panetta told him when he first found out about the attack. Leon Panetta will not do any interviews on the subject. Obama didn't mention he couldn't discuss b/c of national security reasons when Bill O'Reilly asked him this question in the Super Bowl day interview. Did Panetta tell him it was a terrorist attack or a spontaneous uprising? He wont say.

Between fast and furious, limiting media access, issuing orders that bypass Congress, the VA mess, the IRS abuse, releasing terrorists and chaos at the border it is difficult to keep with the debacles of the "most transparent administration ever"

Not even close! Benghazi is, at least partially are response to the Repubs. embarrassment over this!  

because I haven't followed Benghazi too closely as of late.

still dont know where sleeping beauty was....

his title of "The Teflon President," and give it to Obama. But, the Repubs, can use all that subterfuge to avoid getting anything done in congress, which kills two birds with one stone: first they don't have to stick their heads out and commit, with votes that really count, to any particular issue, and second make Obama look bad by blaming him for the problems that are not getting solves.  

-- Modified on 7/10/2014 12:51:21 PM

Looks like "moderate Matt" has left the building. You really have gone FAR FAR FAR left in the past month or so.

middle of the road matt relishing the notion that between a low information voter and a compliant press obimbo will "get away with it". now we both know matty's gonna twist it that we're putting words in his mouth or that's not what he said but, well, we know how matt is!!

There were always plenty of people who complained about the captain of the ship, ridicule him, and speculated about the possible reasoning behind his orders; why did he leave port now, why is he going in this direction, why is he calling fight-ops now, etc., etc., and rejoiced when he seemed to fail, and patted themselves on the back when they believed they were right. What they didn't seem to understand, time and time again, was the captain has his orders, and we were not coming into port until everything in those orders had been accomplished. So, the longer it took, the longer it was until we got what we wanted; to be home or in port. The more each person pulled their own weight, and did it right, the sooner the mission was accomplished. A good example was when we pulled out of dry-dock after several months of repairs, while going down the channel, the captain ran the ship aground. It's very strange feeling being on a carrier deck at about a 30 degree list to starboard! Well, those who hated the captain rejoiced. It was a while before it dawned on them, it was going to cost them two more months of being away, hundreds of miles, from home.

I thought all those congressional investigative committees, had as their objective, to find possible wrong doing by Obama and others. As far as I can tell there's been none regarding Obama. Are you telling me that the Republican's sole purpose was undermining his approval rating, while using tax payers money to do so?  

According to your propaganda you are right!

Posted By: mattradd

Issa has been pretty silent lately, and the Repubs. might now feel that they shouldn't be wasting more money on the a new committee investigating Benghazi than what they're spending on the VA failure; hmmm, well probably not! But, as this new report points out. They're not going to uncover any grand conspiracy regarding Obama hiding the truth about what happened!

-- Modified on 7/10/2014 4:03:10 PM

You are the exact type of person I'm talking about.  

Little dick,  I said they could enforce law. What about the  13th & 14th amendments?  What about the enforcement acts? Care  to respond old man?  

Executive Branch, dumbell.

I know you can't! That makes you a fraud,  no exceptions!

Your service, and others like you, allow us all to sleep in freedom.  

..........to these so called faux scandals. Hell will probably freeze over before you do.....lol.

...but then there has to be a trial in the Senate where they would need 67 votes to remove Obama from office.  The Senate would never vote to convict him of the charges;  the House knows that but those BSC Republicans don't care - they'd impeach him anyway.

You lose Mr Modified Post!

This is about congress enforcing laws. I cited several were they did. Your response,  a bureau. You stated congress could not enforce law and had your post deleted.  Typical right tactic, then declare victory.  

You are the one who is a waste of time.

It's you that deleted your post THEN challenged me to quote it. Cowardly sneaky liar.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=230608&boardID=39&page=1#230608

Our "carrier" is being run by Captain Schettino.

You're as stupid as that fucking G-9 civie supply clerk who pretends to be a spook.